What Part Of Unconstitutional Does DC Not Understand?

If I had to live in DC, I guess I would do what that famous blind man did some years ago. Remember him? He used a chain saw for self defense. Interested in the rest of the story? This blind guy was concerned about an enemy he knew he had, so rigged a master switch to all his lights in the house (he didn't use them anyway) and put up 'black out' curtains on all his windows. When he hit the switch, no one but him knew how to move around the house. The day came when the enemy came after him. Everything went according to plan with the bad guy going to the hospital and the blind man was not charged with anything. Of course, anybody else would not use the master light switch, but maybe people in DC should get chain saws for their homes.

If not for immediate self-defense, why in the heck does anyone want a handgun? I have thoughts on this, but people would think I forgot to take my medication today if I expressed them here.

This is why I do not like the government. They just cannot get it right. They need to seriously re-read the constitution.

Hello Gewcew, Well, I guess it won't be long before the persistent, fascist, selectively deaf District of Columbia leadership will find themselves back in court! The N.R.A. has pronounced a full-scale, counter-attack on all politicians and municipalities who maintain existing, or initiate new code or laws that contradict the recent SCOTUS ruling. If anyone professes a reverence for the U.S. Constitution, then they must support the effort to thwart fascist defiance of the Second Amendment, with the same vigor with which the support the First Amendment, and each subsequent outlined right. They are after all a packaged deal! Which seems a point of contention for many on the left! I guess it's time to send another contribution to the N.R.A.!

Hey, it's DC... they are STUPID and are lucky to put two thoughts together. It is time for the good citizens of DC to arm themselves, storm City Hall and explain to those fools what the 2nd Amendment really stands for, and it ain't hunting ducks.

I think that at times those in office, no matter where they are at, seem to forget that they were one of the general population at one time. I think that at times they try and please the group that will make the least amount of noise and fuss.

DC, takes our Constitution and amends it to suit "their" purpose. Most people there have body guards that "we the people" pay for and aren't concerned with how we protect ourself. "Is" they really competent? If it's not something that affects them or money they don't really care.