How would you feel if myLot charged us to post a discussion?

@owlwings (43915)
Cambridge, England
July 21, 2018 5:26am CST
Suppose that myLot introduced a scheme so that every time we posted a discussion, 1 cent was deducted from our earnings? Of course, we'd still earn from the interactions received on our responses and comments and, depending on the number of responses and interactions in the discussion, we could probably easily make up that cent and more. I wonder whether it would reduce the number of discussions which have 'little or no substance' and lead to a slightly better quality overall or not. What are your thoughts on this?
42 people like this
43 responses
@boiboing (13153)
• Northampton, England
21 Jul 18
I would prefer to see a minimum word count to stop the ridiculous one-liner posts that take no effort from those who make them but seem to expect everybody else to build them into something worth reading.
6 people like this
@owlwings (43915)
• Cambridge, England
21 Jul 18
I'm not entirely convinced that a minimum word count would solve the problem (it was tried in Bubblews and didn't really work, as I recall) because anyone wanting to buck the system could easily pad out their text with rubbish.
2 people like this
@MALUSE (69413)
• Germany
21 Jul 18
@boiboing @owlwings I'm all for a minimum word count. If a post were padded with nonsense, it could be reported and deleted.
4 people like this
@akalinus (40440)
• United States
21 Jul 18
@MALUSE They had a minimum word count on ChatAbout. I saw a lot of posts that went something like this. xmuah xxxx yyy and zzzzzz etc. Really valuable stuff. Or lines of Xes with wordlike values.
2 people like this
@porwest (78761)
• United States
21 Jul 18
I don't think it would work. Beyond that, I also don't think quality works in a place like this either. On other sites if you tried to write a lengthy, quality post it would be ignored. And let's face it, there are only so many people who can actually write. A site limited to actual writers would fail miserably because many people can't do it well. I find that the longer the post, the less responses it gets, and generally speaking, lengthier posts have more quality. So long as this site still can earn from whatever discussions are posted, quality or not, it can work. But I do agree more quality would drive in more organic traffic which could improve site earnings, but I am not sure it would improve interactions.
6 people like this
@akalinus (40440)
• United States
21 Jul 18
I tried writing quality posts. It does not work here.
2 people like this
@akalinus (40440)
• United States
25 Jul 18
@porwest The big secret is to write for your audience. If they want to know what I ate for lunch, then I should regale them with a delightful tale about my peanut butter sandwich using multi-grain bread and natural peanut butter.
2 people like this
@porwest (78761)
• United States
24 Jul 18
@akalinus Indeed. No. It doesn't. This is not a site for that kind of post. Definitely.Write an indept philosophic and informative post it will fizzle. Write about what you ate for breakfast and you have a clear winner.
1 person likes this
@louievill (28851)
• Philippines
21 Jul 18
Think it would improve quality but would probably reduce members. We would all be careful cause it's like a right minus wrong exam lol!
4 people like this
@rakski (112925)
• Philippines
21 Jul 18
I agree to @louievill It moght improve the content of discussions but might lso decrease members here
2 people like this
@louievill (28851)
• Philippines
21 Jul 18
@Platespinner could you kindly explain to me what and how is feed clogging?
1 person likes this
@louievill (28851)
• Philippines
25 Jul 18
@Platespinner if these people were charged per post fot posting none quality posts then don't you think it would de-clog the site instead of clog it?
2 people like this
@JohnRoberts (109857)
• Los Angeles, California
21 Jul 18
There would be a mass exodus here including myself.
6 people like this
• Austin, Texas
9 Dec 18
I'd leave. That wasn't the deal when I signed up. Besides ... there are too many other sites that let me post for free. When I first started looking for ways to make money online these kinds of sites were hard for me to find. Every time I found one they shut down. Now there are enough out there for me to be choosy. If MyLot starts charging, as much as I like it here, I'll choose to go elsewhere.
2 people like this
@Jessabuma (31700)
• Baguio, Philippines
21 Jul 18
That would be great idea, especially I rarely post my own discussion
4 people like this
@May2k8 (18078)
• Indonesia
22 Jul 18
@RvSinh she mean she still posting and rarely create her own discussion. So she still earn.
2 people like this
@Jessabuma (31700)
• Baguio, Philippines
22 Jul 18
@RvSinh I am making $15 or more a month.
1 person likes this
@RvSinh (234)
22 Jul 18
As you said you rarely post here, than how much money have you made?
2 people like this
21 Jul 18
I think that if myLot does that, it will be a little bit selfish on their part because we don't really earn a lot here, so to take out a cent from each discussion started, well you do the Math. But if you are talking about mindless discussions started, there can also be mindless replies, so take a cent out too?
4 people like this
21 Jul 18
@Platespinner I know, and that may be a thing of the past, because now I can see the category of "New User Discussions", which I believe wasn't this organized before. And if those discussions do not make it to Top Rated or Interesting Discussions, the clogs are less rampant, if you know what I mean.
2 people like this
@BarBaraPrz (45484)
• St. Catharines, Ontario
21 Jul 18
Pooh! You're no fun...
2 people like this
@owlwings (43915)
• Cambridge, England
21 Jul 18
Perhaps I have a wicked sense of humour!
2 people like this
@May2k8 (18078)
• Indonesia
21 Jul 18
myLot should test it, if good in the future then the scheme can continue.
2 people like this
@owlwings (43915)
• Cambridge, England
21 Jul 18
I have seen a few sites where it cost a few 'points' to post a question or a discussion (they were sites which paid on a points system rather than directly in cash). I believe that it's certainly worth testing, if its feasible to do so.
1 person likes this
@akalinus (40440)
• United States
21 Jul 18
@owlwings Point or star systems are ripe for abuse by trolls and people with a score to settle.
2 people like this
@allknowing (130066)
• India
21 Jul 18
I do not think it has anything to do with quality discussions but the relationship between users that they pick discussions to respond to irrespective of how lackluster the discussions are.
3 people like this
@LadyDuck (458006)
• Switzerland
21 Jul 18
I am ready to subscribe this option, this seems the best way to reduce the number of meaningless discussions.
2 people like this
@LadyDuck (458006)
• Switzerland
22 Jul 18
@boiboing This is sad, but it's true, it's hard to find something interesting to read, but I skip anyway those meaningless discussions.
1 person likes this
@boiboing (13153)
• Northampton, England
22 Jul 18
@LadyDuck I read a lot of posts that I don't like and don't comment on. I can't bring myself to reward them. Even though I cut off my nose to spite my face because those people won't come and read me.
2 people like this
@boiboing (13153)
• Northampton, England
21 Jul 18
The problem is that if you look at the list of newest discussions and took out all the meaningless fluff, there's not a lot left to work with.
2 people like this
@antonbunot (11091)
• Calgary, Alberta
24 Nov 18
I compare that scheme to the current American politics. It is racist to do that to improve the quality of discussions. You know I categorize myloters in 3 types. First, those who have an inborn talent to write excellent discussions. Second, those who learned by trial-n-error to write discussions that make sense. And last and also the least, those like me who love to write discussions but the art of writing does not love them. LOL
2 people like this
@owlwings (43915)
• Cambridge, England
24 Nov 18
I can'r quite see how you associate the idea with American politics and I certainly don't understand how you can think it 'racist' in any way!
1 person likes this
@owlwings (43915)
• Cambridge, England
25 Nov 18
@antonbunot I do like your categories, though I don't think you belong in the last one!
1 person likes this
@antonbunot (11091)
• Calgary, Alberta
24 Nov 18
@owlwings then don’t worry about it. Just ignore my comment laced with humor.
@Shiva49 (26200)
• Singapore
21 Jul 18
I agree that can lead to less frivolous discussions. Then one would be more careful about getting "net gain" from each post - siva
3 people like this
@NJChicaa (115984)
• United States
21 Jul 18
That would seriously piss me off.
4 people like this
21 Jul 18
I am not sure about it. Because some topics that may be nonsense to some can mean so much to some. Like for an example I can post something like, Hello everyone another day for me and I am excited to get out of my bed then I will go downstairs to eat cereals and blah blah. It may be nothing for some and they won't waste their time reading everything that was posted. But you may not know that the person who posted that some called nonsense post, means a lot cause the person has stage 4 cancer and everyday is a miracle for him to be alive.
3 people like this
@owlwings (43915)
• Cambridge, England
21 Jul 18
They should include that information, then.. I would contend that the example you quoted has no merit whatsoever as a discussion topic. It is simply a statement of facts without anything to support any kind of discussion.
1 person likes this
@Jlyn10 (11966)
• Malaysia
21 Jul 18
That's fine by me cause I very seldom post discussions.
2 people like this
• Bournemouth, England
21 Jul 18
I believe the number of discussions posted per day is around 350 so it would hardly be a big money-spinner for the site. It would certainly reduce the discussions with little merit but then so would a Bubblews-type daily limit.
2 people like this
@Namelesss (3368)
• United States
22 Jul 18
What I would really like to see is One Member = One Post per day. I think the days of post post post are well behind us and websites actually earn more for less if the content isn't mostly rubbish.
2 people like this
@Meramar (2695)
22 Jul 18
Of course, it would be more interesting if all discussions would be written with full substance, more quality, more interactions, and so on. But, based on different reasons, it's difficult to reach. It doesnt't matter if mylot would charge one cent for each new discussion, or if we would have to write a minimum of words or lines. We have to remember that many users (including myself) are not native English speaker. So, for some of us, it may mean some problems to write or express well in English. Of course, some not English natives do a very good job. But for others, it's more difficult. If we want to improve the quality of the content, it would be necessary to combine several rules like: 1) Charging 1 cent for new discussion; 2) Minimum words; 3) An offer based on different themes to choose inbetween when start writing; those would help to give an idea what to write about; 4) A minimum level of English (including a help guidlines / courses or classes for those who would like to improve their English or, in general, writing skills). 5) Including a correction system.......
2 people like this
@Kandae11 (53679)
21 Jul 18
I think it is a good idea. One cent isn't much - but then who am I to say? I post one discussion every day or every other day. This is because of the very poor internet service I have been receiving over the past year.
2 people like this
@dya80dya (33510)
21 Jul 18
If we don't have discussions how can we respond and comment?
2 people like this
@owlwings (43915)
• Cambridge, England
21 Jul 18
It wouldn't stop people from posting discussions. Hopefully, it might make some people think twice before posting some of the rather mindless 'discussions'.
1 person likes this