Who is more dangerous... Bush OR Osama Bin Laden ?
By BigMouth
@BigMouth (335)
India
17 responses
@ramitemporalis (442)
• United States
27 Oct 06
Bush is FAR more dangerous. He planned and carried out a plan to scare Americans into the approval of his war. He has the money, the resources and the power to do whatever he wants. As for weapons...America has the largest and most powerful military in the world. Military, of course, is led by Bush. Nuclear weapons...we all know America has them, and as long as Bush is in office he has the ability to use them. Osama is just an object Bush used to cause us fear- nothing more.
@RealIolo (1854)
• United States
13 Nov 06
Are you going to move to the middle east to seek training in al-qaeda? Seems you want to fight Bush because he is so horrible!
Do you see Bush encouraging people to strap on bombs to kill civilians who want to join a police force for protecting fellow civilians? Think about what you are saying!
@loray143 (485)
• Philippines
27 Oct 06
Osama can bomb a place or have people killed with the use of his Al Qaeda and other affiliate groups. Bush can bomb a place or have people killed with the use of his Army as Commander-in-Chief. Osama has claimed thousands of lives in the 9/11 plane crash on the WTC. Bush has claimed thousands of lives in the invasion of Iraq, including his own soldiers and other countless Iraqi civilians. They are just the same. Both are at par in terms of danger to the public. In short, they are both dangerous and at equal at that.
@RealIolo (1854)
• United States
6 Nov 06
They are not just the same. Bush is not trying to kill civilians. But al-qaeda is killing anyone who wants to become a policeman to protect the Iraqi people.
Civilians who are killed by US forces is an accident. They are not trying to kill civilians.
But al-qaeda is trying to kill anyone who isn't trying to kill US forces. That includes civilians.
@Victoria7 (1240)
• Spain
27 Oct 06
Bin Laden of course!!! He´s the one who organised the mass murders in the US of thousands of innocents. OK so Bush wanted to put a stop to it and avenge the terrorists (wouldn´t you) but that doesn´t make him more dangerous than that sick lunatic murdering extremist!
1 person likes this
@nannacroc (4049)
•
14 Nov 06
I'm not going to be popular here but I think Bush is more dangerous. For one thing he doesn't seem to know what he's doing. For another he behaves like a dictator in a so called democratic country. Bush is also only interested in gettiing involved in other countries affairs if there is some sort of monetary gain.
@mujeebrehman (158)
• Pakistan
17 Dec 06
Not they are equal, Bush is the most dangerous person for the world
@CYNDIITAA (43)
• United States
14 Nov 06
Boy that is A toss up!!! This, I think is close to even. If you truly know ALL the facts Bush is as ignorant and self-rightious as Bin. Personally I am hoping for and have taken action to impeach bush. Don't think it will happen. Wishful thinking.
@akuler_ler (675)
• Malaysia
17 Dec 06
of course Bush is more dangerous...Osama I think a kind people
@sweetie88 (4556)
• Pakistan
14 Nov 06
bush the hell is more dangerous. he have more money, resources etc. all.
