Do you support nuclear family ?

@krajibg (11923)
Guwahati, India
March 13, 2009 10:39am CST
If we analyze today’s life pattern with the economic factors we must say that nuclear families are better than joint families. This was some thing different earlier. Particularly in the country sides joint families did a good job for the land for cultivation was not divided and hence the outcome was more. But when the joint family broke to align with the current trend some problems popped up. The major problem was the security of the family. Now the nuclear families, where both husband and wife are service holders a negative impact started falling on the limited children. The limited notion brought social alienation and therefore the now generation is kind of liberated souls going berserk. Responsibility? Society and the parents both. What is your take?
6 people like this
10 responses
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
13 Mar 09
Hi Rajib! Indeed going beserk is the right definition. I feel it is the fault of parents and the media. The parents are nowadays both involved outside the home and there is so little quality time with their offsprings. The television is more and more present in the lives of children and they are aware of so much too early on in their lives. Without the parents guiding them to understand what is right and what is wrong, their heros become negative models and actions. They get the wrong idea of society. They see too much violence and very little respect and the end result is what we see now. I can't bear to think what their children's world will be like!
3 people like this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
14 Mar 09
Sadly yes that is the case Rajib
@krajibg (11923)
• Guwahati, India
14 Mar 09
You know these more than I do. I know your part of the globe is highly affected than this one where our souls rest. The micro or nuclear family has led to this social disorder and nothing else. Thanks a lot.
2 people like this
@dragon54u (31636)
• United States
13 Mar 09
I don't quite understand what you mean by joint families but in my country we have many divorced people with children that marry and they become one family. The nuclear family here is slowly dissolving. We have many, many single parents that have never been married and a lot of couples that live together for years and have children without ever marrying. We don't have many families, actually, because mom and dad both work in the majority of households and the children are raised by daycare and babysitters and see their parents an hour or so per day. Very sad.
2 people like this
@krajibg (11923)
• Guwahati, India
14 Mar 09
Well, in India till the 90s most of the families were sort of joint one. By this I mean a big family where two or more brothers of the same parents or brothers of their father's brothers would stay together, and surely the house too would be a bigger one to accommodate all. This consisted of many children growing together and the wives and others engaged in cooking and household chores.But in the mid 90s a new trend set in and these families broke in to a single family - husband, wife and children only. As they were together there was no risk as such but now being single and alienated each family is scared lest they are done harm by outsiders and hence children started getting confined within the four walls and provided with TV, video games, computer and internet and all those things that are responsible now to lead them to ashes.
3 people like this
@dragon54u (31636)
• United States
14 Mar 09
Joint families sound wonderful! You are all there to work together and support each other. In this country families are starting to live together again because of the economy and they are finding all the advantages of being a big family. It's a good consequence of a bad situation.
2 people like this
@krajibg (11923)
• Guwahati, India
14 Mar 09
Really? that is a good sign indeed. You have lot of advantages of a joint family. It also saves penny for what give people would eat would be for the sixth one too. But in a micro family lot of problems. When you broke you did not and when you are uniting again we are split. sad.
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
14 Mar 09
I am not sure on what "joint families" are. I am thinking that it is because we are from very different cultures.
1 person likes this
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
15 Mar 09
Hi. Thankyou for clearing that up. That is too bad that this is happening because to be honest, the joint family sounds like a great idea! With the economy the way it is it sounds much more practical as well. And for the children, I would imagine it would be wonderful!
@krajibg (11923)
• Guwahati, India
15 Mar 09
Yes, once we were blessed with this pattern but now it is going down to history but wish they revive at least to a certain extent. Thnks sid.
@krajibg (11923)
• Guwahati, India
14 Mar 09
I guess in all cultures family pattern has some affinity. In India until late 80s brothers and their wives all used to live under a single identity as family and as there were more than one families hence they were termed as joint family but since then a new trend set in and micro families started to ignite which has now created a hell of social disorder. Hope you got it now.
1 person likes this
@glords (2614)
• United States
14 Mar 09
I support family both the nuclear family and the joint families. I think its wonderful to have a mother and father caring for their children, however if it makes more sense for you to include extended family in your household, that is great too. I would totally love it if my parents or my husbands parents wanted to live with us. Of course we would need a bigger house. I think it would be nice for them to participate more in the lives of my children.
2 people like this
@krajibg (11923)
• Guwahati, India
14 Mar 09
Hi glords! yes if the grand parents of the children stayed with the family the children would learn some moral lessons but now the situation has reached such a turn that even your parents - in - law refuse to stay with you. so where would you go now?
@krajibg (11923)
• Guwahati, India
15 Mar 09
Yes, things should be in such shape only. No child as such would feel missing anything. But unfortunately today most children are reeling under loneliness. Thanks glords.
@sandymay48 (2030)
• Canada
14 Mar 09
Hi Rajib...I have lived all my life in a nuclear family so I have never experienced the joint family except for a short period where I lived with inlaws which didnt work the greatest. I think there are many advantages to the joint family though. CHildren would thrive much better with love from different family members from parents to grandparents. Perhaps there would be more understanding of the older generation by the younger generation if these families existed still. Working together as a family would lighten the load in many ways. Financially, everyone could pitch in that was able and make a home more affordable. Sharing of the work would allow more time for leisure. Perhaps there would be a family member available to help out with child care so the children dont need to me sent to a day care when the parents go off to work, where they will pick up every germ going and learn at an early age, how NOT to behave. One would never be lonely. We could all learn from one another. Often in this day and age of nuclear families, the parents dont have the time to teach skills necessary for independence so children leave the home, quite unprepared for whats out there. Since there is strength in numbers, Im sure a joint family would promote a strong family.
• India
14 Mar 09
Nuclear family concept is good provided both the husband and wife have good understanding between themselves and they know what they are doing in their life i.e., how they are raising their children, how they are improving their finances, etc. But in today's world, it is not possible to stick to a singular concept like nuclear family. I vote for joint nuclear families where all the related families live together but separately in their own places. This way, every family gets emotional and physical support in times of need from other family members and at the same time they can reap nuclear family benefits also.
2 people like this
@krajibg (11923)
• Guwahati, India
14 Mar 09
Hello wordseller, I appreciate your notion but that is practically impossible. One or two such families can be expected but as most of them are service holder or business holder they are forced to live in a convenient place. Thanks for responding.
@sunita64 (6469)
• India
14 Mar 09
Well a nuclear family with grandparents is something more ideal as small children learn a lot from elders. Nowadays when husband and wife are working it is only grandparents which provide and teach cultural values otherwise there are every chance of children going beserk.
1 person likes this
@krajibg (11923)
• Guwahati, India
14 Mar 09
Yes that would have been much netter but where would you get them? They too are adamant as they would not leave their ancestral home and if there are two or three brothers where would they go and settle?
@ajithlal (14716)
• India
3 Apr 09
I like the joint family rather than the nuclear family. Most times, it depends upon person to person about the nuclear family and joint family. I went to one of my friends who lives in a joint family. His house was very big and contains around 25 rooms with different family members living together. I think there was enough privacy for everyone with lots of space in the house. I also liked the idea of big dinning room where all sit together and eating together. I think most of the people now a days prefer nuclear family. The good thing about the joint families is that most of the elder family members will be take care by the younger generation. Also, I think there will be happiness and security in joint families.
@krajibg (11923)
• Guwahati, India
5 Apr 09
Hi ajithlal! That joint families had some advantages needs not be proved. But now the nuclear family is more insecure and the children are devoid of the parental care and love. Thanks for sharing your views.
@bamrahkirti (1821)
• India
14 Mar 09
You are right in your perspective but with changing times nuclear families are more popular.The reason being is less tolerance,egos and impatience among the people.people have become self centered and they just think for themselves.Now the children do not really think about their parents that how they will manage without them but as soon as they are financially independent and have families of their own,will move out leaving their parents behind. I live in a joint family with my in-laws and as me and my husband are both working so my child stays with them,so i am not bothered about his safety and security.We manage our expenses ourselves and does not take even single penny from them.So we have set a system and under this set up everybody is happy with usual ups and downs in life.
1 person likes this
@krajibg (11923)
• Guwahati, India
14 Mar 09
Very well said. Joint families are of help to the children but the ego, tolerance, comparison - when these issues come up nuclear families look better. But why can not we be a bit tolerance towards each other? At least for the sake of the children?
@reneerose (106)
• United States
14 Mar 09
Throughout all of recorded history, societies that did best not only valued life-long devotional monogomy, but viewed children as a treasure and the elderly as wise. The nuclear family were the valued norm and any other situations were seen as deficient and in need of a loving neighbor's help. Societies that thrive, not only have solid nuclear families, but actively practice charity and generosity.... helping to lift up those who require assistance and not allowing it to become the job of the government.
1 person likes this
@krajibg (11923)
• Guwahati, India
14 Mar 09
Hi! you are on the dotage. Thanks for responding.