Useless Divas?

Australia
February 22, 2010 3:29pm CST
In your opinion who do you think is/are the most useless diva(s): Lets face there are only maybe 5 divas that can actually wrestle. Who do you think WWE should just scrap altogether. First I have to say the Bella Twins because to me they are just a gimmick and eye candy. Second Maria because she has been there for quite a lengthy time now and still has hardly approved.
2 responses
@megamatt (14331)
• United States
22 Feb 10
First all, not one woman in particularly, but the fact that WWE has two championship belts for the women is an utterly stupid idea. Especially considering that Diva's Championship is one of the most horrid looking belts in wrestling history. If that belt is never seen again, I will not shed any tears. Just keep postponing the Diva's title finals until the end of time. Bury the belt where no one could ever find it. I mean really bury it deep in the ground. I would say melt it down but looking at that belt, it is obvious that if that thing is melted, it could release something into the air that could destroy all sentient life on earth. In case anyone doesn't get the picture, I really hate the Diva's Title and it should be done away with. They did a good thing unifying the tag team belts, now just have the Women's Belt float on both brands as well. As for divas I would get rid of, yeah the Bella Twins really serve no purpose other than the fact they are twins. Really, that's it. In fact, it would just be better to make a list of the women that I would hang onto. Gail Kim, Melina, Mickie James, Beth Phoenix, Jillian, Katie Lea, and Natalya. Keep Maryse but make her into a valet. Oh and please give Jillian a new gimmick. Making fun of Brooke Hogan was funny at first but is just run its course. These women should make a solid enough division. The interesting thing is, WWE has so many good women but their division actually looks weak because they pad it with so much useless eye candy. If the eye candy can wrestle, that's one thing but so many of them just are there to smile and look pretty. And they have other purposes too for the locker room that I don't think should be discussed, but I think you can use your imagination and fill in the blanks.
1 person likes this
• Australia
22 Feb 10
I agree with you on the diva title. It kind kills the whole division and yes it is pretty ugly but the womens belt isnt much better loooking either lol. I also agree with all the women you mentioned to keep in the WWE. What I hink we really need to see though natalya and katie lea getting a push. And yes Jillian definetly needs a new gimmick. I really wish she could of held the diva belt longer than those 5 seconds that one night on Raw. I actually see potential in here. Maryse would make a good valet too and definetly more suitable role for her. I think they should really bring back the women tag team belts actually. It would be better than having two separate single belts and they havent had them around since the 80s I believe. Why did they ever get rid of them in the firt place anyways. Anyways thanks for your opinion and really good solid answer. Happy mylotting!
• Canada
22 Feb 10
Also as a woman don't even get me started on how stupid the whole "piggy James" thing was that they had going on with Michelle McKool! That was absolutely horrid and I seriously think they took it WAAAAYYYY too far by shoving a cake shaped and decorated like a pig in her face! Then dumping a bowl of punch over her head. Mickey James may have a little bit of a butt or "junk in her trunk" but to say she's a fat pig is sickening. Plus what message do you think that sent to all of the girls of all ages watching? Like girls and women don't have enough pressures by society to look a certain way! I was soooooooooo disgusted!
• Australia
22 Feb 10
Purple Teddy Bear: Yes the Piggy James thing was horrid. I had anorexia in my mid teens and watching that just really took me back to a bad place even considering how immature the storyline was to begin with. So many young women including myslef look up to mickie james as one of the most dominant women in the industry and just because she not a size 2 they have to pick on her. Thats just wrong. If you look back at the women wrestling in the 70s or even 80s half them would never meet the standards that the buisness has today for female wrestlers. Alot of them back then werent super teeny tiny, they didnt get boob jobs, they didnt wear almost nothing...they were the real women in the industry..they women that defined themselves in this sport. Now its just about looks and size. MegaMatt: Agree again with you with what you said there. And you siad your fav wrestler is awesome kong. Thats great I think. Most favs females in the buisness arent the little teeny weeny girls either. I like ODB and Natalya as well as Beth Phoenix.
1 person likes this
• United States
23 Feb 10
Honestly, they are all just there to be seen. However, I actually respect Divas like Mickie James and at one point, I liked Chyna and Sable(total throwbacks) I miss Jazz (at least I think that was her name) and wondered when they would find any actual women that actually go hard. Its like now the 'Mean Girls' storyline is totally boring and it pisses me off the way that stick figure treats Mickie but I already know that is leading up to something 'serious'. Back to my point, the twins, Beth, Maria, and the rest of those implanted chicks are just there because guys don't want to just watch a bunch of dudes beating each other up..lol..men always enjoy a good catfight even if it is weak and boring...
• Australia
23 Feb 10
Thats very true. It seems more likely that guys would prefer to much thin big busted girls have a un techinal catfight than some thicker girls have an actaul wrestling match. But I dont think that is the right way of thinking. In the end its too much eye candy and a waste of time. They might as well just scrap it right.