to be, or not to be(purposed to)

@emo_rilz (208)
United States
June 25, 2007 5:53pm CST
in a relationship, where it is getting serious, do you think it is ok for a girl to purpose to her man, or does it HAVE to be the man purposing to his woman?
1 person likes this
2 responses
@santuccie (3384)
• United States
25 Jun 07
I'd say it depends on who the bread winner is. Some women have better careers than some men, and would be though of as the provider of primary income for a household. Just my personal opinion. Lots of luvs!
@emo_rilz (208)
• United States
26 Jun 07
but what if neither could provide, and were just kind of living wiv ppl, but yea.... if they were madly in love, would it still matter who said it?
1 person likes this
@santuccie (3384)
• United States
26 Jun 07
I don't think it would matter in that case. It could go either way.
@emo_rilz (208)
• United States
28 Jun 07
cool cool, i have a question though, do you think a guy is(in general), the type of person that would be intimidated by his gf to have purposed? it is really an awkward question to ask a guy, but... would you think that is the general feeling?
1 person likes this
@FSCAries (881)
• United States
25 Jun 07
In this day and age, I think it could go either way. Yeah, typically it's the male, like what you see in all the movies or whatever, but I don't think there would be any problem with a woman asking a man for marriage.
@emo_rilz (208)
• United States
26 Jun 07
that is pretty awesome. i know what you mean, and i think that the whole movie standard should be different, not completely, but a bit more reality other than some person in a fairy tale