Is the restriction on the endorsements necessary?

Endorsements!
India
April 9, 2007 3:05am CST
BCCI has decided to now allow the players to endorse a maximum of 3 products. Was it very necessary? People are blaming the players for endorsing products and coming in ads, "to devote more time to cricket practice than advertising"..as if they go to act for the ad. EACH time it is coming on TV!!! What do u think - was restrictions on the endorsements necessary? (i dont think dat it has anything to do with how they play on the field). whats ur view?
1 person likes this
2 responses
• India
9 Apr 07
Putting restrictions on endorsement of products by [players to 3 was not necessary. It only conveys an impression that BCCI thinks that entire blame for WC debacle lies with players. While searching for reasons of this debacle BCCI first xcluded itself from any responsibility, then gave a clean chit to coach and then cleared the captain by retaining him as captain. BCCI only tried to find scapegoats and real goats have escaped.
1 person likes this
@20031969 (934)
• India
9 Apr 07
i am agree with BCCI decision against indian players after debacle in world cup 2007. it is high time this steps should be taken against them then they can pay their attention too much towards cricket. thanks.