It's Time to Put Nancy Pelosi Under Oath!

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
May 20, 2009 8:23am CST
Pelosi and the truth haven't met up very often in the first place, but the latest string of lies are just plain indefensible. It's time to put Pelosi under oath and bring some consequences to the little wench's accusations against the CIA. What she is doing is a felony.. it's put up or shut up time. Put Pelosi under oath and if she lies again... Let her rot in prison somewhere.. GITMO sounds good.
1 person likes this
6 responses
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
20 May 09
She should be put under oath. I'm tired of this crap. As Boehner said, it's time to put up or shut up. Either the CIA lied to congress, a crime, or Nanci Pelosi is lying now, also a crime.
1 person likes this
• United States
21 May 09
Taskr, the CIA already lied to Bob Graham, and Bob and Nancy were on the same committee at the same time, so they lied to her as well. This is a proven fact, so the CIA did lie, the only question now is if Nancy was part of any meeting that Bob Graham wasn't, and is lying about it. I would like to know, but like I said in my response to this: I don't think you (or any American) are going to be happy with the results.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 May 09
Well, putting Pelosi under oath would be part of a full investigation in the whole matter.
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
21 May 09
Taskr, the CIA already lied to Bob Graham, and Bob and Nancy were on the same committee at the same time, so they lied to her as well." As far as I know the only lie regarding Bob Graham was over what dates they met with him. That could be chalked up to poor records, but the dates aren't really the issue at hand anyway. This is about what was and wasn't said in those meetings. Pelosi herself has already lied and changed her story so there's certainly no question that she herself is NOT honest. What it comes down to is the truth needs to come out and if the CIA lied to Pelosi, they need to answer for it. If they are telling the truth and Pelosi is smearing them to save her own skin, she needs to answer for that.
• United States
21 May 09
Para, I think the CIA should be investigated as well. According to a report this weekend Sen. Bob Graham was told by the CIA that he was in four meetings where torture was discussed. But, Mr. Graham went through all of his notes and noticed that NO meetings were ever held on three of the four days, and on the fourth day they gave him, he had no record of discussing torture. When he questioned the CIA they said that he was correct, the "new" records show that he was 100% correct, and he was never briefed on torture. So if you want to put Nancy Pelosi under oath, I am all fine with that. But, I don't think that anyone is going to be happy with what comes out of the investigation. You may want to have some crowe around, Ted.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 May 09
If she is telling the truth, she wouldn't have to change her story every time she's asked a question.
• United States
22 May 09
Ted, you do have to remember that this information is still classified, so she had better watch what she says. I am not the biggest fan of Nancy, but the facts are still as I presented them. I don't use blogs as fact, nor do I know anyone else that does. I couldn't even find anything on RNC news (AKA FOX News) stating the quotes that SND provided the link for. And, you know as well as I do, if this quote were true, they would blast it over their air ways 24/7.
1 person likes this
• United States
22 May 09
SND, I noticed that no one else is using that Maddow quote. I also noticed that it was not on FOX News, who would have aired this 24/7 if it happened, or was true. I NEVER use blogs for actual facts, but apparently you believe everything that you read (well, that is if it meets your personal political needs).
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
21 May 09
I know you really hate Pelosi, Ted, and that's your prerogative but what law has she broken? As it turns out there have been quite a few discrepancies in the CIA reports and there have been several other members of Congress who have defended her. I think she WANTS an investigation and she has to now if she gets what she's asking for the truth will come out, whatever that happens to be. Annie
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 May 09
Either she is lying or ALL the other members of the committee and the CIA are lying, so let's put her (and the others) under oath and see what comes out. If she isn't lying, why is she the only one that has to change her story every time she's asked a question?
1 person likes this
@miamilady (4910)
• United States
22 May 09
Would putting her under oath make a difference? It's not a magic truth syrum. Do they do lie detector tests at this level? Those aren't even admissable in court, are they? I really haven't followed this closely at all, but I did see her on television a few days ago, and she was clearly tripping all over her words. I'd advise the woman to resign. She can't seem to handle the job.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
22 May 09
It wouldn't automatically make her tell the truth, but it would put penalties on her when her lies are exposed.
1 person likes this
@Adoniah (7513)
• United States
20 May 09
And you actually think that putting her under oath would stop her from lying? Right and what have you been smoking today? She is not ever going to tell the truth now. She will never be prosecuted. She will be allowed to get away with her lying trashy mouth. Whoever elected her, I hope they are really proud of themselves right now. Shalom~Adoniah
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 May 09
It may not stop her from lying, but it would put penalties to it.
@vellibiz (297)
• United States
20 May 09
listen to yourself, though i do believes shes wrong, do we really want to spend more tax dollars on something that doesent progress anything, if we press her is it going to solve our gitmo problems, is it going to stop terrorism? if you have a problem with pelosi dont re-elect her file for her impeachment. dont stop the whole government over he said she said.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 May 09
If she is committing a felony, why allow her to continue? Are you always this lazy?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 May 09
This is a call for her impeachment.