War in Iraq

I don't think we should have gone in to begin with and I never voted for Bush. However, considering our rather extensive investments into this endeavor we also should not abandon the Iraqi now. We need to pull out in a careful enough manner to make it possible for them to care for themselves without being overcome by the bad guys. (you can fill that in yourself)

The problem with asking a question about whether or not we should have gone to war in Iraq now is we're basing our opinion with the benefit of hindsight. Bush made the decision because our intelligence and intelligence from several countries said Iraq had weapons of Mass destruction and intended on using them. After our government ignored information that could have prevented 9/11 from happening, I think Bush made the right decision, based on the information he had, especially since Sadaam did more to indicate he had them than provide evidence he didn't. Even with the benefit of hindsight, I still think the decision was the right one. Sadaam may not have had the weapons, but there is plenty of evidence that he wanted them and was trying to obtain them. The world and Iraq are better off without him.

I totally agree with you and as usual us british had to follow again

No, it is dumb and time consuming.

I don't care what is happening in Iraq.

i really don't think the usa should have sent it'soldiers in irak so that they can die in a foreign country.to me(i'm not a american)this war is just a show off.the usa is claiming it;s throne as the most powerfulest country in the world and i think ot is not fair that people lose their lives so that a country gets the recognition it deserves.