How To Stp the Illigal Non-Military Trials of Terrorists--& Why It Must Be Done

Were you and Phyllis Schlaffley so upset when the other 100+ people accused in terrorism-related cases have been tried in federal courts? I'd say it's a matter opinion whether "she's right every time she talks," with all due respect. By the way, I happen to KNOW I'm not "UNAMERICAN" no matter what anyone says! I'm as All-American as one can get! Annie

As I say to everyone Mags so no special treatment for you, you link doesn't work, please provide a synopis.

Very good article. I especially liked "The U.S. Constitution can rescue us from the Obama Administration's latest push toward "remaking America." Our Constitution is on the people's side to stop Obama from turning the judiciary into a platform for America's sworn enemies to spread their propaganda and even use our own laws against us. Our Constitution's framers foresaw the probability that power-hungry men would try to take over the judiciary. So, they gave us the tools to maintain a government based on the separation of powers." and ""Federal District Courts shall have no jurisdiction over any case involving unlawful enemy combatants, as that term is defined in the United States Code (title 10, section 948a)." - And how many know about this? "Before Eric Holder became Attorney General, he and other Justice Department lawyers were in law firms that represented detainees at Guantanamo. Those lawyers should all be disqualified; they shouldn't have ever been hired by the Justice Department." Or do they even care? Or care or consider this: "There are many bad consequences to staging the trial of KSM in New York City. If he is given all civilian constitutional rights, the government will be required to turn over to him vast amounts of U.S. intelligence and information that will imperil national security and put us in danger of future acts of terrorism."

Just one more sensible and correct thing that Congress will not do. The frustrating and saddening thing is that we the people have no one standing up for us in Washington. The ones who would do the right thing are so much in the minority and the ones on the fence are too spineless to go against the party line, even when they know it is of great importance and a matter of national security to do so. When our congressmen will sell our country's future to buy their jobs or to curry favor, we must realize that the nation is doomed. They must all go, every one of them. It's time to elect representatives of the people. Phyllis Schlafly is a successful woman with a successful career. She should be lauded by feminists but she doesn't support all of the positions held by NOW and the liberals. This means she cannot be admired for any of her accomplishments. They do not even believe in their own supposed vision, that a woman should be free to be whoever and whatever she wants to be. She must be what they want her to be. That is just oppression of a different sort.

Hi Maggiepie, how could you come up with such interesting discussion towards the end of the month? I have other commitments that have to be cleared on or before December 1st. So I will be gone for just a couple of days. Do wait up for me. I promise a nice and lengthy reply on this one.