do you always take picture on people?

Yes, it is fun for remembrance in our lives.

i like to take pictures of scenery or objects. sometimes it'd good to include people in such pictures but not in a posed stance.

if i'm including people in a scenic shot i like them to look natural, to be walking, talking to each other or maybe even sitting down but not staring directly at the camera and smiling.

i think landscapes look far better without people but if people want to be included i think posing and smiling completely ruins the picture.

In many cases the person makes th photo mor3 inerestig

i do take pictures with people but it depends on the subject. some times i like to take pictures of nature and land forms or water forms.

How can there be a rule about this? Sometimes it isn't possible to get a "virgin" landscape; sometimes only a human figure can give scale to the shot and at other times they detract from the scene. Often they ARE the picture.

I really do not mind taking pictures with or without people on it. Its the picture that comes out of it that I just mind. I like everything and anything to be taken by my cam.:)

When I bought my first camera my father told me to always include people in the pictures, and he told me that pictures without people were boring. In the beginning I followed his advice, but now I sometimes take pictures without people. I often do both, I take some pictures with people and some pictures without people, but it depends what kind of pictures it is. On holdiday pictures I usually include people, but when I take pictures of abandoned buidings (one of my hobbies) I don't include people and I think that people would "ruin" the pictures, because I like to focus on the builings.

i'm fond of pictures.all kinds of them. i even include people if necessary.most of the time, i get pictures from important events of friends and families.and have them transferred to my pc so that others can view them in my friendster or facebook.