Should the Republicans Compromise?

@mattic (282)
United States
November 3, 2010 12:47pm CST
Given that it was compromise that ruined the Republican takeover in 1994, should this group of Republican's "reach across the aisle?" I don't think so, and here's why. The election was a referendum against statism and big government, any compromise will be a move from the positions the candidates were elected on. The American people won't be screwed with again. They should push for even more free market liberty and less government control. It will expose the statist, socialist desires of the Man-Child even more.
2 people like this
14 responses
@djbtol (5493)
• United States
4 Nov 10
No, Republicans should not be too quick to compromise. If Republicans know the right way to proceed, any compromise with the democrats will be a mistake. I fully expect that the next two years will be a constant battle between the two parties. Undoing the damage obama has done is the first order of business, but stopping him from doing anything else is a close second. Since obama's leftist agenda is wrong for our country, a stalemate is not all bad.
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
4 Nov 10
I don't think the Republicans should compromise. The American people should be given a clear choice in the 2012 election. How do you compromise on such issues 1. Big Government vs Small Government 2. Federal Control vs State Control 3. Government run vs Free Market 4. Balance the budget by raising taxes vs Cutting spending Maybe it is time the President compromises.
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
3 Nov 10
Reaching across the aisle under the Democrat-controlled Congress meant "here's what we're going to do - you have no ideas of your own so you have to agree to our plan". Any attempt to explain the ideas of the other side was met with "you have no ideas of your own". Then they told the public "they have no ideas of their own, but they are just being the party of no". I wouldn't blame this new majority in the House if they didn't feel like reaching across the aisle to their Democrat colleagues. Not attempting to compromise, however, may leave the voters feeling they are just as arrogant as the congressmen they were elected to replace. Those who were elected have an obligation to do what they were elected to do. If they don't, they will be ousted in the very next election. They were sent to Washington to put the brakes on, to halt runaway spending, to extend the Bush tax cuts and to repeal or defund health care. They must do those things even if it means that reaching across the aisle will result in no cooperation from the Democrats. Compromise is good, but compromise that gets in the way of implementing the changes they were elected to accomplish will only infuriate the American public. It's going to be a bit of a dance at first. They must be open about what they are doing and why, and do only what is supported by the people they represent.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
3 Nov 10
I'm curios, rollo, since I wasn't able to follow too many races closely. What state had landslide victories for the Republicans? I saw quite a few close races that indicated that a little over half of the population supported the Republican candidate. That means that a little less than half did not support them. So, the assumption that these people must now do A, B & C or they will automatically be voted out in the next election is a little bit presumptuous. I believe that the American public in general want to see something accomplished. If these spanking brand new candidates can't manage to accomplish anything during the next two years what you will see is a swing in the other direction.
@mattic (282)
• United States
3 Nov 10
A look at the national and state maps, and the sea of "red" on each map, indicate the mandate the American voters have given against the O-genda. The changeover of 1994 was unexpected, but this time the Dems saw it coming and could not stop it. The victory is huge. In races all across the country, the DemocRat candidates were running AGAINST their own policies and trying to distance themselves from Perma-grin Pelosi. The greatest service the incoming Congress can do the American people is to grind government to a halt. The less Congress, and especially the Marxist in the White House, get done - the better it is for the American people. An immediate repeal of O-Care, though the Whiner in Chief will veto it, will force the current administration to show its true colors. Cutting spending, in all areas including defense, is expected. If you believe the American people will not be vigilant, you are sadly mistaken. If the Republicans think that, they will be soon unemployed.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
4 Nov 10
I didn't ask what colors the maps were, mattic, I asked how close the races were, so if you're unable to anwere the question, you really should stay out of the thread. The American people want to see results and saying that the less Congress can get done, the better, is ridiculous. We elect people into those positions so that they can get things done. You're like an internet billboard of some kind...
• United States
4 Nov 10
Here is the problem with your logic: If they don't compromise than nothing will get done, and if nothing gets done then they won't do what they said they would during the campaign, and they will be kicked out of office. Sound good to you? Republicans don't have a veto proof majority, so if they don't compromise then they won't have "even more free market liberty and less government control." When you are elected by an angry mob, they aren't patient with you at all.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
4 Nov 10
Apparently many are logic deficient around here. All they care about is the win. Now that they have their big win actually doing the job they were elected to do is somehow not in the game plan.
• United States
4 Nov 10
mattic, I am sure you remember when republicans did what you want them to do in the 1990's and that lead to an easy reelection for Clinton, and low approval numbers for republicans. If this angry mob was so smart then why did they elect people that couldn't do what they said they would? We all know that government doesn't create jobs, yet these idiots told the world they WOULD create jobs just by electing them. Now they actually have to do it with with a slim majority in the house, a minority in the Senate, and a democrat in the oval office. Either they lied to you, or they are completely ignorant. Either way, your "educated angry mob that understood the failings of Keynesian theories" should have been smart enough to see this and not vote for them. The other thing that you forgot is that the angry mob actually put some of the people that caused this mess back into leadership positions. Don't you find it funny that NO Tea Party members are going have ANY leadership positions? So they fought a bunch of spenders, just so they could put another bunch of spenders in office. While they don't even get a thank you from the RNC. I hate to tell you this, but you and the Tea party were used by the RNC. So, how educated was this angry mob?
@mattic (282)
• United States
4 Nov 10
All appropriations bills originate in the House. Therefore the House holds the "purse strings". All that is necessary is to withhold funding. On the Senate side...filibuster like there's no tomorrow. I can't wait to see the Petulent One's temper tantrums over the next two years. It may have been an "angry mob" but it was an educated angry mob that understood the failings of Keynesian theories much better than the media crowned "Smartest President ever"...or the media for that matter. The angry mob reads and understands Bastiat, Hayek, Von Mises, and the Federalist papers. That is why we are so angry. We have seen the shining results of individual liberty and free market ideals trashed by big government statists since Woodrow Wilson, and we are fed up with it. It is time for the adults to run the country.
1 person likes this
@TTCCWW (579)
• United States
3 Nov 10
They should take this oppertunity to become conservative and put a real platform of small business, smaller government and true consrvative ideas back in place. We lost the consrvative party in 1980 and it is way past time for them to come home to real American values.
1 person likes this
@hofferp (4734)
• United States
3 Nov 10
I know we had some pretty convincing wins in NM; didn't look purple to me. And I expect our new Congressman (Republican) to do what he said he'd do. I also expect our new Governor (Republican) to do what she said she do. ETC. I'm just unhappy our Senators weren't up for re-election... And since they were lucky not to have to run for re-election, I'm sure hoping they were "listening"/"watching"!
1 person likes this
• United States
3 Nov 10
There is little to compromise the republicans has checkmated and won water loo Jim Demint said we will find out who won this battle in November on face the nation 3/28/2010 Obama burnt to many bridges the November elections is over the republicans have finally won water loo and now the country is gridlocked and nothing to compromise we can all wait as the superpower nation America focuses on the 2012 elections that's what it's all about right winning the election?
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
4 Nov 10
So you believe that gridlock is a good thing for this country? That nothing should be accomplished until after the 2012 election? Yeah, that's real smart.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
5 Nov 10
Those few suggestions alone will create a problem for these new members of congress who have to keep in mind that they can be voted out as quickly as they were voted in. There are citizens in this country who support "Obamacare"...who need healthcare and cannot get it elsewhere...so defunding that alientates them. Cutting military spending at this time will alienate many as well...especially members of the military and their families. Just curious, why would you want to end all capital gains taxes? That does not automatically create jobs.
@mattic (282)
• United States
5 Nov 10
No one in the USA is being denied healthcare. Military spending is a bullet (no pun intended) we will have to bite as being the world's police force is not our job. Cutting capital gains taxes would give business owners more money to invest in their businesses, thus creating more jobs. Besides, it is their money - not the government's and certainly not their fellow citizens'. A failure to implement hard and strict budgetary measures will surely result in their quick ouster. The host can only serve so many parasites and the current administration is intent on adding more daily.
@Maggiepie (7816)
• United States
5 Nov 10
READ MY LIPS: NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! One should never imagine one can come out ahead when making a deal with the devil. Socialists are satanic tools, inch by inch ripping tear away our Constitution, removing liberties, taxing us into oblivion--what--is the record not clear enough? If there's any "compromising" to be done, make them do it! Maggiepie “Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it.” ~ George Bernard Shaw (Possibly the only thing about which I've ever agreed with GBS)
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
3 Nov 10
You paint with a pretty broad brush. Regardless of the party in *power*, an inability to "reach across tha aisle" on all matters, so that something is actually accomplished, leaves this country with yet another do nothing legislature and *that* is not good for the American people.
• United States
6 Nov 10
I don't think there's anything wrong with listening to all sides, but the voting public have told those elected what they want and if any compromise takes the party away from what the voters want, I can't imagine those elected will keep their jobs very long.
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
7 Nov 10
I don't remember the word, "COMPROMISE," being brought up for the past two years. Why bring it up now? With whom should the republicans compromise, the democrats or the people? The democrats certainly didn't compromise with the people nor the republicans when they had the House majority. Now they want compromise. I hope the republican will listen to all sides, unlike the democrats, and not have the, "We won," attitude that the democrats had.
• United States
4 Nov 10
It depends on what they compromise on. If they compromise on a plan that will goes against cutting our debt and/or creates bigger government than they will get voted out. They were voted in to stop those things. It all depends on the will of the voters. Our elected officials are suppost to be the voice of the people who voted them in...so they need to BE their voice and vote and compromise according to the will of the people of their state/district.
@epicure35 (2814)
• United States
14 Nov 10
No way "reach across the aisle"! That's a democrat ploy to do their bidding. Republicans should NEVER compromise with this most corrupt traitorous democratic party ever in power. Republicans must remove the usurper the democrats committed treason to put in power so they could win an election at horrific cost and sorrow to the American people. Republicans must stop trying to be deomcrats, must clean up their own act and must now try to recover and restore our nation. NO COMPROMISE WITH THE DEVIL OR THE DEMOCRATS.
@millertime (1394)
• United States
7 Nov 10
It shouldn't even be up to the Republicans to compromise at this point. The Democrats certainly haven't made any effort to compromise in the last two years. As a matter of fact, the Dems have been totally partisan and have ignored all attempts by the Republicans to have any input in the process at all. They should move ahead with the agenda the American people have just demonstrated they want. It's up to the Democrats to ask for compromise now but they won't. They will still want everything their way and their way only. Take the healthcare bill for example. A good compromise would be to keep some of the sections that are good and scrap the sections that serve special interests or don't do anything but cost money and expand government. But the Democrats won't want to change it at all. They will want to keep it the way it is, their way. How can the Republicans compromise when the other side won't give an inch? It will be interesting to see what happens now, but I don't think there will be much reaching across the aisle, at least not for a while.