is it just me

its probably true. i don't pay attention to most of those things. but most likely he just deepened his voice to sound more 'evil' so to say then he would when playing clark.

i think what tom weiling trying to do on differentiating clark and bizarro is that. Although they are same on the outside, and both of them, or bizarro knows a lot about clark. However, they are completely different people. So i think this is the way how tom act bizarro by deeper his voice while clark as normal voice.

In a way, it is much more easier for us to know who is who. However, sometimes i will get confuse on who is clark and who is bizarro. That is also why Lana was being fooled by it. If i didn find out about this post, i may never differentiate them through their voice. Come to say that, i think you are right.

I recalled that when clark and bizarro meet each other, their voices are different. So cool! Tom weiling really rocks!
Haha

Every so often it would sound deeper. What a great episode.

Yeah I think its suppose to be darker to make him more bizzar. But if they really wanted to make him opposite of clark they should of made him a black version of clark now that would be pretty cool if you ask me. but I liked bizzaro and loved how he came back in the latter episodes and that was a big shock since I didnt think he would come back and would vanish like zod did.

i didn't notice that. but what i noticed was the episode stated that bizarro copied clark's dna right? if he only copied his dna, then why did he copy what clark was wearing? does this mean that clark's blue shirt & red jacket are parts of his dna? and if you guys can remember, the presentation of bizarro in the comics and in the animated series is not the same as superman. his appearance is a bit odd & he has the mind of a child.