Bram Stokers 'Dracula'  | | For those of you, who have read my first instalment in this series of literature postings, you shall be familiar with the association between the Templars and Gothic architecture; so it seemed only right that I should now give time to the English Gothic novel. Whilst I use the term English, it should be remembered that Bram Stoker was born in Dublin. He did, however, move to London and work at the Lyceum Theatre long before beginning his serious fiction writing career. It should also be remarked upon that the Victorians were very interested (even intrigued) by death, and the lengthening of ones lifespan. Books such as 'The Mummy' and 'Frankenstein' had already cashed in on this interest in the afterlife, and had particularly Egyptian and scientific influences. Both Egyptology and Science were traditionally regarded as going against God, and as evil. Certain Christian sects still do not allow doctors to treat them nowadays. By 1897, English society was perfectly ready to embrace another tale of immortality, and the battle between traditional (Catholic) good and (Templar/Protestant) evil. Chuck in a good dose of life-beyond-death, a taste of sensuous eroticism, a historical, nostalgic sense of drama and blood-letting, and every Victorian lady would be gripped! Bram Stoker gave them all this and much more, and we can continue to enjoy the same today. Of course, Bram did not invent the Vampire; instead, he took all that the Occult, Paganism and the Catholic Church had ascribed to Vampirism, and bundled it into a single European gentleman: the suave, wealthy, well-bred, and charming Count Dracula - everything a Victorian lady of standing would desire in a prospective husband. We should examine some of the known details and documentation on Vampires, before examining Dracula himself (as the embodiment of many of these traits), and where Bram may have encountered them. The reader may well be surprised by the amount of writing on the subject in the 250 years PRIOR to the famous novel. The earliest known writings on Vampires is found in the Torah of Judaism, in ancient China, and in writings of the Greeks. I shall commence with the Torah, as this particular text is still the basis of an incredibly large modern day religion. Many people today will be unaware that Adam had a wife before Eve, but that this particular lady refused to be subservient to her husband, so God excommunicated her, and cast her out. Lilith, as she was called, was clearly the first ever feminist. She felt that being beneath Adam during the act of sex was unbecoming as she was his equal. She was cursed by God, and is portrayed as the killer of young children, and drinker of their blood. There has been a lot recently written, and shown in films like 'Eyes Wide Shut' & 'Da Vinci Code', about sex within religion, so it would seem insulting to the reader to mention this aspect of gnosticism and Templar life regarding feminine equality and the sexual act (needless to say that the act prefered by Adam is still known to this day as 'Missionary Position'!). The Incubus/Succubus is also known as a creature that sucks ones lifeforce from a person during the sexual act, and I'm sure many ladies may feel that their partner is hardly alive after fulfilling the act, if not actually dead! The removal of the male seed, and the metaphor of the seed as a form of life, or lifegiving, ia also very clear. It is opportune to mention that Bram is really an abbreviation of the authors first name, Abraham. The ancient Greek writers had told stories about a variety of living-dead types, who kept themselves alive by imbibing the lifeforce of the living through different techniques, including the drinking of blood. These beasts lived within the realms of the Underworld, but could on occassion, pass to Earth. These creatures were known as Vrykolakas. I mention these creatures, as, in 1645, a famous study of these creatures and the writings about them was published by Leo Allatius, and Bram may well have been familiar with this text. Now, briefly, to the East, and the love of Oriental writers for the 'Kiang Shi', who took on the life force through blood consumption from the living, to continue their existence. In Japan, this Chinese fascination has continued today, with many Vampires appearing in Manga magazines, and anime movies. Whilst it is unlikely that Mr Stoker would have encountered the 'Kiang Shi' in his research, I have included this example to show that this kind of story has been about us forever, and across all societies. As a final footnote on these ancient texts, it should be noted that a Vampire named Algul appears in the 'Tales of the Arabian Nights'. As this hub is regarding the Templars and their fellow gnostics, it is I feel, time to allow the Roman Catholic Church to enter the affray. The first RC reference to Vampires can safely be ascribed to Pope Innocent III, who referred to such evil characters in 1215, although the church's official stance on Vampires was not properly communicated until 1489, when these beasts appear among the list of devils and demons which only the church has the ability and authority to combat, in the Malleus Maleficarum. These creatures seem to harken back to the Apocryphal tales of Lilith, who sought refuge from Adam among the devils around the Red Sea. Their inclusion has roots within Catholic doctrine from before this time. One of the church's attributes of the Vampire, is that its body does not decay after death. Ironically, this is also a step in the proof of Sainthood! For fans of the film Nosferatu, where Fritz Lang has deftly intertwined the association of the Black Death with Vampirism, and an old tale from Bremen (to reset the story in post-World War I Germany); the change from Whitby to Bremen is not a chance one. Apparently, in 10th Century Bremen, the Archbishop, St Libentius, excommunicated several sailors. Many years later, the grave of one of these sailors was disturbed, and the body found not to have decayed. This so disturbed the locals, that the latest Archbishop had to pardon the sailors, so their souls could leave their bodies, and the corpses decay naturally. This concept of excommunication meaning that the soul could not leave the body, but instead to be trapped, again reinforces the idea that only the church held the power to combat Vampires. The Roman Catholic church stayed steadfast in its teachings on Vampires until the middle of the 18th century. That it had changed its stance at this time, still required many further years before being absorbed by the average Catholic person living after that period. It was Dom Augustine Calmet, in 1746, who first started the ball rolling against the church on the existence of Vampires, and the long-term effect was so slow in coming, that Voltaire was astonished to attend a discussion on the existence, or not, of Vampires at the Sorbonne!I suggest that I have now spent sufficient time painting a historical context for the novel, though have left one particular person out of the picture; for it is with he that many people falsely relate the eponymous character. I take you on a journey, across Europe and time, back to 1431, and the birth of a young boy in Romania: Vlad the Impaler, governor of Transylvannia under Emperor Sigismund, and member of the Teutonic 'Order of the Dragon', regarded by the Wallachians as 'the Evil One'. The term Dracul has been given 2 strong meanings, though which you choose to believe, I shall leave to the reader. It could refer to his being within the aforementioned order, as Dracul is the Romanian word for Dragon, or, it could be the Wallachian word for Evil. Both apply to Vlad, though alas, he is not the inspiration for the novel's Count. The pertinence of Romanians has more to do with the term Romany, and the fact that Romanian could also be used to describe the gypsies whose persecution by the church, and protection by the Templars, has already been addressed in the first hub. Within the novel, it is of interest to note that these gypsies (known as the Szgany) are the keepers and protectors of Dracula. A hint that Bram Stoker regards these people as noble, contrary to the church's stance, is contained in the final chapter where Van Helsing remarks that the leader of the gypsies was 'a splendid looking fellow, who sat his horse like a centaur', bestowing respect, and a mythical accent upon the man. It is, in fact, from the very mouth of the church's hero, Van Helsing, that we glean the Templar tendencies of Bram Stoker. Having now entered the realms of the novel itself, I should examine that most Christian of the characters, and so, ladies and gentlemen, I introduce Abraham Van Helsing. I have already mentioned that Bram's first name was actually Abraham, and all the history and aplomb that the Jewish and Christian faiths have bestowed upon that name, Bram donated to his hero (if you, in fact regard the vampire slayer as the hero, not the adversory). There could hardly be a name that holds so much within it, as Abraham. A name as old as time, a devoted man, and father of a nation. As for the surname "Van Helsing," a number of possibilities have been suggested. It may derive from Dr Hesselius, the fictional narrator of Sheridan Le Fanu's famous Vampire tale "Carmilla" (1872). Given Stoker's familiarity with Shakespearean plays as manager of the Lyceum Theatre, the origin is possibly "Elsinore" - the Danish town in which Hamlets' castle is located. This is a bit of a stretch, but possibly reflects the similarities between Van Helsing and Hamlet. A third consideration is Van Helmont, an ancient alchemist mentioned briefly in T J Pettigrew's On Superstitions Connected with the History and Nature of Medicine and Surgery (1844), one of Stokers known source-texts for Dracula. The last of these texts may raise a few eye-brows, although Bram Stoker's name appears several times within lists of members of the 'Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn',
|
 Nosferatu |
|
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Adrenochrome (736) | 3 years ago | By heck, those scallies have abridged me! I feel hurt. Read on, my wise friend;The last of these texts may raise a few eye-brows, although Bram Stoker's name appears several times within lists of members of the 'Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn', a possible branch of the Masons, or rival society, established in 1888. Several of the other chracters names may hold some significance, especially in historic and literary contexts. The Name 'Harker' refers to a recalling, as a hark is a remembrance, and can also be used to imply foolishness, as in 'Hark you'. Is the storyteller not just reminiscing, but also a fool of the church? Is Quincey Morris named in honour of the famous opium-eater Thomas De Quincey, who fell out with Samuel Taylor Coleridge over Quincey's promotion of opium use. Is Quincey Morris living under a fog of drugs that stop him seeing the truth? The other male characters fall back on sound English names, and represent the establishment beautifully: Carfax, Lord Godalming and Dr Seward. There is also a wonderful yin and yang about our two heroines Mina and Lucy, who seem to almost be photographic negatives of easch other. 'Wilhelmina' has a germanic austerity, and is a hard-working middle-class, school-mistress, who is still trying to better herself by studying shorthand. Lucy is the fun-loving, vivacious, upper-class English Rose. Yet, they are the closest of friends. Women are very important to the story, and these examples of prudent England, of purity and faith are very much at odds with Dracula's female concubines, with sexuality and permissiveness again rearing its head. Even Van Helsing sounds as though he has his head turned by these ladies who desire the throbbing pulse of a mans throat, when he describes them to us, 'I knew the swaying round forms, the bright hard eyes, the white teeth, the ruddy colour, the voluptuous lips.' Whatever an encounter with the Count may do to a woman, it certainly removes the church's veil from their sexuality, which one might interpret as giving them a new-found freedom to express themselves fully. Whilst the story is a clear-cut a battle between good and evil, it is within the subplot that the important matters arise. Which side is in fact the good, and which the evil? Is it Christian and tolerant to attempt to ethnically cleanse a whole people? Can people's souls be won by the sword, not through the heart? Van Helsing is certainly an honourable man, whose actions are governed by a high morality. The same applies to Dracula. So too, was Shakespeare's Hamlet, to whom I have already alluded. The Bards play is also about a battle, between the old and the new, and the consequences of this battle are the loss of Hamlets sanity. Throughout 'Dracula', Van Helsing appears to be doubting his own sanity more and more, as the piece progresses. Both Hamlet and Van Helsing become aware of their loss of sanity, and are very much the epitomies of the sad and tragic heroes because of this awareness and the damage it has wreaked upon once brilliant men. Modern morality is very clear on the act of pogrom, with such infamous world leaders as Stalin and Hitler condemned for all time for this offense. When Bram Stoker wrote his book, the matter was not so defined. The Roman Catholic Popes had already eradicated many races and creeds during the previous 750 years, and the British Empire itself, had behaved in a manner very similar, during its dealings with natives of the Empire; most notably against the Zulus. William Wilberforce and his colleagues had managed to abolish slavery, the Empire was going through a stage of consolidation, and in some member states, even attempting to build bridges with the locals. Peoples who had always been regarded as less than human, were now considered citizens, and Stoker may well have reflected this change; Victorians may have seen their own actions mirrored in Van Helsings attempts to destroy any and all Vampires. Ethnic cleansing was being re-evaluated as barbaric, and certainly, the Empire was leaning towards a Political attitude of 'more carrot, less stick'. Pertinently, today this same argument is being voiced regarding 'how is the best way to defeat terrorism?'. One of the beautiful aspects about the novel is its ending. There was no glory in, nor celebration of the death of Dracula. Instead, Stoker leaves us with hope for the future, with the birth of Mina's son, dubbed Quincey by the characters, in honour of their fallen ally. There is also a gnostic concept of women, finally recognised by Van Helsing, seeing the strength of Mina, the power of female sexuality, and the man's need to love this. He speaks of the future 'This boy will some day know what a brave and gallant woman his mother is. Already he knows her sweetness and loving care. Later on, he will understand how some men loved her, that they did dare much for her sake'. Gnostics would say the same of the Magdalene, and of the church's hiding of her true aspect and role. The original final chapter of the book was rewritten, as the publishers felt that the ending would have provoked the church to bring blasphemy charges against themselves and the author, so it was toned down into the version we know and love today. In the original, having fatally wounded Dracula, Van Helsing allows him to crawl into his own hallway, where he is cradled in Mina's arms. He undergoes the transubstantiation back to human form, before passing away, bathed in a holy light from above, as God welcomes him into heaven. Most tellingly, Van Helsing declares with a clarity of meaning, his final loss of faith (and possibly his mind) by shouting to his companions to let Dracula be, and stating 'We have all become Gods madmen'. I hope that you have enjoyed this dip into the waters of gothic horror, but try to remember that Vampires don't exist. So sleep safe, and don't have nightmares. Then again, there is the Chupacabra...
| |
|
|
angelicEmu (629) | 3 years ago | I certainly have, Adrenochrome! Thank-you:-)
| |
|
| | Obama Gives $31 Billion for Student Aid Submit Your Profile and Speak With A College Admissions Officer Today. www.ClassesUSA.com | add comment |
|
| | 2. Darkwing (7519) | 3 years ago | Thank you, Adren my friend. I find that all very interesting, although I'm already aware of the basics. I've checked out the legend of Lilith and wonder if you've read the Historian, by Elizabeth Kostova, as regards Vlad the Impaler and Dracula? I really enjoyed this book, and think you would too if you haven't already.
Brightest Blessings for a great day!
| |
| |
|
|
Adrenochrome (736) | 3 years ago | I haven't come across the Elizabeth Kostova book, so shall keep an eye out for it. It sounds interesting. I'm glad to hear that you're familiar with the subject. Did you get a sense of deja vu? It was strange, but whilst writing it, it flowed as though the words were familiar to me, and it took hardly effort to knock the whole posting out! I am a bad person, and should be flogged.
| |
|
|
Darkwing (7519) | 3 years ago | I've seen The Historian, on EBay, sometimes, for 99p, lol.
It's about a historian, and written by his daughter, supposedly. The father works with another historian and both, mysteriously, come across books in their libraries, with a cut out dragon symbol in the centre and the word drakulya. From there, the mystery unfolds and becomes very interesting. I would recommend a read. Elizabeth Kostova has cleverly recaptured and updated the Dracula story which Bram Stoker originally penned.
Enough already!!!:) Are vampyres really a legend? Hmmmmmmmm. Brightest Blessings, my friend.
| |
|
| | Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance ($90,000 Refinance under $489/mo) See Rates - No Credit Check Needed. www.LowerMyBills.com | add comment |
|
| | | | Online Degrees Get Your AA, BA, Masters or PhD at a Top Online School. Start Now. Education.Nextag.com/Online-Degrees
| | |
| | | |
| Online Degrees Get Your AA, BA, Masters or PhD at a Top Online School. Start Now. Education.Nextag.com/Online-Degrees | |
|