Why are you not upset?

@debrakcarey (19887)
United States
September 26, 2012 1:54pm CST
Why are Obama supporters not upset over the million dollars owed in back taxes by members of his administration?
5 people like this
6 responses
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
27 Sep 12
The president's cabinet, his cadre of czars and the list of his advisers is so chock full of tax evaders that I think the IRS owes an apology to Al Capone. He told us to judge him by the people he surrounds himself with - then proceeds to surround himself with communists, terrorists and tax cheats. But as someone else pointed out, most people probably do not know this. Certainly, no journalists are holding Obama responsible or questioning any word that proceeds from his mouth. I am sickened by how easily the sheep are led.
3 people like this
• United States
27 Sep 12
You have said eXactly what I have been thinking and feeling!! For some little time now!! (It's not the first time either!) Reminds me, was going to zap to your profile yesterday, got interrupted..
2 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
27 Sep 12
Zap my profile? Will it hurt?
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
28 Sep 12
Many in the mainstream media are 'coming out' with less than nobel pieces on fearless leader, yet we still see the networks covering for Obama. Is Obama's house of cards falling?
• United States
27 Sep 12
They probably don't even know it.
3 people like this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
28 Sep 12
Could that be because the Mainstream media is not reporting anything that makes Obama look bad?
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
27 Sep 12
This site says it has to be embarrassing http://www.matchdoctor.com/blog_140803/36_Members_Of_Obama_s_Own_Executive_Staff_Owe_Nearly_1_Million_In_Unpaid_Taxes.html but I thought, why would it be embarrassing? who's gonna report it?? and who would listen if it was???
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
28 Sep 12
Wow, great site. Thanks for sharing. One article there said more people went on disability than found jobs in the last few years. Food for thought.
@laglen (19759)
• United States
28 Sep 12
liberal logic - do as I say not as I do. Just mark it down as yet another issue that the MSM won't talk about. Can you imagine asking Wasserman-Schultz about this. She would most likely claim that this is simply because George Bush was once president then go into Romney's comment about the 47%! lololol
@laglen (19759)
• United States
28 Sep 12
I can't imagine trying to deny it! haha Just keep sayin it, people will start believin it!
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
28 Sep 12
some will. others won't. I mourn for my people who are so uninformed they will march into hell for Obama.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
28 Sep 12
LOL Wasserman Shultz, even Obama can't stand her idiocy any longer. And I think it IS that the MSM won't talk about it. They're in the tank for Obama so deep it stinks. Many of the big names in network news are coming out and admitting there's a bias. The others look like fools for denying it.
1 person likes this
@clrumfelt (5490)
• United States
27 Sep 12
Obama supporters likely don't care how much back taxes the OA members owe just as long as they keep taking tax dollars from other people and giving handouts to them.
• United States
27 Sep 12
I have to say, I think there's, unfortunately, a lot of merit to that answer!
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
28 Sep 12
Why did the care so much about Romney's tax returns, his 'millions'? Which reminds me, Jon Stewart, Matt Laure, and David Lettermand made more than Mitt, but the left still loves them? Why the double standard? Could it be the candy coated mainstream media coverage of Obama's administration?
@lampar (7584)
• United States
27 Sep 12
May be his supporters don't really care much about the fact that national treasury department loss of revenue and short change by the administration members is because the end result will not ultimately affect badly on them except on the federally supported national programs for the needy. They are not upset over the back tax as they don't have any reason to behave in that way, the IRS is the one supposed to be upset, it is the one federal agency that is bleeding from these loss of revenue. hahahaha....
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
28 Sep 12
But it will hurt them, they just can't see that far down the road. We are poorly educated on just how things really work. That needs to change. Thanks Lampar.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
30 Sep 12
yes, it is. But I still call it corruption.