How far can an Abstract artist go with his work of art?

Did you ever notice in some of the art work such as Pablo Picasso, Georges Braque, and Wassily Kandinsky can be way off making you question what is it? All Abstract artwork does make you question what the artist was thinking at the time and what the heck is it?

Even the title of the art work can really confuse your eyes on what is depicted in thier work of art. Title can tell you what you will see on the picture, than other time you will not see what the title says. My question is how far can you go to creating an abstract art work that can make you uncertain to what you see?

Even some leave it as "untitle", like Pollock work of art that didn't show a thing or depict in a way that you could figure it out. When you look at it,it like all he did was spill the ink on paper, and TA DUM. It Done!

So even now the artists portray work that make you mind boggle up with question. Are willing to figure the artist out, put a title on those untitle work, or are you willing to create your own that will really throw off the people eyes making it two time confusing to look at it?

How far can artists go to confusing you what you see in Abstract art work?