Where should Michael Jackson's children go?

@chaime (1153)
Philippines
July 14, 2009 4:49am CST
Sorry about this. I am a Michael Jackson fan and I do worry for his children. I'm watching Larry King live and it seems that Debbie Rowe will be fighting for custody, although I believe it's not for the children but for the money (sorry for being pessimistic). Do you think that she should get custody of the children she never seems to care about before? And is it wise to separate the children? since Blanket (Michael's youngest) is not her child, she will not get custody and if she gets custody of the older children the kids would get separated... What do you think?
1 person likes this
5 responses
@jayrene (2713)
• Philippines
14 Jul 09
i think the kids should be with their grandma like what michael jackson stated in his will. i have read about what debbie rowe said before, she said something like being a mother is not her choice, she just got pregnant for michael because michael wants to have a child and she wants him to be happy because she loves him and she doesnt want to be a mother. she also said that it was michael who took care of the kids even when they were little, changing their diapers and everything and she did nothing, she even said that michael is a great parent. so why now ask for the custody of the kids? its pretty obvious she wants the money. that would be hard on blanket if he gets separated with his brother and sister, he have lost already a father and now if debbie gets the custody he will also loose his siblings, he will feel very alone now as from what i have gathered in reading, michael are very close to his kids, and they go with him wherever he goes, so that means these three kids are close to each other too. have you seen how paris held and kissed blanket's hand at michael jackson's memorial?
2 people like this
@chaime (1153)
• Philippines
15 Jul 09
yes I agree, they should stay with the Jacksons and I have nothing against Debbie Rowe generally, I don't know her and I don't know what motivates her, oh well I do in a sense, money but I hope she realizes that she already capitalized on much of Michael as she could with her settlement in the divorce and however you would like to call the money she got when she separated from Michael, I hope that she would have enough decency and humanity to let the children go to where they will happy
@stephcjh (32327)
• United States
15 Jul 09
I think she is just doing it for the money also. I think the children should go with Michael's parents or one of MJ's siblings, like, Janet. I hope they will let the children also have a say so in this.
1 person likes this
@chaime (1153)
• Philippines
31 Jul 09
yes, I do believe too that she is just out for the money. Although recent news suggests that everything is leaning towards the kids staying with MJ's mom with the eldest female sister of Michael, Rebie (I think is her name)there helping out.
• Japan
14 Jul 09
Debbie Rowe should not be allowed to have the custody of the children. the 3 kids should stay together with their grandma and their auntie Janet Jackson. She seems to be very close to Paris. God bless the family!
1 person likes this
@chaime (1153)
• Philippines
14 Jul 09
i totally agree with you on this one :)
@busky5 (3166)
• Thailand
31 Jul 09
I think they should go to Jackson family if their mothers never treated them before MJ would die.
1 person likes this
@a_ce_e (1427)
• Philippines
2 Aug 09
The kidz should belong to someone worthy, i think they should belong to jackson family as kidz has more chance to grow happily.