mission: impossible - ghost protocol....wasted time and money..
By KOSTAS499
@KOSTAS499 (1624)
Greece
January 7, 2012 6:08am CST
Anyone seen it? OK, I understand that there have to be some visual effects, but that was ridiculous!!! Cruise was not an agent he was The Highlander. I was watching but my mind was somewhere else. I wasted two hours for a stupid movie. The fist two MI were far better.
3 people like this
4 responses
@inertia4 (27961)
• United States
9 Jan 12
Isn't that how it always is anyway? I mean, they make movies and then kill them with all those sequels. They should learn to leave well enough alone. It seems to me that hollywood does not have an original bone in their bodies anymore. They keep remaking movies and making TV shows into movies. They should come up with something new. Thats why I like independent movies much better.
@KOSTAS499 (1624)
• Greece
10 Jan 12
1 or 2 sequels is not bad, but as you say it has its limits.
2 people like this
@koperty3 (1876)
•
7 Jan 12
I don't like Tom Cruise. I can't stand this guy and his fake smile. If I can I avoid films, in which he plays any role. This is sad that they don't make new productions just make series like Saw 6 or Final Destination 5. I think one day they will make MI 11. That will be the end of Human talents and imagination.
1 person likes this
@KOSTAS499 (1624)
• Greece
8 Jan 12
Sequels produce money. So? I don't care too much for Cruise either, but I like the fact that he does his own stunts.
1 person likes this
@besweet (9862)
• Ireland
28 Jan 12
I was planning to watch this with my friend who is a big fan of action movies! This isn't really my kind of films and now you gave me one more excuse to avoid it! Thanks :)
