Champions league T20 or League for the Champions from India?

Tweet

Hi friends. just yesterday i was checking a certain cricket website and i came across a certain comment which made me start this discussion. this is the 4th season of champions league. countries like india,pakistan,sri lanka,australia,newzealand,england,south africa and west indies have sent their domestic T20 champions for this tournament.i think. now the teams. india - csk,mi,kkr & dd. pakistan - sialkot stallions. Srilanka - uva next. newzealand - auckland aces. England - hampshire & yorkshire. south africa- lions & titons. Australia - sydney sixers & perth scorchers. west indies - trinidad and tobago. so total of 14 teams out of which 8 teams qualify for the final 10 by some mystery ways. india,asutralia and south africa teams fill 8 out of 10 spots while the remaining 6 teams have to fight for the remaining 2 spots. during the previous editions,india sent the top 3 teams from its domestic league but this time they increased it to 4. guess what? while teams like pakistan,srilanka,newzealand and west indies which sent just one team have to fight for a spot in final 10, all 4 teams from india get there without any qualification round. why? now the big picture is 4 out of the final 10 is an indian team which means the indians teams have much better chance at winning the cup for the third time than any other country. i got a better idea. why instead of sending their top 4,they should sent their top 8 and make all other international teams fight for the remaining 2 spots? or better why not call this tournament that happens every september ICL or Indians Champions league?