Triond and Hubpages, now Bukisa?
By daydreamer20
@daydreamer20 (1688)
Malaysia
December 18, 2008 8:10pm CST
I'm an active member of Triond, and quite new to Hubpages but now we have another new one which is quite similar - Bukisa. To be honest, Triond's earning is quite slow but at least, you don't need to rely on people clicking your advertisements. It is based on page impression. You will still get earnings even though people don't click on the advertisements (most people don't).
As for Hubpages, you need them to click which is pretty similar if you have a niche blog. I do have a niche blog and I find it to be more effective than HubPages. That explains why I'm not really active in there.
Bukisa, from what I can see, is something like Triond and it pays based on your page impression. The bad thing here is that you need $50 before you can request for payout. $50 based on page impression might take you very very very long time.
What do you think? Anyone who has been involved in these 3 can voice out their opinions?
1 person likes this
2 responses
@daydreamer20 (1688)
• Malaysia
9 Feb 09
Bukisa is not as good as Triond since it's calculating the profit based on unique visitors.
@SpikeTheLobster (6403)
•
19 Dec 08
Sounds exactly like AC to me. Post stuff, get read, earn. Someone else jumping on the bandwagon, but without the advantages of distribution (AC) or marketplace (Helium).
The question here is how long it will take for people to learn about Bukisa and start reading there. Triond, Helium, eHow and AC (amongst others) are well-established, whereas Bukisa is still in beta. Chances are the others will get more hits. Then again, you can always just re-publish everything from your other sites on the new one and see what they earn...
@daydreamer20 (1688)
• Malaysia
19 Dec 08
Yes, it's something like that. And you do have a point that there might not be that many visitors yet since it is still very new. If it's not giving very good money, it will not take off like the other more established ones.
