Bitter, Clingy Gun Owners of America and you can too

@gewcew23 (8007)
United States
June 17, 2008 3:41pm CST
I, personally, wasn’t insulted when Obama uttered those famous because I really love God and my guns. Yes I know that it was a put down, a immature one at that, but he is an elitist snob so what do you except. No big deal I am a PO’ed Christian who owns guns—nice guns and very many guns. And, yes, I’m rather clingy with them. I’m not alone either, as there are millions of other brothers and sisters, from other mothers, who really, really are endeared to our God-given right to self defense and firearm fun. Can I hear a big amen, my brothers and sisters? I think all law obeying citizens of this great country, and even around the world should own guns. Guns to hunt with, guns to look at, guns for personal defense and a few zany lead spewers should al-Qaeda, or the anti-Christ, or any foreign or domestic threat, or Godzilla ever attacks you. Come November I hope and pray that all of those Bitter, Clingy Gun Owners of America that you despise and look down upon raise up and show you the door.
6 people like this
3 responses
@fwidman (11514)
• United States
17 Jun 08
For me there is no good purpose for owning a handgun. If you must protect yourself, buy a shotgun or a really sharp knife. I wish all handguns would be outlawed. And, as for Obama, I wish he would just crawl back into whatever hole he escaped from :)
@fwidman (11514)
• United States
18 Jun 08
If you must shoot someone, you should wish to do the best job, so you'd use a shotgun. With a handgun you might shoot them once, but they may still have enough left in them to harm you back. As for the knife, it is not only a dangerous weapon it is also much quieter :)
2 people like this
19 Jun 08
I'm all in favour of cutting down on noise pollution - how about a silenced pistol? ;-)
1 person likes this
@fwidman (11514)
• United States
19 Jun 08
How about silencers for politicians instead? LMAO
1 person likes this
@ClarusVisum (2163)
• United States
18 Jun 08
Elitist snob? He was raised by a single mother in a broken home, and when there were still 5 or 6 Democratic candidates running, he was the ONLY one worth less than $2 million. Don't buy into this "elitist" nonsense--he is by far the humbler candidate. Obama goofed a bit in his words, but he clarified them later, and it makes perfect sense: What he was saying is that after so long of being given the shaft by the government, people learn that you can't depend on the government to help you out. So, to seek to reliability and order in their lives, they turn to the things they CAN rely on, like their family, friends, congregation, etc. If you want to look back at the past eight years and think "Yeah, gimme four more of that!" that's your right, but pardon me for questioning your sanity: http://clarusvisum.blogspot.com/search/label/Reasons%20not%20to%20vote%20for%20John%20McCain Haven't you been screwed over enough?
3 people like this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
18 Jun 08
Hello ClarusVisum, Just a point of clarification: You said: "Elitist snob? He was raised by a single mother in a broken home..." This statement is misleading. In fact, the majority of Obama's youth was spent in the comfort of his grandparents' home on Oahu, Hawaii, where he attended "the elite Punahou School." http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=2822061&page=3 When Obama was five or six years old, Stanley-Ann, his mother re-married "Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian oil company manager". It was between the ages of 5 or 6 and 10 years of age that Obama lived in Indonesia with Stanley-Ann and Lolo, and his baby sister. Obama only lived in a 'broken home' between the ages of two and five. And, even then, it was blanketed with the comfort of Obama's stable, maternal grandparents.
2 people like this
@santuccie (3384)
• United States
18 Jun 08
I imagine robehren is referring to gangs, and possibly 9/11. But I side with ClarusVisum all the way. McCain has no interest in our best interests. His election would be Bush's encore. As if it even needs to be said, George W. Bush exploited 9/11 to actualize his father's covetousness on foreign resources. Like ClarusVisum says, we have completely ignored the man behind the barbarism that started the "War on Terror," and instead went and killed the leader of a nation that had nothing to do with it, accusing them of denying us access to vital information and harboring weapons of mass destruction. I believe George H. W. Bush himself once said, "I wish they'd hurry up and find some of those weapons of mass destruction." Correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that Iraq and Iran sit on over 70% of the world's oil supply. Convenient that, while George W. Bush supports alternative energy development, he is entirely against alternative fuel. When asked about the price gouges on oil, he acted oblivious to it. Apparently he must also be oblivious to the fact that the earth is heating up, melting the polar ice caps and escalating natural disasters. Our home planet is being destroyed faster than ever, and American employment and stocks plummeting, while the fat cats' only concern is to get fatter. "Ah, we can let our children be the heroes and save the world (when it's too late). Let us sleep on it for now and live it up lavishly!" Yah, that's really serving your country. Salute! I would have been quicker to vote for Clinton than Obama, but I'll take him over Bush III (er, I mean McCain) without a second thought any day of the week, and even more quickly if he decides to put Clinton on the ticket with him.
1 person likes this
• United States
18 Jun 08
Uh, for one thing, I don't want to see this country piss away ANOTHER trillion dollars in ANOTHER pointless war, this time in Iran. Also, as you can see in the link I gave before, even if I agreed with John McCain on the issues, I couldn't vote for him, because his willingness to flip-flop on TORTURE of all things, something he has experienced personally, tells me that I can't trust him to stay true to any stance he takes now. Even after he became living proof that torture is used primarily to force false confessions out of people (he made false confessions under torture in Vietnam, if you weren't aware), he'll still turn around to support it just to gain favor with Bush's base? Are you freaking kidding me? That proves to me that the man is not true to himself...after all, if he'll flip-flop on torture, an extremely personal issue to him, what WON'T he flip-flop on? (The answer is "not much", evidently: http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/16/mccain-sets-a-new-record-10-flip-flops-in-two-weeks/#more-30138) http://clarusvisum.blogspot.com/search/label/Reasons%20not%20to%20vote%20for%20John%20McCain Before Obama became the nominee, I had already decided that I would vote for whoever was running against McCain. Frankly, it's just icing on the cake that Obama's a great candidate overall--he could be a lot worse and still be way preferable to McCain in my opinion.
3 people like this
21 Jun 08
Obamah clearly wants socialism, he is very open about it. He constantly says things you would have expected from Lennon and Stalin. God help this country if he gets elected, McCain is not much better, he also has very socialistic ways, Ether way we will get a comunist for prisident, very sad times for America coming.
2 people like this