The Messiah Part V

Tweet

I guess it is time to end this, I was planning on more of these but time to get to the point. Lets try to keep an open mind here. I do believe that Jesus was the Messiah told about that was to come in the old testament, But.. Big But. I believe him to have been only a man. A man that had the spirit of God in him, a man that died, and was resurrected by God, A man who brought a new covenant to man, A man of god that Will return to bring all nations to worship the one true God. So If the title Messiah was a title for the King of Israel, And Jesus was of the line of David and the rightful king of Israel, then he was the Messiah. But what about the AntiChrist? this can be defined in a few ways, those who say that Jesus was not the Christ or Messiah can be called Antichrist, this is not the same as being evil or the son of Satan. It can be likened to those in America that believed that George Bush stole the election and was not the true president, they would be called the anti-Bush. The second way this can be defined is one who has no legitimate claim to the kingship, a person who has supplanted the rightful king of Israel, he would then be a false Messiah or Antichrist. which will now take us to our next point. For a moment lets keep a very open mind. Lets suppose that Jesus was the Messiah, and that he was indeed human and kept to the laws and traditions of his people the Jews, as it is said he kept the law perfectly. Then he would have been married. In Fact the marriage feast where he does his first miracle was His marriage. I can go into this in a separate post if anyone wants to challenge this. So lets say he was married. If he was the legitimate Messiah, King of israel, then so would his heirs, So if Jesus had children, then his children would have right to the title of "King of Israel". If such a blood line existed, they would be very dangerous to the Church of Rome wouldn't they? The church would do anything to keep them silenced, including giving them fortunes and lordship over nations. If you would like I will supply you with the blood line of Jesus, But lets talk again about the Antichrist. If someone of this bloodline also had with in him the bloodline of a supplanter, and was apostate then would he also be considered a false messiah or Antichrist? Many have hear me say the Antichrist is alive right now, but many have no idea about what that means to me. So again If their is a bloodline of Jesus, and this bloodline rules over many nations, and one comes in that has the bloodline but also the bloodline of another group, and wishes to supplant Israel with the bloodline of his father, then He is an Antichrist false messiah who will deliver Israel up and affect them, "The work of our hands" and "our punishment" has arrived.