Controversial Discovery, Unearth!
October 7, 2012 5:38am CST
There are so many controversial discoveries of some dedicated archaeologist in the world that nullify the theory of Evolution, Ex. the discoveries of some sophisticate artifacts like some perfect sphere marbles, which are found some strata below where bones found which according to evolutionist are the bones of believed first humans. So the argument that evolution scientist tries in make stronger effort to hide the truth, because if these artifacts will be published then this theory will collapse. So how does this affects the credibility of some scientist who believes and uphold the theory of evolution?
2 people like this
7 Oct 12
Evolution theory is nothing but a waste of time, approx 150 years back Darwin came up with an idea that was a bit logical "then" but at this time if you start looking at some genuine websites, you'll find that it's impossible for this theory to be correct. I'll give you a few examples, they say, this Universe is approx 14 billion years old and our earth is only approx 5 billion years old, if you consider Probability as genuine maths, we can't deny the chances of existence of intelligent life forms in this universe even before our planet existed and if that is true, then imagine what kind of powers a civilization billion years ahead of us will have, wouldn't they have visited our planet? Here are a few proofs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_brothers (this page says we started flying only after 1903) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaim%C4%81nika_Sh%C4%81stra (This page says we did have a book before 1900 that has the description of planes that we don't even have today, you search for the pdf version of this book, you will get it) Such planes were seen in sky in Germany, Nuremberg in year 1561: https://unitedcats.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/himmelserscheinung_c3bcber_nc3bcrnberg_vom_14-_april_1561.jpg Look at the history of computer: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanism It was found in year 1901 and we could understand it only after 1970s but it was used approx 2000 years back, there are n number of such things that clearly tell you that this evolution theory in most illogical theory that we read in our textbooks.
8 Oct 12
With all these discoveries coming out and all the videos on youtube related to this, i am really getting confused, lol! The theory of evolution sort of bent toward the "probabilities" which i agree with above as to not being precise, but rather a hypothetical process that's need to be proven. But i guess, all boils to one thing to not get confused, FAITH!
8 Oct 12
What i meant was the Faith within you or myself, not confused with all these theories and stuff about the discoveries and all the probabilities. I guess I'm not really into knowing about how we all started and just base my existence on the norms of my FAITH.
8 Oct 12
Does it means that the controversial artifacts that are found are a valid proof that evolution is the big delusion?, well, other said that the usual response of evolutionist is like what you have said that "There is more to come", but since then centuries past, instead of relevant discoveries that validate evolution it is the opposite... As the youtube videos implies... :-)
• Sao Paulo, Brazil
17 Oct 12
I do think that they teach this theory because they want to believe that they are superior than other species, that they can do whatever they want and don't be punished by a God, that they want believe only on their eyes and even if the proof is saying that it is wrong, they see what they want to see. thank you for the discussion.
10 Oct 12
It doesn't affect their credibility in the least little bit. There are so many facts that support that evolution has happened and is an ongoing natural process that a silly YouTube video put together by a questionable source has no effect, Get over it. Evolution is scientific fact.