What if you were a paid actor who was commissioned to dispense lies on social media?

Dallas, Texas
July 10, 2018 6:47pm CST
Disinformation, as it called, or propaganda, is a tool some governments have used in history and probably still today, in parts of the globe, would indeed use actors who are fully capable of being anything you wanted them to be to influence the attitudes of the sheeples of the world, the peoples, those who believe the lies. How much of real news or fake news do you actually believe in the first place? So, given that we are faced with a multitude of articles on all forms of social media, there are often opportunities to put a spin on the facts and mis-inform people so as to create confusion, disparity, and ultimately, chaos in the doomoshpere, otherwise known as the world of doom and gloom. There are so few websites out there I can fully and with 100% certainty fully believe. The number one place online I believe that has the facts in check is supposedly the one that also has the fakes. Google, followed in second place with YouTube. They both have links to real news but also zillions of fake news posts. Facebook is trying to become more trusted and more true and less like a politically directed or motivated place as things get sorted out and walls have been taken down and new rules of proper conduct are worked out to insure a more positive and harmonious state of social media for all people no matter where they come from, what their status in life is or whatever they may find important and significant in their lives. It is impossible to avoid misinformation. But taking steps to get to the truth requires careful searching, and I may say, that books at the library and at university libraries and book stores are scrutinized for truth and accuracy before they hit the shelves. That is a good place to start to find information that is factual to be informed about things rather than just clicking your mouse or touching your screen with a stylus to be connected with a random website that may or may not be 100% legit. Fake sites are being taken down as fast as new ones take their place. For every legitimate writing site, cloned versions pop up taking the content of the original site and creating a fake site just so they can ride piggy back on them. It is a real rabbit hole for sure and we all need to find our way back to the surface and see the light before we get stuck in one of those dead ends.
7 people like this
8 responses
@Mike197602 (15487)
• United Kingdom
10 Jul 18
The simple way to avoid 'fake news' is to use multiple reliable sources. Have some understanding about national and international media outlets. If you read something in the known right wing press search the story among left wing press...check the facts as best you can, do extra research and come to your own conclusion. Fake news exists because people are too stupid or too lazy to do research.
3 people like this
• Dallas, Texas
10 Jul 18
That is a definitive yea.
2 people like this
@wolfgirl569 (94780)
• Marion, Ohio
11 Jul 18
For the most part I stick to the news on a couple of t.v. stations. These have no problem stating when they have made a mistake or letting you know upfront that their investigation is not complete yet so the story could change. I also have MSN for my home page and the stories on there seem to be fact checked as they will match multiple news sites for the story line. These online sites are mostly for likes and to cause trouble. Sadly they post what many people want to believe. Once people find something to back what they believe they stop searching for more facts.
2 people like this
• Dallas, Texas
11 Jul 18
I am glad you are enjoying your online news sources. I agree that MSN is a very good one. As for TV stations I watch NBC, CBS, ABC, PBS and FOX so I don't need cable TV. I get it free from the roof top antenna. :)
1 person likes this
@wolfgirl569 (94780)
• Marion, Ohio
11 Jul 18
@lookatdesktop That is all we have. I never watch FOX or PBS and seldom NBC but the other 2 I often do.
2 people like this
• Dallas, Texas
11 Jul 18
@wolfgirl569 I have a favorite station. PBS. It has always been my best and most favorite. But the shows I like best, no matter what channel are the shows like 20/20, 48 hours, Dateline, Frontline, What would you do? and ABC world news tonight and This Week with George Stephanopoulos, the local news on either CBS or ABC.
1 person likes this
• Calgary, Alberta
10 Jul 18
I know a certain country in turmoil of Propaganda control because of a paid celebrity who makes everyone believe the President is the best ever and if you are against him you are a bad person. I am not kidding. It is borderline 40 percent North Koreaish.
2 people like this
• Dallas, Texas
10 Jul 18
Do tell.
@rakski (112925)
• Philippines
11 Jul 18
I think I cannot handle that. Working with full of lies.
2 people like this
• Dallas, Texas
11 Jul 18
I know it is difficult to find truth among the many convoluted half truths online. Be well and remember, everyone experiences this type of internet anxiety from information overload so your are not alone.
2 people like this
@RasmaSandra (73198)
• Daytona Beach, Florida
11 Jul 18
Much too intense for me. The Internet already makes my head spin. I sure hope it doesn't become a losing battle.
2 people like this
• Dallas, Texas
11 Jul 18
It doesn't have to be. I just like to write stuff that gets people to thinking. Actually I am quite a laid back kind of guy. I tend to amplify things in writing. The internet if used wisely is the best avenue for finding out information quickly. But taking more time to pick and choose is a matter of course. :)
2 people like this
@josie_ (9763)
• Philippines
11 Jul 18
There will always be sycophants willing to spew falsehoods and propaganda either because it promotes their own beliefs but more often in order to gain a personal advantage or monetary gain. Whether we want to admit it or not, our personal bias contribute to our choice of news channels and how we rate their credibility. Regarding books published, history is replete with book burning. Books being banned because they paint an unflattering picture of whoever is in power or are deemed "dangerous" to authoritarian regimes. Worse we find written history being altered that brainwash the minds of children to fit the narrative of those in authority.
2 people like this
• Dallas, Texas
11 Jul 18
Yes, in certain instances. But you and I both know that there is no denying that books cost a lot to publish and people can upload a YouTube video at no cost. So the odds are better at getting false news from uploaded videos using a smartphone, than a solid book that has existed for decades. One book I am reminded of is 100 years of aviation by TIME-LIFE books. It is packed with accurate facts and information about aeronautical features of airplanes from the earliest days to the present for both commercial as well as military planes and jets. And The Encyclopedia Britannica.
2 people like this
@josie_ (9763)
• Philippines
11 Jul 18
@lookatdesktop _A few years ago the Chinese gov't protested the publication by ultra-nationalists of history textbooks to be use in secondary level education. The books tone down or deleted Japanese aggression and atrocities committed in their invasion of China during WWII. Perhaps US history textbooks also gloss over similar incidence against native Americans during the days of westward expansion of settlers? This are the kind of false dissemination that not only alter perception and create prejudice against minorities but also contribute to the disappearance of their cultural heritage. "Fake news" being spread in Trump's administration will influence people and impact their lives at most for 4 years (unless he gets re-elected) But a falsely written history leaves a longer legacy to future generations.
2 people like this
• Philippines
11 Jul 18
Nothing new in my country. But it was really the media networks who started it all. I hate it when people make fake news and gets money from it. They probably don't care if they don't sleep at night.
1 person likes this
• Dallas, Texas
12 Jul 18
They end up losing in the long run. I think.
@DaddyEvil (137145)
• United States
11 Jul 18
I never trust a single source of information, Anthony... What I do is search multiple sites for the information I'm wanting. (Sometimes, that leads me to a quandary when sites give different versions of the same information. When that happens, I look to see who actually did the original research. Checking where the information came from can help me make up my mind as to which site to trust for the information... ) There are many people doing different kinds of research on many different subjects and using many different methods to arrive at their facts. After doing in depth reviews of these people, you gradually weed out the ones who include misinformation without vetting it first.
1 person likes this
• Dallas, Texas
12 Jul 18
I am fond of TED TALKS and want to later subscribe to Curiosity Stream. Space.com is one of the ones I really like. And I usually use Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons and such.
1 person likes this
• Dallas, Texas
12 Jul 18
@DaddyEvil , You do what everyone else should in fact, do. Cross reference things!