So IS Sarah Palin "Qualified to be President of the United States"?

@anniepa (27955)
United States
November 19, 2009 5:04pm CST
Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour was just asked that very simple, straight-forward question by Chris Matthews FOUR TIMES on "Hardball" and he circled it, he dodged it...he did EVERYTHING he could do with it other than ANSWER IT!! Governor Barbour knows Palin personally, pretty well actually, which is something none of us here can say. Yet he couldn't seem to bring himself to say that yes, she is qualified to be President. Now I'd like to put that same question to anyone here who cares to answer it...or not...lol! I already know I'll probably be reading lots of posts about how our current President isn't or wasn't qualified but with all due respect this is not a discussion about Obama, neither attacking nor defending him. IS SARAH PALIN QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES? Annie
5 people like this
26 responses
• United States
20 Nov 09
Sarah Palin is not qualified to be president, vice president or governor for that matter. She couldn't even serve out her term and stand by her home state. She is a celebrity, not a politician or serious contender for public office. I know there are lots of people who love her, but come on, president, really?? Why do you think McCain lost so badly? It was definitely a landslide victory for Obama...if Palin was thought to be qualified the race would have been much closer or perhaps even gone in favor of the Republican ticket. Sarah Palin sees dollar signs now with her whirlwind book tour and she's havng a blast meeting the public, signing autographs, appearing on talk shows etc. She's certainly a curiousity to this nation and people want to know more about her and her family and her personal life. I could never take her seriously as the commander in chief of my nation and I don't think other world leaders would relate well to her.
3 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
21 Nov 09
She has her "base" of people who adore her and sincerely don't believe she can do anything wrong - EVER - but they're a very small group of people relatively speaking. However, they're very loyal and very vocal. They also became pretty vocal when they got mad at her for leaving them wet and cold with no autographs, though, didn't they? Her "fans" aren't like others who typically follow politics, they're more like groupies following someone like Britney or Paris around. Annie
@Maggiepie (7816)
• United States
20 Nov 09
[b]Oy, veh. You must be joking. Bestmommy, it was McCain's own fault he lost, certainly not Sarah's, who electrified their audiences! McCain was a wimpy "moderate," on the same page as his opponent on everything that matters to most Republicans, an opponent whom he never really rebutted, by the way, to our frustration! A lot of GOPers just sat out the election, feeling so disheartened & displaced by this milquetoast little weasel. No, do not blame Sarah for folks who couldn't stomach yet another "RINO" getting into the Oval Office! /^p Maggiepie WHERE ARE any OF OBAMA'S RECORDS?!?[/b]
@inedible (768)
• Singapore
19 Nov 09
I am sorely tempted to make a sexist joke here, about her being unqualified due to being female, but I shall resist the urge to do so. Not American, so I didn't pay that much attention to the debates before the elections, but I watched one where she kept talking about Alaska. Her replies to every other question turned into talk about Alaska. I think that sort of obsession with one state might interfere with her ability to effectively rule the United States of Alaska... er, America if she were to become president.
2 people like this
@inedible (768)
• Singapore
19 Nov 09
Whoops, forgot to rant about Obama. Black guy, must be a terrorist and possibly a Nazi... Born in Hawaii, which is a communist nation... Enemy of democracy... Possibly the Antichrist... Black... Did I miss anything?
1 person likes this
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
19 Nov 09
And why do you suppose she spoke about Alaska so much?
@inedible (768)
• Singapore
19 Nov 09
She likes ice.
• United States
19 Nov 09
Hi, Annie! The more I see and hear of Sarah Palin, the more I'm amazed her empty head and coquettish personality ever got her anywhere. I doubt that she could handle an important job such as POYUS, She certainly messed up in Alaska, then turned her back on those who did vote for her and quit her unfinished job! How could anyone trust her?
2 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Nov 09
I really can't see how she can ever be seen as anything other than a quitter. Annie
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
19 Nov 09
"She certainly messed up in Alaska" A budget surplus, over a thousand dollars in tax refund bonuses to her constituents, set the framework for a natural gas pipeline to the lower 48 states, etc. So what did she actually mess up before resigning?
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
24 Nov 09
Obama's a quitter too. He didn't even make it halfway through his first term as senator.
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
19 Nov 09
I don't think she is but, if the masses elect her I guess we will have to respect her as much as the right has respected Obama huh?
2 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Nov 09
You betcha... Annie
• United States
27 Nov 09
I credit Robin Williams who was on Letterman for the inspiration of this response. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/25/robin-williams-takes-on-s_n_370246.html A 7+ minute clip. Funny! One point Williams made about Katie Couric's "Ambush Journalism:" What do you read? I say, right! How sneaky was that? What kind of fools would want a CIC who cannot answer that simple question? Also, when I watched the interview I instantly realized that If Palin were bright and religious, like she portrayed herself, she would have said: The Bible. Now that would have energized her Christian Righties. But y'all Christian Righties MUST grasp this fact: The words never came to her mind because, well, she obviously did not read The Good Book much, otherwise the words WOULD HAVE COME TO HER LIPS. Certainly the Holy spirit, if Palin were in touch, would have prompted her. Behind Palin's glassy eyed smile, I bet she was praying but the answer just did not come!
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
30 Nov 09
My speakers don't work so I can't listen to Robin Williams now but I saw most of it on TV, not when it was originally aired but in replays on news shows. He really nailed it, didn't he, and so did YOU!! She admitted that she'd been "annoyed" with Katie so that's why she refused to name a single magazine or paper she read. She also was overly defensive, in my opinion, claiming she took Katie's questions to be condescending to her since she lives in Alaska, implying that they don't have magazines or newspapers up there. Nobody's ever said that! I'm from Pennsylvania and if I ran for Vice President and was being mentioned as a possible contender for the Presidential nomination but had never traveled outside the country until a short time before and if I'd already told someone that I'd formed my world view by reading newspapers and magazines if someone asked me which ones I read, would that mean they were saying people in PA don't get magazines? GIVE ME A BREAK!! She was acting like a little kid. Annie
• United States
2 Dec 09
Thank you, Annie. I had read a number of responses and comments here and thought that maybe I could "bait" some Palin believers... May they cannot think of anything? Or maybe the silence shows that I AM RIGHT?! in my assessment.
@Revan2009 (469)
21 Nov 09
Sarah Palin isn't qualified to be a President. Why? The woman is too religious, the States need a leader who won't make policy based on their faith. The President of the United States is a military and political leader, not a religious leader, therefore, in order to live in a UNITED States it's best that anti secular people are not given command of a powerful office. This brings me nicely to powers of office... Sarah Palin has clearly demonstrated she is not capable of holding such power and authority, the States need someone who won't let power cloud their judgement. Sarah Palin cannot take criticism, she usually blames everybody, anybody but herself. She abused her powers as Governor far too often as well, she also lacks intellect a President must have eg "Africa is a country" when I was taught it was a continent at the age of 7. It's nice to see America wants to provide equal opportunity to black, women, tall, short, fat, skinny, young and old... However, what matters more than colour or gender is intelligence, good policy, wisdom, experience, morals, and love for the country - on that basis, Palin fails epically and shouldn't be President.
2 people like this
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
20 Nov 09
Yes, she is a lot more qualified to be president than that loser community organizer. At least Palin has some actual executive experience whereas the moron in office does not... in fact that loser never had a leadership role in anything in his life previously to defrauding the gullible Americans who voted for this Moron In Chief. America will be damn lucky to survive this communist idiot, and he does not have our best interests at heart like Bush did.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Nov 09
I guess you didn't bother to read the OP where I said this isn't about Obama, in fact this discussion has nothing to do with Obama. As for the ACTUAL topic of this thread, I guess you're saying that having been governor of a state with less than half a million people for half a term makes her qualified to be the leader of the free world. Thanks for your opinion! Annie
@iriscot (1289)
• United States
20 Nov 09
Absolutley NOT!!!
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Nov 09
Short but sweet and to the point! Annie
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
23 Nov 09
Why not?
@Aingealicia (1905)
• United States
20 Nov 09
Absolutely not. Look at the scandles, true or not, surrounding her. Look at what she has done to Alaska. Ainge
1 person likes this
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
20 Nov 09
"Look at what she has done to Alaska" Ok, thats the second time I have seen that in this thread. Could ya be more specific? I agree the faux scandles, though indeed faux, would be an albatross for her.
1 person likes this
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
20 Nov 09
I'm still trying to figure out what every ne means when they say "what she did to her state" like a negative thing. I was refering to the nonsense from the last election, as bogus as it was, is still going to come back with a vengence if she tries another run.
1 person likes this
• United States
20 Nov 09
x- I have a question for you....sence when is balancing your state budget and actually having a surplus (one of the few states I might add), doing state refunds to every resident of the state due to the surplus and taking down a crook poltican make you doing a bad job? I mean really what is it people want from their elected officials? I would love to have someone come do for my state what Palin did for Alaska.
@jerzgirl (9226)
• United States
19 Nov 09
No. She wasn't even qualified to finish her elected term as governor or she would have. They don't answer what they can't answer. They know the answer - they only support her because they know she's electable, regardless of qualifications and they want to regain the Presidency. Even if the person elected is unqualified.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Nov 09
Do you really think she's electable? I know the polls I've seen show that only a VERY small percentage of the people would "ever consider" voting for her. Annie
@jerzgirl (9226)
• United States
20 Nov 09
Unfortunately, I do think she has the potential to be elected. She's definitely got more pull than the other previous GOP candidates with the people. Whether or not that pull could be maintained with a radical like Beck is realistically an entirely different question. Like it or not (and I don't), she has a strong following. That can convert to votes if played right. It's a frightening prospect, but one that we shouldn't yet take too lightly.
1 person likes this
• United States
29 Nov 09
She meets the legal definition of qualification, but I don't think she's ready yet to assume the position.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
30 Nov 09
That's just it, just because someone is "eligible" to run for and hold the office of POTUS doesn't mean they're "qualified". I'm not sure what the percentage would be but a fairly large number of Americans are technically "eligible" but the vast majority of us will never be qualified. I think I'd include Sarah Palin in the latter! Annie
• United States
20 Nov 09
I think Mrs. Palin would be an excellent president. She does something no one else does - answers questions straight forward. She comes back to Alaska in some discussions because that is where her experience has been as a mayor and a governor. In her time as governor, she brought money to each individual person of her state by insisting they be paid by the oil companies for the use of the natural resources of that state. Not one other politician can say that. She knows what terrorism is and doesn't dance around it like kids playing a game. She know her son, who has served in Afghanistan, and his fellow soldiers need the troops that are being withheld by an indecisive Congress and White House. I would feel safer with her in the White House than I do now. She is not a Harvard grad, which seems to be the main offense in the media. Although she was insulted, had her family beaten down, and had the most destructive media blitz ever seen turned on her, she held up with grace and dignity. That is more than I can say for those speaking against her. She does not stoop to name-calling and even had the courage to go on that miserable SNL and face those who tried to turn her into a cartoon character. Again, she showed more dignity and class than anyone else in either campaign. I was totally ashamed that even the people who pulled her into the run for the vice presidency turned against her. Why did they do it? Because she has a penchant for being honest and forthright. That simply is not allowed in politics. Had they left her alone and let her be herself, McCain would have won. No one came to see him, but everyone wanted to see her. I voted for her not him, hoping he would have to step down and she could move up. She is everything I love about being a woman. She's strong, loving, thinks every child should have a chance to be born and stands with her family in crisis situations. She is unapologetic for bringing her beautiful son into the world although the Left seemed to think it was a horrible thing to do. My daughter is Down's syndrome. SHE is the one standing beside me every day and helping in every possible way to care for her dad, who has never recovered from a stroke. Everyone else is too busy. She not only has time, she insists on learning how to do everything from giving medications, to baths, to cooking meals! She is not a throw-away child! She has more common sense than most 'normal' people. Could Sarah Palin be president? You bet your sweet life she could and a darned sight better than the last few!
@Maggiepie (7816)
• United States
20 Nov 09
[b]Once again, "Othermaggie," ()we're on exactly the same page! Maggiepie WHERE ARE any OF OBAMA'S RECORDS?!?[/b]
• United States
20 Nov 09
It's too late to do anything about our current president. He has been put into office. But we can work to make sure he doesn't have two terms. I frankly think we should vote all current members of Congress and the White House and do so after no more than two terms from here on out. These jobs were not supposed to be life time positions for the very reason we see today. They forget about their country and the people they are supposed to serve. Instead Power becomes the main priority. If they can not look forward to more than two terms maybe something substantial will be accomplished. I also think they should be given maybe ten percent of their annual pay as a retirement package. The rest of the people have to work long term to get a retirement. If a Congressman or woman serves as little as half a term, they get the full annual salary for the rest of their lives! They need to put into social security and be given the choices for health insurance that the rest of us have. They are currently exempt from all the goodies they bestow on us. Then they have the gall to talk about other Golden Parachutes. Who is willing to collapse theirs?
@jb78000 (15139)
20 Nov 09
what are the criteria? judging by the one you have now and the numpty before him i'd say one is 'being bloody annoying'. am i right? if so then if anything she is overqualified. if another one is 'having a very limited knowledge of the villages outside your hamlet' then i'm going to the bookies right now to put a bet on her... request - please start some discussions that do not involve palin annie. pleeeeeeeease
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Nov 09
OH NO, my cute little rabbit has turned on me too!! Annie
1 person likes this
@jb78000 (15139)
20 Nov 09
i am not actually a rabbit annie - anyway i was just making a suggestion about possible variety in future discussions.
1 person likes this
@artistry (4152)
• United States
21 Nov 09
...Hi annie, I started this yesterday, but could not get it to post.So here gkoes again. Technically Sarah Palin is "qualified", she is 35 years of age, a U.S. citizen, born in the United States. There it ends, there is no requirement to understand the constitution, nothing that says you must know what cases the Supreme Court has recently passed, nor what the names of other heads of state are? No requirement that you understand how one countries economic situation may effect another country. Or that the person doesn't just out and out lie on camera. Sarah Palin was unleashed on the U. S. by John McCain, and she will make him wish that he had never heard of a Sarah Palin. She is more dangerous than the one who just left office and she is going to be around for a long time in some capacity. I think the Republican party will try to stop her if she tries to run in 2012, because it will be a disaster, just as John McCain's strategist said it would. If she keeps leaving people in the rain without signing the books they bought, they may not have to worry about her. She usually quits before the completion of whatever she starts. Take it easy.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
21 Nov 09
I have a feeling McCain already wishes he'd never heard of her but he's got too much class to say so outright! Annie
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
19 Nov 09
I am noticing a pattern today annie, it seems your falling off the wagon again. did you call your P.A. buddy? Noooooooo, you didn't, did you. Anyway, I hate to be an enabler, but I'll at least answer your question. She is as qualified as any of the other fools who have actually won the job in recent years.
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
20 Nov 09
"Day after day there's discussion after discussion about President Obama but no one is supposed to start one about citizen Palin" *corrected
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 Nov 09
Nope...nope...nope. This citizen is on a book tour and her mug is all over the place. The book she's schlepping all over the country promoting is about the election so discussions about her as it relates to the subject of the book IS fair game. Check mate.
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 Nov 09
Now now, xfahctor. Day after day there's discussion after discussion about Obama but no one is supposed to start one about Queen Palin even though she's on her book blitz right now? Gimme a break.
1 person likes this
@stealthy (8181)
• United States
20 Nov 09
I would have to say she is at least as qualified, if not more qualified, than Obama. And, she is considerably more qualified than Hillary Clinton who is a disaster as Secretary of State.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Nov 09
I said this wasn't about Obama but I can't help myself...at least both Obama and Clinton know the difference between "Iran" and "Iraq"! Annie
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
24 Nov 09
Annie, you really shouldn't get into an argument over who knows geography when Obama doesn't even know how many states are in the country that elected him.
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
20 Nov 09
I'm actually kinda suprised. I expected Clinton to be doing a much better job as secretary of state than she is....I actually had hope for her in that position.
@cream97 (29087)
• United States
20 Nov 09
Hi, anniepa.. No she would not. Hillary Clinton would make a better female president than Sarah. Sarah seems like she carries around too much of personal baggage for me. She is not mature enough to handle the throne it takes to be president. She needs to resolve her issues with her son's baby mama before she takes the high seat..
1 person likes this
• United States
19 Nov 09
She is just as qualified as Obama. And he is our president now. The reason he circled the answer is because he does not want to "announce" anything too early. If there is going to be one. Plus in not answering the question it brings more hype and has more people talking about her.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Nov 09
Good one, Spall! Lil, I wish I could hypnotize everyone so they forget Obama even exists because this discussion really has nothing to do with him! We've had that debate. I'm not clear on what you mean when you say he doesn't want to announce anything too early; are you referring to Barbour's own rumored Presidential aspirations? Do you think he wants more people talking about her in a good or bad way? Annie
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 Nov 09
So, he's pimping in a media wh0re kinda way?
1 person likes this
• United States
20 Nov 09
All I meant is she is qualified according to the laws of this country. Also just because everyone wants to ask the question now does not mean that Palin wants to answer it now. It is way too soon to throw you hat in the ring. I also think by leaving it unanswered it gives Palin a change to see how big her support is. A lot of people are "keeping the guessing". No one on the republican side has thrown there hat in. Some have been asked....NONE of the are answering it....yet. I just hope the whole things does not start as early as last year. IT started wayyyyy toooo early and lasted wayyyyy tooo long.
1 person likes this
@aerous (13434)
• Philippines
20 Nov 09
I don't think Sarah Palin,is qualified being the President of the United State of America. Secretary Hillary Clinton is better than Palin...She's not able to run the country in my opinion...
@andy77e (5156)
• United States
20 Nov 09
No, this isn't about Obama. But it is about the qualifications to be president. In order to answer that, we can look at past, or current presidents and their qualifications. So given that, and given the current president, the answer has to be, that pretty much anyone can be president now. If Palin is not qualified, than neither is the current president. If the current president *is* qualified, then there is no possible way Palin could *not* be qualified.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Nov 09
Pretend you've never EVER heard of Obama. Pretend you just got back from being abducted by aliens or something...lol! We could go back and forth and on and on forever about Obama and Palin...HE screwed this up, well, SHE doesn't know that, etc., etc. etc... Just go by your own standards of who is qualified to be the "leader of the free world". I don't necessarily mean someone you'd vote for based on your views on the issues but what qualities should a person have in order to be President. Annie
1 person likes this
@andy77e (5156)
• United States
21 Nov 09
Right. If Obama never existed, then likely we all would have higher standards, and Palin would not be a better alternative. But since we don't live in a fictional world of make believe, than we have to face reality which is that Palin is clearly a very good alternative. I mean, if we are going to eliminate every bad president in US history, then we have to eliminate Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush Sr, that awful Carter (worlds worst president), and likely Nixon, LBJ, FDR, and dozens of others. Then we can live in our imagined happy place where only totally great people are elected. In that place, yes, Palin is not qualified to be president. But, that's not where we live. All those people were presidents, and thus Palin is equally qualified to be president.