looks like the next 2 years.

@dark_joev (3034)
United States
November 2, 2010 10:13pm CST
Will be nothing changing government getting bigger and the federal going farther in debt so it should be fun to see no changes to our government for the next two years we just half hired back the GOP who got us here to begin with. As it seems at least when I started this the senate looks like the Dems are going to keep it and the House will go over to the Republicans. So the two headed monster will be in full force in Washington. Get ready for no changes and well as I said government getting bigger and well spending going up.
2 people like this
7 responses
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Nov 10
The democrats have increased the deficit more than all the administrations and congresses in the first 200 years of the US and you're saying it's the Republicans' fault? HAAHHHAAAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHHAHHAHHAHAHAA :: breath :: HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA Face it neither party has given a crap about spending. Both have had ample opportunity to do the right thing. The only change happening tonight is that waste of human flesh Pelosi doesn't get to collect bribes and play on her airplanes anymore. Obama has lied through his teleprompter about Republicans preventing him from getting anything done. He got his unread, uncontitutional health care bill passed. He got his overbloated, waste of money, no job creating spending bill passed. He got most of what he wanted but the little infant can't be happy if he has to hear NO. So now he gets to sit on his lazy butt, in his dirty diaper, whining that it Congress's fault it stinks. For him, there is no change. Everything that he doesnt' like will always be someone else's fault.
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
3 Nov 10
Yeah the Democrats could of made some really good social progressive changes but didn't because they want to keep those as issues. And well the Republicans are for making government bigger so they are a part of the Problem. They always have increased government and well they also are for dragging the nation in to wars with out a formal declaration of war from congress violating the direction we needed to stay on for us not to get into this kind of trouble. We need to protect the rights of the individual and allow the individual to define their own family and their own marriage. Also we need to get the federal government to only do some jobs and not all of the jobs that it has. Defense is something the Federal Government could and should handle. Here is the three focuses that we need federal Government to be on Defense, Education and Law & Order.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Nov 10
What we need is are elected and appointed officials who accept the US Constitution as the basis for all laws and regulations at the Federal level. Which would encompass most of what you said. This would include completely butting out of things they don't have the authority to mess with. They have no problem with the parts of the Constitution that grant them the authority to act, but few give a flying fig about the parts that tell them what is none of their business.
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
3 Nov 10
Yeah, They seem to all know the parts that give them power but seem to forget those other minor details. Well get ready for another round of the government growing and taking away our personal freedom. Hopefully some of the new people into the political arena will be the people we need but I think they will quickly become a part of the two parties massive agenda. I mean I hope the guy from Ohio does what he says he will do and listen to the people that really for a majority really want. Small Government with a balanced Budget and oh it to not get involved in their personal life. Ron Paul for President in 2012 that is all I can hope for as maybe we can avoid a train wreck that these parties currently have us on.
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
3 Nov 10
The importance of the Republicans, who were sent to Washington to cut spending and cut the size of government, takiong control of the House is that all money bill must start in the House. It seems like Wisconsin Rep Paul Ryan will Chair the House Budget Committee. He is one of the new Consertives Leaders who is committed to cutting spending and reducing the size of the government.
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
3 Nov 10
hopefully Ron Paul won't have to vote no on another budget. That might cause some people to have a heart attack in the House. As well they have heard him vote No a lot. To here him say yes to a budget might actually make the news.
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
3 Nov 10
Platitudes are over with only thing that matters now is policies. The Republican for the most part played a good game. They didn't get mixed up in the muck of policies they just stayed on course with the platitudes of lower taxes, less spending, and less debt. Problem is no one actually gave a plan on how to do that. I have run experiment here on mylot asking people, okay you want spending cut what do you want to cut. Those that will actually answer the question give me some cuts that total a couple of hundred million dollars. I wouldn't put it past the new Congress to do something like that cut a couple of hundred million dollars out of a 3.7 trillion dollar budget and claim we cut spending. Then when you get into the whole paying down the debt yet they want to cut taxes at the same time, question how?
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
5 Nov 10
Amazing isn't it? I'd say we should take to the streets but with the infrastructure problems in my state right now, I'm not sure that too many people should be on these streets and I haven't a clue how our incoming governor is going to get the billion dollars it has been estimated is necessary to make it safe here in Pennsylvnia. Our new guy claims he can do it while cutting taxes but he hasn't given any hints as to how. He's not going to get it from his buddies in congress and the feds have already vetoed a highway toll increase. Guess we just sit back and wait for the wave of the magic wand.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
3 Nov 10
Dude, government was going to get bigger and our debt was going to grow regardless of which big party won. The only way to reduce government and reduce our debt is to elect serious libertarians and constitutionalists that care about the country more than their own personal power. Sadly most people are still buying the crap the media feeds them about non R&D politicians being "too extreme" or "incapable of winning". As long as the majority keeps buying that load of crap it will continue to be true.
@k15682 (300)
• United States
3 Nov 10
I couldn't agree more! It will be the he did/she did finger pointing now.
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
3 Nov 10
yeah the only hope is that maybe we can get some social progressive with a good mix of Economic Conservatism. Or maybe they will attack each other to where very little harm is caused. We really need Libertarians like Ron Paul in our government as he is a good representation of what people really want.
@morgandrake (2136)
• United States
3 Nov 10
Oh goody. Another two years of gridlock, and one party blaming the other for it. I do like your "half-hired" description. Too bad, the GOP is going to argue that it is a ringing endorsement of their plan to bankrupt us all.