An incentive to criminals

@mydanods (6513)
Nigeria
March 13, 2018 9:08am CST
A criminal goes into a home to steal. Eventually, the house resists him. He shoots at the people there and commits murder. The police arrest him and he is sentenced. Sentenced to life in prison. But that life in prison involves free food, free accommodation and free access to the internet. He has all these for the rest of his life. Is the system not insane? Is this an incentive or punishment?
3 people like this
3 responses
@mlgen1037 (29886)
• Manila, Philippines
13 Mar 18
For real? Is this real? Because if so, maybe I should commit crime and get free access on everything. It is like I am being rewarded for doing something bad.
1 person likes this
@mydanods (6513)
• Nigeria
13 Mar 18
It's for real. The system sucks.
1 person likes this
@mydanods (6513)
• Nigeria
13 Mar 18
@mlgen1037 That's what I am talking about.
1 person likes this
@mlgen1037 (29886)
• Manila, Philippines
13 Mar 18
@mydanods here, if you are rich and you committed a crime, you will get special treatment but if you are just a regular guy, you wont get that at all.
1 person likes this
13 Mar 18
It's actually an insane offer. May be he has some good connections in the upper level of judiciary system. This kind of connection applies as a power these days after money.
1 person likes this
@mydanods (6513)
• Nigeria
13 Mar 18
It's what is obtainable in the high security prisons. Criminals are made to enjoy their stay. After all, they are only humans. That sucks to high heavens!
@munhozmib (3837)
• Sao Paulo, Brazil
13 Mar 18
Hey there, It is by no means an incentive. The system is not close to sane, but what it does to prisoner is not insane at all. I don't think the idea of the judgement is to play the God's rule, doing to the prisoner what the mass wants it to be done. It has happened before, it was like that. What did we have? Lots of brutal murders, public murders, injustice costed many innocent lives. And, if you believe in the Bible, it cost Jesus's life, as well. That was the system in which people believed sinners were too evil to be alive. The idea nowadays is different. The murderer is a dangerous civilian. Therefore, he cannot roam freely through the streets. What does the State do? Lock in, hence the word "prisoner". He is prived from freedom - he cannot leave a specific place. It's not free food, free accommodation or free access to the internet. It's an imprisoned life with few - if any - luxuries. No contact with the family, sometimes no chance to see the sunlight, no books to read, nowhere to go. Food and bed are the basic needs. Sometimes not even these are met. It's a pretty miserable life, if you allow me to say so. And it's not free: it costs. If prisoners aren't put to work to pay for their own expenses, then society as a whole is paying for these things. I don't think we should play the major rule of judging what happens to each other's life. As I said, it was like that before, and it didn't work out. I believe each individual should be looked upon - their reasons understood and, if there are absolutely no chances of recovering that human being and putting him back into society, then he should be left in prison, but producing something that could make the world a better place and with access to a modest life. If you were given the chance to have free food, free bed and a free toilet at the cost of your freedom and of all of your life objectives, I doubt you'd go there. It's the same thing that happens with homeless people - but that would give a rather new discussion. Thanks for bringing this topic up. Nice discussion you've got!
1 person likes this
@mydanods (6513)
• Nigeria
13 Mar 18
And nice explanation you provided there. I learned something new. No, I wouldn't trade my freedom for all those.