Luis Suarez bite ban

Ireland
April 28, 2013 9:39am CST
For those of you who don't know about it Luis Suarez from liverpool bit Branislav Ivanovic from Chelsea I know i'm gonna be bias with this being a united fan but I think the ban was fair. I have heard liverpool fans saying it was his repuation preceeding him, well since he has bitten someone before....of course it should. That alone should give him the ban, I think 10 games is fair cause I probably could have said it would be longer but then I won't have an entirely balanced view on it. What are your thoughts on this?
3 responses
@adhyz82 (36249)
• Indonesia
29 Apr 13
i think it`s fair.. and liverpool didn`t appeal because they know it`s fair punishment..
@adhyz82 (36249)
• Indonesia
30 Apr 13
of course..it`s unforgivenable foul i think and liverpool as the big team know it violate their honour if they defend what suarez had done to ivanovic
• Ireland
30 Apr 13
And they know what happened last time they defended Suarez.
• Ireland
29 Apr 13
Either that or they knew they wouldn't get anything from appealing.
• Indonesia
29 Apr 13
yeah FA gave this player 10 games ban. and i think it's fair enough. what a pity when suarez lead the top scorer and than he banned from the games
• Ireland
29 Apr 13
Yeah it is a pity alright but it was also a pity that people had to see that. I mean for him it will suck not getting to play and people missing out on possible great moments but he does deserve it.
@sjlskl (3382)
• Singapore
28 Apr 13
The ban is definitely fair. Suarez is a serial chomper and he need to be punished heavily before he can start learning. It is frustrating that a player of his quality is always overshadow by his behaviour and sinister side.
• Ireland
28 Apr 13
Yeah I know it's so stupid. Balotelli was the same but at least he was entertaining ha ha.