Photography

Yes photography still earn....Newspapers, magazines and stuff still need photgraphers. Some photographers like Ansel Adams make a ton of money from their photos because they are simply gorgeous.

thay are still verry good job to have you cah work in photo shop or open your one is a shoping center pople still have to have thire wedding picher taken by some buddy os thier is still lott of work for them to do

ya if u got the pictures they will be rare in some years......hard to find so take as many pictures of toursim, people, site seeing roads buildsing etc.............just to remind you 9/11 was captured by somebody with digicam.

I sure they do. It's just better equiptments.

Though video cameras have really invaded our houses and everything, but the feel that you get when you view a good photograph, is always different, its makes yu think about the situation. it does not completely reveal the situaton but instead asks you to think about it.-thats the magic of a photograph and it will never lessen.

there is lots of difference between a man with a cam and photographer

Actually, I think so. Here are two website were you can earn money for your photos. I don't know anything about them. Hope they are good ones. www.cashforphotos.braveshot.com www.43things.com/things/view/784518

another pix

No dear,photography still can give you handsome money...i'm a photojournalist by profession n working for a reputed publication here in india...i sell my picture in good money...digital has enhance the capability of a photographers insight....you can't be a good photo artist unless you see the things differently,ok.I'm posting 2 of my pix for your discussion,hopu u all love it,bye.

before discusing this subject i wish u a happy " ead and diwali "....

ya i think photography stilll earns..

i like it.photography is a classic and skilly feature

i jus love it....

I hope it still earns becuase I was thinking of taking up photography.

Yes, am sure they still can make god income cause I don't think the traditional photographers can be replace with thier skills and expeiences.

I take pictures and the ones I really like I print out to keep in books or a couple I have enlarged to frame. There are somethings computers can't replace..one of them is art.

Photography in terms of the film processing plants? Most of them have cut back and developed a digital approach such as Kodack who offer a service of dealing with prints I believe. As for conventional photography, no, why should that stop?

I always try to have my camera with me and document where I go and what I do. It's great to look back on memories years after the events have happened. I just got married in June and all my family had their cameras with them and I had a professional photographer too... i think we ended up with over 3000 photos of our special day. It means so much to me to have all these great memories!

yes, it still does. though we already have video cams, we also need photography to document alot of things. we need it for scrap booking, office documentation (for hard copy), reports, etc.

From my friends who has this kind of business, they say they don't earn that much as before. Others even shifted to other businesses.