Superhero Girl Friends

Yeah, I saw that in Entertainment Weekly. I don't know if the joke is on the people making the movies though. They may not be on screen for very long, but they are paid a bundle. Maybe being overpaid makes up for being under shown in the movies. That being said, I have only seen one Spiderman movie and none of the others. Although I do intend someday to see Thor.

For the most part the girl friends are just a side part of the movie and the superhero and the action are the main parts of the movie. So I understand why they would not be in the movies for a long period of time. And actually the 29 minutes for Emma Stone seems plenty long enough to me. For some the big name may have contributed to shorter times because of the money they would get but still the girl friend is just a side feature in these films. As far as overpaid goes, I think many of the so called super stars or big name actors(just like many sports figures) are overpaid. For some actors they have gotten where they are more on looks than on acting ability. I could name a long list but there would probably be disagreements from other people.

Well they have to put some characters in the movies which are important part of lives of superheroes in comics or graphic novels.In comics though there are many series so writer has lot of space to accommodate female characters you mentioned.But in movie the have 130-150 minutes ,so main focus is on Superhero,main villain and of-course the action scenes,best wishes.

I think the problem is either because of the script already wrote to be like that or maybe just brcause those actresses have a high pay rate. Or maybe they just don't care how long they will appear on that film, as long they are eing paid, and be on the screen.