Would you put these on a boy?
By 4cuteboys
@4cuteboys (4099)
United States
May 15, 2007 2:34pm CST
I have a 6 month old that is getting rug burn from crawling on the carpet. Do you think these are too girly? I mean yeah, they have boyish patterns to some of them, but they are still leg warmers which makes me think GIRL. What do you think?
http://www.babylegs.net/shop/
3 people like this
5 responses
@coachflaps (683)
• United States
16 May 07
yeah those are real girly, although cute, but definitely girly.
1 person likes this
@Candid_Ishida (659)
• United States
15 May 07
I think they are adorable! I would definitely put them on a baby boy, especially blue, green, or argyle ones. I'd imagine them with little overalls or something.
Besides, it's okay for babies to wear cuter clothes that a man wouldn't wear right? Why not dress him up all you want while you still have the chance, because once he gets older, he won't want mom picking his clothes anymore! ^^
Besides, if they help with the rugburns, they can't be bad, and some of the babies wearing them in the pictures are boys anyway.
1 person likes this
@KrisNY (7590)
• United States
16 May 07
OMG! They are so flippin cute! I'm not sure if I would put them on a boy- they are cute on the little babies! I wish I found these when my daughter was a little one- I would imagine they would be hot in the nicer weather- why ntot just put light knit pants on him- Cheaper but not near as cute. These are darling! I wish I knew a little girl- 2 of my friends just had boys! SO I guess I would aim them more for girls.
@Michele21 (3093)
• United States
15 May 07
No I wouldn't put them on my little boy =) They are really cute...on the girls. I couldn't put them on my son though, I would just put him in a pair of pants =)
@4cuteboys (4099)
• United States
15 May 07
LOL i know. I am tempted to get a pair just to see if I could live with them inside the home only. Definatly not for going out. hehehe
1 person likes this
