New method far better method than Bowl Out

@vipinl (802)
India
April 24, 2009 2:13pm CST
It was for the first time i guess they used this method of deciding the Tie by giving each one more over. And it was really interesting, and far better than what we saw in last world cup with bowl out. Deciding with bowl out was real boring end to an exciting match, this one is more like cricket.. Exctement!
1 person likes this
2 responses
@subhakars (934)
• India
25 Apr 09
Yes, you are right. T20 match is exciting but this one last over is more exciting than the whole match. we have hard hitters getting into the act thrashing the ball into the crowds. bowl out is very boring as there is no one to hit. kolkata and royals match was really awesome.
• India
25 Apr 09
Yes, Super over is exciting but Bowl out too have its charm. Super over is completely Batsman oriented wheras Bowl Out depends upon the bowler's skill. T-20, by default is a batsman oriented game and the things like Bowl out is absolutely necessary to show that even bowler's part is necessary in a game. Hence I would opt for Bowlout rather than Super Over although i am not against it.
@vipinl (802)
• India
25 Apr 09
Bowlers too have there chances, as batsman will try to hit everything, they have more chance of getting wickets.. or proving there worth by stopping them for scoring. So it gives equal importance to both, on the other hand i should say Bowl Out was more bowler oriented, and bats man had nothing to do with it. Ya cricket is batsman oriented game, and most of the spectators go there to see batting rather than bowling.. so let it be.
@kerriannc (4280)
• Jamaica
25 Apr 09
Yes it was wonderful to hear that the bowl out was excited. I am a bit disappointed that Chris side loses but hopefully ICC officials see how bowled out should be and implement it according.