Is there a need for more expansion teams in the NBA?
By abs_gwapi2
@abs_gwapi2 (107)
Philippines
April 11, 2007 8:03am CST
If 30 teams are not enough for you, then how many more teams should the NBA have? Give me cool team names guys!
4 responses
@Makoy1983 (1084)
• Philippines
12 Apr 07
30 teams is enough. if they expand, they might as well add more games to the 82 regular season games.
@abs_gwapi2 (107)
• Philippines
12 Apr 07
Why not??!! That would mean that the NBA would air live the whole year!! We don't have to wait for the next season to come...
@Makoy1983 (1084)
• Philippines
12 Apr 07
in our part that would be great, but it might not do good to the teams. the offseason is a great time for teams to scout players, rookies and key acquisitions and an ample time for teams to create chemistry
@romel_ece (1290)
• Philippines
13 Apr 07
For me, I think 30 teams is enough already for the NBA.It's quite a long regular season already and we all excited and thrilled come playoffs time.
@NBABlogger (249)
• Philippines
12 Apr 07
It's better to expand the regular season of the NBA to 86 games a team. That would mean one team will face an intra-conference team four times, while playing inter-con teams twice per team.
If you still don't get it, check this math:
14 (teams playing in the same conference)
x 4 (number of games each against intra-con teams)
=56
15 (teams from the other conference)
x 2 (number of games each against inter-con teams)
=30
56+30=86
