Missouri State Police  

well thatis a good thing. I was surprised that they actually put it in writing, I would think that would just open them up to all sorts of lawsuits.
I did realize that I was a little late with this topic, thanks for the update!!
There is just too much going to to keep up, yes??

You are aware that militia's are prefectly legal and constitutionaly mandated are you not? and that not ONE single death has ever been atributed to these "terrorists". I see you have bought in to the propaganda. do yourself a favor, go look at the Missouri Militia's website and then come back and tell me how terroristic these guys are. They work with the police and national guard, assist in search and rescue, missing children, food and blood drives, disaster relief assistence3 and a host of other dituies in addition to being a sanctioned state defense fore under the direct command of the governor.
Ron Paul is a long time sitting congresman For a goverment agency to come out and lable his supporters as terrorsists is obsurd.
And last I knew, it was no crime to support someone who isn't a democrat or republican, we are allowed to have more than 2 parties and support who ever we choose.
Now, the sons of liberty, I'm most interested in hearing your issues with them, so please elaborate? Do you believe them to be "terrorists"?

You see what you want to see like most people. I merely asked a few questions of someone with whom I have regular exchanges on this site to gain a better perspective of her views.

Obviously you are the one who has not only bought into propaganda but is perpetuating it.

No, I was asking some questions and directing to someone, someone who seemed to me to have an already existing bias based on having been given information that was inacurate. It was a presumption in restrospect I probably should not have made, but if was was indeed correct, I am interested in hearing your thoughts, I meant nothing hostile.

You made a definitaive statement about someone you do not know from the very start of your post. That is seeing what you want to see, not asking questions.

P. S. I have no thoughts, only questions with regards to this subject.

I disagre, I was asking a seriese of questions including the first sentence, again, yes, I made an assumption, (apologies) but again, meant it with better intent. I also tried to illustrate what I myself felt was wrong with the way the document singled out and in other areas generalized things. Have you by any chance seen the document? again, just asking, not trying to be snide.

I have not seen anything other than this discussion from a myLot "friend" that I became aware of via email notification. In the interest of participation and support and reciprocity I posted a response asking for details and information from a person who posts a lot of politically themed discussions.