disbarred!!

@epicure35 (2822)
United States
April 22, 2011 1:17pm CST
Mmmmm.....Both of them? Why, yes, 2 out of 2 = 100%. In 1993, Michelle Obama surrendered her law license, after only four years of "practice". Details, of course, UNAVAILABLE, as with all things Obama, shrouded under cover of darkness, like all of his vital records. Speculation may lead us to the Feb. 13, 2009 Chicago Tribune article re the U of Chicago "healthcare" patient-dumping scheme, conceived by Michelle Obama, David Axelrod, and Valerie Jarret. It seems a 12 year-old black boy named Dontae Adams, having been mauled by a pit bull and having his lip ripped off went to the U of Chicago hospital for treatment. Per the healthcare scam hatched by Ms. O and minions, he was denied treatment, except for asprin, and his mother had to take him on a long bus ride to another hospital where surgery was performed. Of course, the hospital was made "fall guy", the schemers not held openly accountable. As to the putative, de facto "president', in 2008, while his "presidential campaign" was being produced, directed, orchestrated, and choreographed, by the fools in Hollywood, he was in a Chicago courtroom one day, "surrendering" his law license. Hardly an "opportune" or convenient time! Again, mystery and cover-up. However, one factual reason is that he never declared his many aliases. Even my insurance agent has to do that in order to get a license! While many moronic liberals want to assure a naive public that both were "voluntary surrenders" (sounds oxymoronic to me, but fitting for morons to defend), my husband, as a lawyer himself, assured me that attorneys NEVER volunteer to give up their licenses. Pay attention, folks. We're talking criminal behavior at all levels, culminating in treason and sedition.
6 responses
@dark_joev (3043)
• United States
22 Apr 11
This is False someone just made this stuff up. Bill O even points this stuff out Ms. O never surrendered her legal license she just went on inactive status as she is the first lady. That is the same with Obama. If you got an issue with Obama's agenda go after that but to try and paint some massive conspiracy is crazy. Obama deserves to be respected as a person and well also as a human he also deserves to be treated fairly and judged by his policies which aren't all that different that Republicans and Democrats before him.
2 people like this
@epicure35 (2822)
• United States
28 Apr 11
DARK, wrong again. Michelle Robinson Obama " voluntary surrendered" her law license in 1993, well before hubby usurped office. I am looking directly at a copy from ARDC(Attorney's Registration and Public Disciplinary Record), an agency of the Supreme Court of Ill. which, under Lawyer Search, states, among other things, 'ATTORNEY IS ON COURT ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS". This kind of "voluntary inactive" usually occurs just before one's license is suspended because of something one has been accused of. An excellent example is the Bill Clinton "voluntary surrender" of his law license after he was convicted of making a false statement in the Monica Lewinsky case. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2308476/posts also reported at WorldNet Daily, August 4, 2009 Robin Masters article
@jbrooks0127 (2326)
• United States
22 Apr 11
As with so many other articles like this it is of course is bogus. There is no truth whatever to it. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
1 person likes this
@yoyo1198 (3643)
• United States
22 Apr 11
And this is just the beginning of the presidential campaign gauntlet run. Can you imagine what we're going to be inundated with as we get closer to November 2012?
1 person likes this
• United States
22 Apr 11
And the thing that bothers me the most is this can and often does influence people in the way they vote. I can't think of anything that is worse for a democracy than to have people vote based upon complete lies and mis-representation. It happened this last election and it will be even worse in 2012. We all have our mistaken certainties but when things like this are constantly being sent around it colors everything. The worse part of it all is we all will pay the price for it.
@epicure35 (2822)
• United States
22 Apr 11
jbrooks, et. al. "Snopes" is, in fact, none other than a liberal couple, David and Barbara Mikkelson, who live in the San Fernando Valley, an enclave and bastion of those with little to no wisdom and a hard core agenda. They started the site in 1995.
1 person likes this
@bobmnu (8160)
• United States
22 Apr 11
Like the Birther issue this is a distraction from the policies and programs this President has introduced. Lets talk about policies and programs and what is right and wrong with them. If he is forced to resign who do you think will take over - VP Biden. What then attack him and dig up dirt on him. The policies that you don not like continue and they win.
1 person likes this
@dark_joev (3043)
• United States
22 Apr 11
I don't think I agree with you that often but I have to agree with your post right here
@epicure35 (2822)
• United States
28 Apr 11
bobmnu, the BC issue itself is a total distraction (taqiyya - permissible lying in order to deceive, distract, disarm and vanquish an enemy). BHO is ineligible totally because he fails the first threshhold test of being a natural born citizen, the son of two us citizen parents.
@gewcew23 (8011)
• United States
22 Apr 11
I understand that you oppose the Obama's and the Obama administration, but making up stuff shows what depths of depravity you and your ilk will sink to. I do oppose the Obama administration when the there is reason to oppose, but I will make my stand on something call evidence. Evidence maybe you have heard of this word? It is what rational people base the claims on. The burden of proof needs to be meet by the person who is making the claim, so show us your proof that backs up your claims.
1 person likes this
@epicure35 (2822)
• United States
28 Apr 11
see my response to dark.
• United States
22 Apr 11
The following ARDC link shows that Michele Obama was on a court ordered inactive status That sounds as if she too has something to hide, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2308476/posts As far as Ibn Barack Hussein Obama is concerned to follow is said about him: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer." He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you "voluntarily surrender" your license five seconds before the state suspends you. http://www.usmessageboard.com/law-and-justice-system/157491-obama-no-lawyer.html Let's face it folks Barack and his Missus are both rather unsavory characters. They are a fine pair to be representing our country. No wonder we are going to the dogs.
@dark_joev (3043)
• United States
22 Apr 11
Sorry no evidence Obama was trying to escape anything. He could return to practicing law if he so choose as he is inactive by his own free will as for Ms. Obama can't really say what happened. Not that it really matters as it doesn't show what Obama's character is.
@epicure35 (2822)
• United States
28 Apr 11
Thanks, whiteheather for injecting some truth into this discussion. We are dealing with criminals of the worst kind and a population in our own country that simply does not care at all for truth or justice.
1 person likes this
@Netsbridge (3242)
• United States
23 Apr 11
Government offices are the best hideouts for hardcore criminals! By the way, Barack H. Obama is a political conservative - individuals often identifiable by their love for endless wars.