Book Review D H Lawrence Lady Chatterleys Lover

Photo taken by me – my book shelves
Preston, England
March 10, 2018 9:44am CST
1928 Penguin Classics. One of literature’s most notorious and controversial erotic novels, and also one of the most tedious and dull reads imaginable. I like Lawrence but this is one of his worst books. The plot is very straightforward. Wealthy Clifford Chatterley is crippled in the trenches in World War One. His wife, Constance, unable to gain sexual satisfaction from him, establishes an affair with the working class gamekeeper, Mellors, who works on their estates. The neighbours, especially Mrs. Bolton, who respects Clifford, begin to get suspicious. Constance plans to have a surrogate baby to Mellors. She is due to go on a holiday in Venice with her sister and hopes to make out that she was impregnated during the break, She gets Clifford to agree to this idea, but it becomes obvious that her pregnancy has visibly had to have begun before she travelled. Gossip breaks out in her absence when Mellors’s estranged wife turns up making trouble for him in Constance’s absence, creating quite a scandal in the town. Though he had vaguely promised to stand by his wife if she got with child from another man, the scandal of her affair with the uncouth, working class gamekeeper starting before this invitation was made is too much for him, and Clifford decides to leave her. She ends up losing her aristocratic estate home and living in a dingy council property in Sheffield. The first half of the book deals with Lawrence’s condescending views on the working classes and the characters do little more than have lengthy conversations about socialism and wealth. There are some interesting comments on the decline of the colliery industry, but of course, the book mainly attracts people who want to read the sexual content. When the sex comes, it is poetic and powerful, but the long wait for it makes the book interminably difficult to read. The lovers begin to discuss their private parts as separate entities, and give them their own personalities, Lady Jane and John Thomas. Mellors is described in very down to Earth terms, but he is gruff, and sometimes insensitive. He often proves to be just plain downright rude to everyone needlessly, but he stands by Constance when all others, except her own father, abandon her. At one point, Constance tries to get a former admirer to take responsibility for her love child to be, but he just tries to blackmail Constance into posing for his paintings in the nude, which she declines to do. Unconvincing characters, dull political sermonising and precious little of the sex and bad language that was to get the book banned for so long and create one of the greatest court cases in British literary history. Anyone reading Lady Chatterley for pure titillation is going to be extremely disappointed. Arthur Chappell
11 people like this
10 responses
@JohnRoberts (109857)
• Los Angeles, California
10 Mar 18
I tried reading this and wondered why is this such a big deal? Better to watch the livelier movie versions.
2 people like this
• Preston, England
10 Mar 18
@JohnRoberts his other books are much better
1 person likes this
@Courage7 (19633)
• United States
10 Mar 18
Thanks Arthur, I had not read this either in all the years, but I know it is very famous.
2 people like this
@suripunj (956)
• New Delhi, India
10 Mar 18
i could not finish this book ,was thinking to sell it for free.
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
10 Mar 18
@suripunj I usually do pass novels on to others once I have finished them
@amadeo (111948)
• United States
10 Mar 18
I read the book and saw the movie
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (325348)
• Rockingham, Australia
11 Mar 18
I agree with your review. I found it long and boring - and couldn't work out what all the fuss was about.
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
11 Mar 18
@JudyEv it isn't his best work by any means
1 person likes this
@teamfreak16 (43421)
• Denver, Colorado
7 Apr 18
So that's where "John Thomas" comes from.
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
9 Apr 18
@teamfreak16 I expect the phrase existed before Lawrence used it
1 person likes this
@patgalca (18174)
• Orangeville, Ontario
10 Mar 18
I have heard of this book, of course, but have not been one to go back to older books. There are so many books, so little time. The story line you described actually sounds like something I would like to read. But alas, my book shelf is quite full. Thanks for the great review.
1 person likes this
@AKRao24 (27424)
• India
10 Mar 18
I already read this book when I was in college and I liked it then! could be because of the controversy I might have chosen this book to read! Since I am not a critic of literature I felt OK with the book! Thanks @arthurchappell!
1 person likes this
@RasmaSandra (73198)
• Daytona Beach, Florida
10 Mar 18
Nice review. Yes, I was once into the classics and tried to get through this book but put it aside quickly.
1 person likes this
@Kandae11 (53678)
10 Mar 18
A very famous book - probably because of the age in which it was published. I guess there was less promiscuity then.
1 person likes this