28 Jul 11
Hi nakula, and where working mothers should be your opinion to let their children during working hours? home alone? playing under the desk in the office? So true! against a competent, well-chosen day, mother (or father) is nothing wrong: the main thing is, it is a reliable person and not constantly changing - and the group is not too large so that enough space for all. that does not mean that the mother has absolutely nothing to do with her child! presumably you mean, a mother with small children should just work to care for their children INSTEAD? it was better for the child and also to reward the work . no cost for child care? - As I said, a good non-family child care no harm. and before the mother at home "soured" and is unhappy (not all born to be matron), she is a better and more relaxed mother, if she also has a working life. - Mind even think that it's harder to get back into a job, the longer you were out there, how long they should stay , to the school? until graduation? even if a part of the credit for child care "on it goes," it is worth it: to earn anything, and the connection not to be missed. have to justify why working mothers always that they want to work again (or, imagine, even must)?
30 Jul 11
Hello Gen, You're right, without seeing some cases that are bad for children's development, economically it would not hurt. And that makes me think this far if it will not affect the psychological state of children? I do not mean to discredit a particular party. Great day my friend
30 Jul 11
For me, an indication that a title such as Professor at any rate does not protect against stupidity. What is to pass from this program, children in such institutions, we see in eastern Germany, where we encounter the results with the club in his hand on the streets again.
30 Jul 11
Although this is now the common reading and viewing, since out of the women's years as arguments. That does not mean that it would be good for the mental development of a child. It can only be the second best solution in cases where there is no other choice because no matter how cheerful divorce, or from the beginning only one-parent family, everything probably is not exactly optimal. Ideally, a man takes over the responsibility of marriage for the family to provide material, so that the wife must not have a job. This means, of course, stand for life and not to leave after a few years, the family, which plunges the wife and children into material shortages. But today the least understood and one can see where the "modern" thinking and living will. Broken families and people everywhere. However, I am aware that improvement can be expected to no longer here. The old values ??are gone and the new are not good really, all window dressing. Sorry