do you like artist who keeps on reviving songs..?

songs and same revival, same face of versions - a twin duplicate original is better
Philippines
January 14, 2007 11:22am CST
from first album to another almost all songs are revived and adulterated.. that you can say the original sounds better and nothing beats the original.. but some songs are so nicely revived and i appreciate how much artist uniquely made a wonderful version.. but some artist just makes album of much revivals and none of their own original... what do you think of it?
2 responses
15 Jan 07
no i dont think they should revive songs, songs should only be revived if it is in honour of the artist and the artist has made arrangements for this to be done, otherwise people are not really good singers, they are just using someone elses song to promote themselves, because they know its going to sell
• Philippines
15 Jan 07
i agree... thanks for this response.
@raijin (10373)
• Philippines
15 Jan 07
I hate them, the fact that their remake was a disaster. Especially those who did a tribute to "Apo Hiking Society" and revived some of their songs, it's a low quality. Some bands just seek for popularity and not for compettion, vying for the top position and not for quality-based compositions. They're like a bunch of wierdos, with only roars and whoa's in their songs. I'm a rocker myself, but it doesn't mean that rock music cannot create great songs. But I just don't feel any local band that can surpass the 90's bands like the E-heads and Wolfgang have been through!;)