News programs

@staria (2780)
Philippines
February 11, 2011 2:20am CST
Do you think that news programs nowadays are so focused on delivering bad news rather than good ones. Yes I know that they must deliver the most recent and up to date news but sometimes they report even the most simplest bad news like a motorcycle accident. I seldom hear good news on TV. That's why sometimes I prefer not to watch it anymore.
4 people like this
22 responses
@elmiko (6630)
• United States
16 Feb 11
i really don't like to watch the news as much as i use to either. it is mostly bad news from what i see. i think it has to do with ratings more then anything. i think people are more then likely to pay attention if something really bad is on the news. however, with such bad news reporting constantly i don't think the ratings will be as high in the future as i think alot of people will just get tired of hearing bad news right and left. the sad thing is alot of the bad news has nothing in common or of importance to many he watch it.
1 person likes this
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
15 Apr 11
true! it's more about the ratings to these networks. they wanted to be the first when it comes to breaking stories on bad stuffs that's happening around. yes, people do need to get informed but it's just so tiring. you hear killings everyday, even simple stuff and they tend to exaggerate, I really dont want exaggerated and untrue stories! irritating!
@iris17 (12)
• Philippines
12 Feb 11
I suppose one reason for this is that there are hardly any good news nowadays. And that's really sad. Just my opinion though.
1 person likes this
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
15 Apr 11
very true indeed, it is really hard to find good news to report about. With all the bad things happening everywhere. They are the most obvious ones. More people are doing bad things than the good ones.
@rsa101 (37952)
• Philippines
11 Feb 11
If you would be studying viewers behavior, you can observe that people tend to get their attention towards things that are reported negatively than the positive ones. Of course if you own a TV station you would want to get the interest of your viewers and you would follow what they are looking for in a news. That is why they are more focused on what the viewers are expecting to hear.
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
But followers aren't the only factor to consider right, i mean they are in the neutral side, so a balance of good and bad wouldn't hurt at all.
1 person likes this
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
I understand your point. I do not question their credibility or being neutral when delivering these news. But the comparison of good and bad news in terms of influx. I believe they are more good news out there, but they are just really not into it.
1 person likes this
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
I wonder when would that be as most people are happier w/ their fellow's unfavorable condition or bad situation. :(
1 person likes this
@carmelanirel (20942)
• United States
11 Feb 11
I think the news has already focused on the bad news due to bad news is more selling. Yes occasionally they do report good news, but they are limited on what they report. Though they are not suppose to, I have seen where reporters are bias and they don't report the whole truth. This is why I do my own research if I want the truth to a story..
• United States
14 Feb 11
That is what is so sad, people will believe anything just because it is on the TV or radio or even the internet. That is why I try to back up what I hear with reliable sources or look for more information..
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
To keep their viewers hooked they tend not to report the whole story. And sometimes do episodes of it. Yes, I agree that the public should at least verify these news before they actually believe it.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
Yes I agree that people are hooked with bad news because it's much more interesting and informative. But not all bad news are true but still people believe in it.
1 person likes this
• India
13 Feb 11
yes i agree with you that for most of the time tv news will deliver the bad news going on around the world,it is not good for the children,but one thing is news channels in the tv are there to let us know about the bad guys in our country and in world,it is for our sack to now the truth about the crime or bad happened and who is the criminal or bad guys reason for that bad thing happened there. if you don't care about them,or if you miss that news,the criminals will go in front of you,and you are helpless,for example if a criminal escaped and you don't no that news then how can you help police to inform you have seen him. then what for all the anti crime forces(police,special forces like FBI etc...) for and why they should strive for the good,every one should stragle for that and help police. and that is the reason why the news channels are always having news about bad thing
• India
14 Feb 11
it is correct but they should deliver complete details of a case they are explaining,that is why the reason they are stressing on the bad news tend to report them.
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
Of course watching the news for significant events have its useful aspects too, but what I would like to emphasize that they are delivering too much bad news and tend to report them over and over again.
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
15 Apr 11
they should completely lay out the facts and tend not to exaggerate. Sometimes I really hate the news when they are just reporting on an issue and then they try to dig everything out of the suspect like his personal life and everything.
@raj7shot (838)
• India
11 Feb 11
News - Television news is important for knowing all kind of information..
It is not true up to 75 percent.They are delivering so many good news too.Sometimes such dad things (as u mentioned) are also delivering. I think myself whether accident is bad thing to show.. I think it is not. Why? Many accidents are happening due to laziness and careless, by seeing this some can be careful while driving... This is 100 percent truth... Anyone there to disagree this!!!!!!
@raj7shot (838)
• India
14 Feb 11
This point i will agree with you...
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
15 Apr 11
and if news tries to exaggerate, it's like what the h*ck!
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
Yes, even bad news can be useful too. But delivering the same cases over and over again doesn't seem really helpful at all.
@Hatley (163781)
• Garden Grove, California
12 Feb 11
hi staria yes I know they do and sadly they claim they are giving us what we want, thats just a lot of malarkey as most people get sick of hearing all the bad news and would enjoy hearing some good news of oood things people have done. but they assume and so'we get bad news and sometimes its even exaggerated beyond belief.,
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
Yes, because they believe that this is what we want, but if they are really doing public service they should start giving light to this gloomy nation too.
@daeckardt (6237)
• United States
11 Feb 11
I guess that is why I gave up on watching the news years ago. Occasionally I would see a human interest story on some news program, but those were few and far between. It is far too depressing to look at that all the time so I almost never even turn on the tv or radio. I will occasionally look at yahoo headlines or the headlines in the news area here, but I seldom read the articles. Thanks for bringing this up!
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
I do browse for Yahoo! headlines too, but yes I have to eliminate opening up articles that aren't too good. I think it won't help me in my everyday life, unless of course it concerns me or if I think that it would help me in the future.
1 person likes this
@aerous (13434)
• Philippines
11 Feb 11
It seems like that, friend. Because it's hard to find a good story or good news to deliver to the public...
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
15 Apr 11
yeah, somehow true. w/ lots of bad things happening around bad news are easily captured, while the good ones are covered by the bad.
@ybong007 (6643)
• Philippines
11 Feb 11
We can't really blame the media. The people also plays a big factor on why more often only bad news seem to be given priority over the good news. That's because bad news catches our attention not that we want bad news bad out of curiosity. We also have to take into considerations that the media is a company that needs fundingtoo to operate so they need sponsors. Sponsors on the other hand will pay lot of money to get a slot on the most viewed news program. News program now will have to compete with other stations and in order for them to do that they have to look for news that would catch the viewers attention. So it's really just a cycle.
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
Yes, bad news catches more attention, but it wouldn't hurt to squeeze a couple of good news once in a while. We are already dumped w/ a lot of problems and most are in a hopeless situation. So digesting more of these news will not bring anyone hope.
@ybong007 (6643)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
SO far, news programs squeeze good news too for a breather. It's just that there are more bad than the good worthy to be aired on TV. Bad news should also be seen as a way so we can avoid those from happening in our lives but it seems that the more we see it, the more apathetic people become that it became more of the norm. Just take rape for example, before this kind of news enrage people but that's no longer the case anymore, people who hears this kind of news no longer reacts and just feel pity for the victim and forget about it as soon as a new report comes.
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
Correct, we arent surprise if these "bad" things happen over and over again since we always hear them in the news. On the other hand, yes, we should be aware and news plays a big role in informing the people, no question on that. It is just that they tend to research and report more bad news. Good news are delivered last among all other news and in limited numbers.
• United States
13 Feb 11
News is given only on what the stations want us to know. Most of the time, it's not on the items of news that we need to hear about. It's almost that our society is turning socialistic because we're only hearing what they want us to hear. It's not good!
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
I believe as well that they are not delivering the whole story. They sometimes hold them and keep the public hooked, then they will reveal the "big" expose.
• United States
11 Feb 11
So true and I often wonder if they think that unless it is bad they would not get so many views. It would be nice to hear more about the good then the bad, but unfortunately the good is highlighted as much as the bad news is unfortunately.
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
To think that the good ones were actually reported after all the bad has been delivered, it just reflects that they give more importance to the bad rather than the good ones. Sometimes they do not prioritize in terms of the most up to date ones but they deliver the most controversial ones first.
@globaldoc (858)
• Philippines
12 Feb 11
Yes, because everything is about money and business. Bad news become such an attraction that most people would like to read bad news, especially the very very absurd ones.The more violent and bad news, the more readers, and the more readers, the more buyers, then the more buyers, the more money. Its that simple, and it is not a pretty situation actually.
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
Sometimes I think it is really not about the bad news per se, but the way they tend to dramatize their reports. Sad thing that money controls everything. Even the thing that we should be most confident about like broadcasting.
@stk40m (1119)
• Koeln, Germany
11 Feb 11
I think the bad news have to be broadcasted but the thing is that all news channels air the same stuff. Sometimes when I'm zapping through the channels it seems that there's only one programm running but with differen logos. I think there should be different news channels that focus on different topics like politics, environment, people, war, crime etc and of course good news topics :-) That would be more useful imo.
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
lol, observed that too. They all deliver the same sh*t. I sometimes think that they aren't really concerned about the people per se, but rather more concerned about their ratings and popularity.
@zenki08 (700)
• Philippines
11 Feb 11
I think the main concept of news today is to deliver mostly bad news. Sorry to say but that is the reality of things now. There are more bad news than good news. But sometimes what makes the news worse is how the media exaggerates the news. So a small scratch becomes a fatal wound.
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
They do exaggerate to multiply their viewers. Sometimes if you will observe their previews, they will tend to post questions that will keep the public hanging. But when you watch the news the conclusion would be otherwise.
@beamer88 (4259)
• Philippines
11 Feb 11
You're right, it has become some sort of tabloid reporting, focusing on accidents, rape, robberies and deaths. Oh, and of course showbiz news as well. I guess those are the types of stories that sell. News programs haves become a lucrative business for these giant networks to the point that sometimes I feel their sense of public service is distorted. Nowadays, I rarely watch the news on the local channels. Usually, I glance at the headlines and if there is nothing substantial or newsworthy, I change the channel and watch informative shows like those shown on Lifestyle Network or National Geographic or a good movie on HBO :)
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
You're right, news nowadays had became a crowd-pleaser. Even news about politics are given a colorful output, especially when dealing w/ our President, they always tend to report about his lovelife, rather than focus solely on his performance.
@megamatt (14292)
• United States
11 Feb 11
Sadly, I have come to one simple conclusion. No much how much we hate seeing bad news, no matter how much it distressing the vast majority of us to see such a thing. We are going to be drawn by such a thing in a strange, disturbing way. It is almost like we don't like to watch this but at the same time, we are strangely compelled to the point where we just are going to stick around to see if it can get any worse. Over the years, news stations have really pushed the bounds on the "let's see how bad we can make this out to be." Therefore bad news is going to just get the interest of some people and that means ratings. The news has become a television business and good news might make us feel warm and fuzzy inside, but it is not going to have the same impact for the television viewers. Of course, I avoid the news a lot of the time and when I am back to checking it out, I am reminded of why I normally avoid it.
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
Even if we do not want to, we are compelled because in reality we have to know what's happening around the metro. But do we really have a choice? We do not hold whether they will or will not deliver good news or more bad news.
@lady1993 (27225)
• Philippines
11 Feb 11
I think one of the reasons, is that there are much more bad news happening, really- so there aren't not much good news to report anyway. And I also think that people are more inclined to listening to bad news, they're more interested in that.
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
The viewing public is a big factor of course, they should be able to satiate their followers expectations.
@yspmyl (3435)
• Malaysia
11 Feb 11
You are right, most of the news are bad news, accident, stealing, rape, killing and many more on news programs everyday. Good news are rare where it rarely happen everyday. That is what life is.
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
Good news are rare I agree, but I believe that they are still evident. If they report even the most non-sense bad news there is, I think they are just not researching enough good news that are available.
@gloryacam (5540)
• Philippines
11 Feb 11
It's sad that news programs report a lot more bad news than good news. The sadder thing is that maybe there's just not much good news to air on TV.
@staria (2780)
• Philippines
14 Feb 11
In reality and it's sad to say, there are indeed more bad news to deliver rather than the good ones. If Pacquiao will not win a fight, there won't be any good news at all! lol! :)