who is better

Both are good in their on way.... But, for me its Ganguly who is better. He is capable of managing the critics and BCCI officials better... If, u hav a person who could do that the team confidence grows up and the team perform well as a unit. Further, how can we forget... this team was built up by Ganguly and he had taken the remains of the Indian team and brought it such an extend and Dravid is just follwing those. When it comes to a person as a whole its always Dravid

Dravid was enforced the Captaincy just because that time the management did not want to see Ganguly. Ganguly was a great captain, a great leader and above all a person who can inspire. When Sreesanth danced on pitch after hittin Neil a six, it was praised all over because of the agressive attitude, when Ganguly did the same in Lords, he had to answer a lot of things. Unless we are agressive we cannot win. Dravid is not agressive and certainly not a good captain. He is no doubt a great batsman.

Ganguly is indded way better than Dravid in odi batting and captaincy in both forms of the game. Dada is also better in terms of mental strength. Dravid is only better as a test batsmen.

dravid

dravid

both of them r equally good i like both of dem 2 play 4 india

Certainly, ganguly is better as he has better one day records and better captaincy records and dravid though is a better test batsman but he falls behind ganguly in most areas. Even dravid's captaincy success can be attributed to ganguly as ganguly was the one who changed the face of indian cricket much like steve waugh did for australia and ricky ponting took over.. So i'd say ganguly is better than dravid.

i think Ganguly is better

Sourav is best in post now rahul dravi is best.I think one match we should seek another person to lead indian team, in test amtch we should use dravid as captain.