Do kids have to be entertained all the time?

entertaining kids all the time - kids and new gadgets
@bounce58 (17387)
Canada
November 24, 2010 5:20pm CST
I was watching TV last night and there was an ad about some new gadget or toy that just came out. The mom on the commercial was saying that it helps her because this new gadget keeps her kid entertained on the cart while she does her grocery shopping. My question is: where does it say that kids need to be entertained all the time? Now, I get that we need to keep the kids pre-occupied with something so we can do all our chores. What I don’t get is why we have to give them something? And why is it that there is so much importance at having them entertained all the time? When I was young, I remember getting bored out of my mind when mom was grocery shopping. Or getting impatient in the car when we went out for long drives. Sometimes me and my brother would play games during these ‘down’ times to keep ourselves entertained. We didn’t have any gadgets or toys. How about you? Do you keep your kids entertained all the time? If you do, why? If it comes down to it, is it just to get them out of the way, so you can be in your own world?
3 people like this
16 responses
@jazel_juan (15747)
• Philippines
25 Nov 10
there is nothing wrong with entertaining them, it is keeping them occupied and happy. do you have a kid?? because if you do you will know why. i have 3 and i need to keep the occupied and happy or else they will be like tails following me and i wont get any work done at home. so do you have a kid? and you will be able to answer why.
1 person likes this
@shaggin (71659)
• United States
25 Nov 10
Well I have two kids and I can see what the discussion poster is saying. Kids need to learn to occupy themselves without having to be staring at a tv or making you play with them constantly. If you have 3 kids they should also be able to play with each other. I can say that if kids get bored they tend to get into mischief so its good to keep them busy with at least crafts or something but it doesnt have to be all the time they need to learn to play by themselves.
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
8 Dec 10
Yes I do have kids. A ten year old and a four year old. And I get what you're saying that they need to be preoccupied so I could get things done too. But it doesn't have to be gadgets all the time. And like what shaggin is saying, if you have 3, then they could certainly come up with something to entertain themselves.
@dorannmwin (36392)
• United States
7 Dec 10
I really don't think that children need to be entertained all the time. I think when they are completely busy with things that aren't engaged with their parents to a certain extent, then they are missing lessons that they need to have in their lives. Yes, some of the more adult things that we do in our lives are things that aren't really interesting to children, but I really think that without these lessons through observation, the adjustment to becoming an adult is something that would be more difficult for a child to make.
1 person likes this
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
9 Dec 10
I think that is one drawback of these electronic gadgets that kids are fond of these days. It takes away a few leaning opportunities for them as they grow up. Imagination, discipline, and to some extent even some social skills. A balance is always needed, and this is where we come in as parents.
@shaggin (71659)
• United States
25 Nov 10
My 3 year old son always wants to take cars with him when we go shopping. That was his own doing I didnt take toys with us shopping when he was little to keep him busy. He just sat in the cart and behaved. Nows another story though lol hes become a monster running off and screaming if I try to make him sit in the cart. I think its good for kids to learn to entertain themselves though to answer your question.
1 person likes this
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
8 Dec 10
I think my younger son started off like that too. With just a small toy car in his pocket. Just sitting in the cart, content at pointing at stuff on the shelves. Now that he's grown up a bit, he's always running around with his big brother to where the candy shelves are!
@cynthiann (18602)
• Jamaica
25 Nov 10
My sister and I were talking about this just yesterday.We made our own entertainment. We rehearsed and put on plays and practised our tap-dance routines. We made our own enjoyment. No television but we listened to the radio programmes for children. And they had serials too on the radio and we could hardly bear the excitement to wait to hear what happened next week. Saturday morning was the children's cinema and we had a sing along before the movie began. And then come rain or shine we went for walks. Yep -went for long walks. Answer: No they do not have to be entertained all the time they must learn to develop and use their imaginative skills
1 person likes this
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
8 Dec 10
I guess we are a bit 'luckier' growing up because we had siblings. Me and my brother also didn't have too much in terms of toys, but we always found things to entertain us. Whereas you had plays and tap-dance routines, we had empty cans, strings, old tires etc. Things that the kids of today wouldn't even think of as toys! We had imaginative minds back then.
@JenInTN (27514)
• United States
27 Nov 10
Heyya bounce..I don't think that children should be readily entertained all the time. They come to expect constant excitement then. I also read that boredom was a way to develop the imagination...they will make up something to do or actually go outside to play..lol.
1 person likes this
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
8 Dec 10
I think that's how I grew up. With a dash of boredom here and there. So me and my brother were left to our imaginations to come up with some silly game to amuse us. I can't say the same for today's kids, as there are a lot of distractions available that come in the form of electronic gadgets.
• Canada
26 Nov 10
There is a huge difference between a child being occupied and being passively entertained. I can say for myself, that I could never just "sit down and shut up" for an hour because someone else needs to get something done. Children need to come with us to the grocery store for safety reasons, but it is so boring for them and we expect them to just be passive and quiet, when our own attention spans wouldn't allow us to do that in a similar situation -- we would be reading a newspaper or having a conversation or something. So, do I think kids should be passively watching tv all the time to keep them entertained? No. But children should not be ignored if there is nothing they can make a game of (like when they are stuck in a grocery cart.) At home they can play imagination games with their toys and engage their brains, but that can be hard to do when out running errands. At the grocery store, it is good to have a conversation with your kids, teaching them new words, like names of exotic fruits or ingredients in a food. And they can help you add up the total of your grocery bill if you round the prices to easy whole numbers. "Ok, so we have 12 dollars of stuff in the cart, and this thing costs 3 dollars, so how much does the stuff in the cart cost now?" My parents used to do this with us, and it kept us occupied while working on our math skills!
1 person likes this
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
8 Dec 10
Although my parents never played that game with us, I think I would have loved to play along because I like puzzle games like that. And you've hit the nail on the head on making the kids come up with imagination games. As these gadgets may be colorful and exciting, I'm sure it doesn't help the kids much in fueling their imagination. Thanks.
@trixyteddy (1070)
• India
25 Nov 10
No way...i did not do it...and would not tell anyone else to do it. Children have to be taught to be independent. Yes, we play with them for sometime, love them, do their chores when they are really young...but as they are growing teach them to be independent....
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
8 Dec 10
I guess independence is part of the skills that doesn't fully develop when kids learn to be dependent on gadgets to entertain their minds. In a way, they wouldn't be able to think for themselves, and would always require a tool to help them face tasks as they grow. Thanks.
• United States
25 Nov 10
I think it all comes down to the times we live in. Back in the day ,most mom's were stay at home moms and they would make the time to play with their kids and if there were down times , mom would say go out and play. and we did , All day . Without a chaperon!Or my mom would say , if I were bored , it was my own fault and find something to do.But if I were Still bored it was ok. It was just a lazy day. You are talking to a girl who Loved long car trips. all I needed was a radio and I was good. No video games or DVDs! These days , both parents are working outside the home. They don't have the time to play with the kids and parents are so busy with their own projects they prefer that the kids were " out of the way." so games and DVD's are great. Anything that keeps the child quiet is used so they can get a chore like shopping done! A good DVD will keep kids from asking " Are we there yet?" And video games keep a child safe at home, not playing outside on those dangerous streets.
1 person likes this
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
8 Dec 10
Hi Sarah. Your comment about enjoying long car trips made me think of my childhood too. Sitting at the back of the car on long drives, with my brother, trying to come up with some silly games to pass the time. We didn't need gadgets then. But I was a bit lucky, because I had a brother who was just a year younger than me. He was my ultimate gadget! Although we'd always end up hitting each other, we were always entertained! As I read your comment fjaril, I was holding my BB -my own gadget! How true that we need these gadgets now in this rat-race society. But I think I'll give myself a pass, as I also grew up with nothing. And that being all grown up, I deserve some toy that I didn't have when I was young. Even though the games I play with it are just 'connecting-games' with family half-way around the world.
1 person likes this
@Hatley (163781)
• Garden Grove, California
25 Nov 10
hi bounce no they sure do not and when I was Little we made our own fun and played counting games with each other when on long trips. we had a minimum of toys as it was during the depression years and my dad was the town doctor who got paid a lot of times in produce or meat, milk or eggs. we sure never went hungry as we had a farm and large gardens and fruit trees so our own fresh veggies and fruit,meat,eggs and milk of course.so I was brought up to be thrifty and I carried this on through raising my own family.I did not keep my kids entertained all the time. we had a television and books and that was it. I gave our son a record player when he was young and he bought dozens of records then in his teens he got a recorder but my children learned to entertain them selves and we had books to to foster reading.My son grew up in the electronic age and earned his own money for various electronic gadgets then came a computer and he was in heaven.,but he is also frugal in his thinking too. kids do not ghave to be mechanically entertained if they have imaginations and a lot of love.more children need attention and love from their parents than more stuff to entertain them with.they had the usual toys like legos and things like that but they were to push then into u sing their imaginations, ..
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
8 Dec 10
This point was brought up in a similar response above. I think that for us who grew up with not too many gadgets, we've learned to think for ourselves and have some imagination. I think some great minds are borne out of this upbringing. So, it worries me a bit to think the younger kids now who are entertained only by electronic gadgets are to grow up not knowing how to think for themselves.
• India
26 Nov 10
Interesting discussion point you have raised.I think that most of the parents try to keep their kids occupied with something so that they are not a hindrance to the parents' work.While keeping kids entertained is not totally wrong, it ought to be balanced and purposeful.Now if the parent is going to do some household chore, I think in certain ways, especially for somewhat grown up kids, the parent could involve the kids also.This would bring a fun element into the chore and at the same time,teach the kids something about house keeping and it's importance.So the key is getting the child involved and not keep him away in his own world all the time.
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
8 Dec 10
Ideally, that's what would I want to. To get them involve in some of the chores, in the hopes that one day, we can delegate this out to them. Unfortunately, kids being kids, have different ideas. But it would be great if they can entertain themselves without the use of any gadgets.
@shia88 (4571)
• Malaysia
25 Nov 10
Hi, I am also a mother and I do agree that kids need to have something to entertain them most of the time. When I need to do some housechores and cooking or other things at home, I need to make sure my son is entertaining by something like watching his favourite cartoon,playing some toys or reading books. At least,he is busy with something else to keep his time on and then I can concentrate to do my own things. In between, I have to keep an eye on him too. But I do read from my friends' blog about letting their children playing with Ipad,I don't see the point of getting those expensive gadget for children. I prefer to get those educational computer toy or some educational toy for my son. Or story books are good for children.it help to build uop a good habit of reading. Because I only have one son,that is why he does not have any accompany at home to play with him except me and his daddy. So to keep him entertained when I was busy with something else at home, I have to get him some schedule on what he is going to do everyday.
1 person likes this
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
8 Dec 10
I think giving your son a schedule of what to do everyday is a good training for children. It will organize his mind and give him discipline in life as he grows up. And I agree that you don't need expensive gadgets for that. Thanks.
@hushi22 (4928)
25 Nov 10
i dont think it's good to have them entertained all the time. i notice some children who are always entertained even in public places that later on annoy other people. i think kids also need to understand how discipline works.
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
8 Dec 10
I think you have a point in there hushi22. Some kids who are always have their heads on electronic gadgets don't learn enough social skills that they tend to annoy people when they grow up. There always needs to be a balance of entertainment and social training.
• United States
25 Nov 10
Our children must be a priority at all times and we should do all that ends all when it comes to our kids. Naturally we can't be there one hundred recentness of the time, but we must find ways to keep them busy. As if we do not keep them busy the bad influence will certainly take over. I never thought about getting them out the way, but simply when I was way too busy with work I would make sure they were in sports and of course I went to each and every one of their games.
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
8 Dec 10
My kids also have their sports activities. And like you, I would rather have them in these productive environments than doing nothing, or getting themselves involved in bad habits. Thanks.
@yanyanyow (326)
• Philippines
25 Nov 10
for me, though im still not a parent, kids need to be entertained. if you want to do chores such as grocery shopping, you can only concentrate when your kid is doing something rather than keep on bugging you and keep playing around the grocery area. this is the best way to keep your child from doing naughty things especially if he/she have not someone to play with. you can do your chores properly and on time and at the same time your kid is having fun on whatever he is doing.
1 person likes this
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
8 Dec 10
Hello yanyanyow. You just have to remember that if your objective is to get them off naughty things, your means of entertainment should also be educational. That could be good for their development. Goodluck!
@cher913 (25782)
• Canada
25 Nov 10
they shouldnt be because then they dont learn how to entertain themselves. they always rely on other people and things to entertain them and have no imagination of their own.
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
8 Dec 10
You bring up a good point. About thinking for themselves, and having an imagination of thier own. I am thinking, that's one of the reason why we have great minds in our generation. Because bright minds use their heads. How would the kids of today top that? If they always have it easy. Thanks.
@2004cqui (2812)
• United States
24 Nov 10
That was marketing that tried to convince you of that! Nothing is worse than giving a child a toy only to see the child prefer the box it came in, unless you're an experienced parent. Teaching and talking to a child is far more rewarding than expecting a toy to do something!
@bounce58 (17387)
• Canada
7 Dec 10
I guess that's why there are people who are good at marketing. Because they can identify 'needs' like these, and they can suggest a product to fill it. I agree that teaching and talking is more rewarding to me, I'm just not sure that my kids agree with me on this one. Thanks.