Sheriff Arpaio Provides Proof That Obama'a Birth Certificate Has Been Tampered

@Fatcat44 (1142)
United States
July 17, 2012 9:02pm CST
In today's press conference Sheriff Arpaio provided several reason why Obama's birth certificate has been tampered with and is fraudulent. He discovered a loophole in Hawaii's Stature 338-17.8 which had been revised recently that allows person's that is an established resident in Hawaii for a year and have paid taxes to register with a Hawaii born birth certificate. He pointed out that this is a national security threat that many foreigner could get Hawaii birth certificates. He has also pointed out that the certificate that was presented was not coded correctly to be valid. Hawaii's Deputy Attorney General states he has an original birth certificate on file in Hawaii, but it has not been brought forth. Also, he never confirmed that the released birth certificate information matches the original birth certificate. Sorry, I cannot paste yet. But you can see link below to get more. www.wnd.com/2012/07/arpaio-obama-probe-finds-national-security-threat
2 people like this
3 responses
• United States
19 Jul 12
You know what I find hilarious about this whole argument. Can't find amazingly good documentation of the birth certificate of the man people don't like as president. They scream fraud. Every other time the government screws anything up, it's typical government and the reason they shouldn't have to pay taxes.
@debrakcarey (19924)
• United States
19 Jul 12
I don't know about other people's motives, but here's mine; THE CONSTITUTION says ONLY a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN shall be elected to the office of president. As we have seen in our history, presidents set the tone for the country. Why did our framers, our founders say NATURAL BORN, as opposed to NATIVE BORN? (there is a difference legally) Because they were concerned over loyalty to the nation and its people. The Constitution has been slowly shredded over the last 100 years by those in office. To those who are now becoming concerned about this (finally) the 'election' of a man with 'divided loyalties' is the last straw, especially when observing his total disregard for the rest of the Constitution.
@debrakcarey (19924)
• United States
19 Jul 12
What we are seeing Knoodleknight, is that awakening we spoke of in other responses. People are waking up to the fact that the net of tyranny closing in around them. Not all are awake enough to realize that if a NON citizen rules over them unconstitutionally, then that ruler can do pretty much as he pleases. They are NOT AWAKE because they do not understand their rights and who they come from. They've been deceived by the educational system and a subtle culture of dependency for the last generation or more. Rest assured though, there is a ripple of awareness beginning, that is why this 'issue' will not go away easily.
• United States
20 Jul 12
So, since he was allegedly born in another country. What is that country, and why isn't anyone producing a birth certificate from that country?
@crossbones27 (20265)
• Redlands, California
14 Apr 13
I think we all need to stop responding to these types of posts. The only reason people do this is to get a rise out of people. Obviously these people do not care what facts are presented. They are just a bunch of haters. Then they wonder why the country is in such poor shape and its because people are wasting peoples time and money spreading this nonsense. Maybe Sheriff what's his name should worry about his own job than worrying about the President. Last I heard people pay him to protect and serve not to spread his hatred for the President. I will never get why people still keep voting people into these types of positions, but maybe that is why the state of Arizona is so backwards. Maybe that is why the Cartel are always reeking havoc on Arizona's borders. You get what you vote for Arizona.
@Fatcat44 (1142)
• United States
14 Apr 13
How about the facts that he is presenting?
• Redlands, California
14 Apr 13
You mean the made up facts. Sorry this has been brought to court in a red state and no judge was stupid enough to even entertain the thought. Even conservatives judges want nothing to do with this. What more proof do you need? I often disagree with people but if they have the facts on their side I will concede the point which is what many bithers need to do.
@Rollo1 (16686)
• Boston, Massachusetts
19 Jul 12
I read about this loophole in Hawaii a couple of years back, but no one paid much attention to anything that was said by people who were doubting the BC that was online. The media had complete control of the narrative when it came to these issues. Arpaio is paying heavily for his insistence on following these things up when the administration and the media wants these questions buried. I would like to see a full investigation done, and whatever the truth is, let it be established. At this point, what worries me most is four more years, closely followed by the ability of a president to completely seal any and all records pertaining to himself. I am also worried that the public is so willing to give up questioning and to attack those who don't give up.
@debrakcarey (19924)
• United States
19 Jul 12
What we need to do is institute governmental procedures to implement the Natural Born Citizen clause of the Constitution. At a state level, the secretary of state is responsible for doing this. The courts have not dismissed the evidence, they have been hampered because there is no law saying they have to see proof of natural born eligibility. Pelosi's attempt to cover up his ineligibility by certifciate of nomination shows that they are aware of the meaning of natural born, and is tacit admission that he is not. Not to mention that the Democrats have for the last decade or so been trying to change the requirement by amendment to the Constitution. There is a Supremem Court case that establishes what Natural Born means, and Obama does not meet that requirement according to that ruling. http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm •In Minor v. Happersett (1874), the Supreme Court defined two classes of persons. The first class consists of children born in the United States, of U.S.-citizen parents. The second class consists of U.S.-born children of non-U.S.-citizen parents. The Court used the term "natural born citizen" only in reference to members of the first class. Regarding members of the second class, the Court doubted they were even citizens, let alone natural born citizens. In the Court's opinion, natural born citizens are "distinguished from" aliens or foreigners, suggesting that a natural born citizen is someone who is not a "foreigner" (foreign citizen) at birth. it is not just a question of his birth certificate. The BC he released, IF it is legal and not a forgery says his father is NOT an American citizen. According to that Supreme Court ruling and other court rulings you can see on that link, he is a dual citizen at best. Then there is the question of his fraudulently (alleged) using a social security number illegaly. The question of his possibly applying for foreign aid as a student. His draft card being tampered with. The Congressional Research Service issued a legally binding document that stated NO ONE HAD SEEN OR HANDLED HIS PERSONAL DOCUMENTS, BIRTH CERTIFICATE before he was put on the ballots. (remember, Pelosi issued two differing certificates of nomination)Why didn't anyone vet him, because there is no law saying they have to see any documents proving eligibility. And that is the LOOPHOLE they used. That is the ONLY reason the Courts are not ruling on this, because there is NO LAW telling them what to do. Yet, they've passed a resolution on John McCain's eligibility while ignoring or ridiculing those who ask for the same with Obama. That alone ought to ring some alarm bells. But all we hear is 'insults and name calling'. Lies and more lies. Cover ups on top of cover ups. LOTS of SMOKE about to burst into flames. Conservatives in the states have attempted to pass laws requiring documents be produced but have been shot down by the left. Why this is important is because IF we are a REPUBLIC under the Constitution then we better make sure we operate in this most fundemental of ways by the Constitution. Or not. And if we chose NOT, we better be prepared to give up every protection we have under that Constitution from tyrants and despots.