Rush Limbaugh - NFL Owner?

@anniepa (27955)
United States
October 13, 2009 2:02pm CST
You've probably heard that right-wing talk show host Rush Limbaugh has put in a bid to purchase the St Louis Rams NFL team. At this point he and St. Louis Blues owner Dave Checketts, who is in on the bid with Limbaugh, "aren't thought to be the frontrunners". I wouldn't be surprised if he got it just the same because we all know that "money talks" and Rush likes to boast of his power. However, there are some football players who have vowed not to play for any team Limbaugh is associated with. http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/2009/10/09/2009-10-09_black_nfl_players_crush_prospect_of_playing_for_a_rush_limbaughowned_st_louis_ra.html I have a feeling the Rams may also lose a fair number of fans and possibly ticket and merchandise sales. What do you think? If you're a Rams fan will you continue to root for them if Rush Limbaugh becomes the owner? Will it cause you to root AGAINST them? If you were a player, how would you feel about playing for someone many believe is a racist? Annie
3 people like this
13 responses
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
13 Oct 09
As some have already mentioned, the bottom line is money, but the real money in any football franchise is generated by the talent...the players, most especially the good ones who the fans come to see play and who many other teams would love to have. I've heard the rumblings and all it will take is for one or two of the most critical players to threaten to go "free agent" and the deal will die. Walking away from the Rams does not translate to unemployment and every player has an agent who will be shopping him out long before he makes the announcement that he's going to be available. I may not know who the owners are, you may not know who the owners are but the players know who they work for and it's going to depend on how well the organization can downplay Rush's past racial comments. If I was a Ram's fan I wouldn't want anyone at the top who could cost the team even one good player...either now or in the future.
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
14 Oct 09
Well Free agents come and go. Every team is used to seeing talented players leave. It's just part of the business. I've seen big players leave the Bills because they hated the coach (back when Wade Phillips was coach) and that didn't get him fired. Coaches are MUCH closer to the players than the owner so I think that him being part owner of a team really won't matter that much to the players or the franchise.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
14 Oct 09
When star players go Free Agent, they don't hang in the wind for long...that's a fact. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how it plays out. As long as it's not the Redskins or the Dolphins, I don't really care all that much.
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Oct 09
Thankfully or unfortunately, depending on how you look at it, the Rams don't have a star player. They're one of the very few teams in the league with mediocre--in comparison with 'star power'--talent from QB to special teams. I don't know if this has anything to do with Rush. I just enjoy pointing out how much the Rams suck lol
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
13 Oct 09
So he wants to invest in a lifelong dream, and his love for the game of football, so what? I haven't seen Limbaugh do anything as bad as what Michael Vick did, and many defended his return to the NFL. If Rush and his partners make the best offer, then let the chips fall where they may.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
13 Oct 09
rofl
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
15 Oct 09
I was very much against Michael Vick's return as well, for the record. The opposition to his buying a team has nothing to do with what he thinks about the president. I'd bet that the majority of the owners voted for McCain...either because they're wealthy, greedy businessmen or because they're dirty old men with the hots for Sarah...lol! (Now, don't get mad, I'm JOKING!) Annie
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
13 Oct 09
Don't be absurd Ted. You know full well that opposing the messiah is a far worse crime than torturing animals.
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Oct 09
I feel that the Only players Rush will get to play for him are Members of the new Hitler youth. There are a few black football players who have already said they won't play for him.I think it is silly for rush , a known bigot , to try to own a sportsteam where about 80% of the players are black. What ,he thinks they can't read? Or hear what he has already said?
1 person likes this
• United States
17 Oct 09
Wow! Now that's impressive. I guess Rush's mouth got his A$$ in trouble!
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
17 Oct 09
He probably DOES assume they can't read! As it turned out it wasn't only black players but the union leadership and some owners who objected, not to mention thousands of fans who signed a petition. Annie
1 person likes this
@oneidmnster (1384)
• United States
14 Oct 09
There are many worse NFL owners out there.As far as I'm concerned,if it makes the worst racists in the country mad,(Al Sharpton) I'm all for it for that reason alone. Would it be bad for football?I doubt it would make a big difference.Let's face it,Al Davis is still around and he's a terrible owner.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
15 Oct 09
I KNOW many here will disagree with me but I think Rush is a much worse racist than Sharpton. I don't really know enough about Al Davis to state an opinion on him. I know I can't stand Jerry Jones! Annie
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
14 Oct 09
I am no fan of Rush's but, we have had atleast one other racist team owner although it was baseball not football and her words ended up getting her banned from the stadium Maybe Rush will get the same treatment? I don't watch football and I don't "root" for any team.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
16 Oct 09
I vaguely remember that but I can't remember what her name was or what team she owned. We won't get the chance to see what kind of treatment Rush will get since they dropped him like a hot potato. Hey, he looks kind of like Mr. Potato Head, doesn't he...lol? Annie
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
16 Oct 09
Too bad he isn't on television anymore because we could wait and see if his nose falls off LOL
1 person likes this
@BlueGoblin (1829)
• United States
14 Oct 09
His personal views should have nothing to do with him owning the Rams. Only Rush would have to worry about tickets and merchandise sales since he would be the owner. Rush said McNabb was overrated because the media wanted a black quarterback to succeed. He had to step down from his post at ESPN. Michael Irvin said Tony Romo had to be black because Romo was a good athlete. Did he have to step down? No. Is Irvin still accused of being racist? No. Did it even cause a major controversy? No. It's common for whites to lose their job when making similar comments. Of course Irvin is not trying to own an NFL football team. However, I doubt people would be labeling Irvin a racist and trying to shutting him out.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
16 Oct 09
Actually he had partners in the deal and apparently they didn't think he was worth the risk. This is capitalism at work and that's what Rush loves, right? Annie
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
13 Oct 09
I've never listened to Mr Limbaugh but have heard that many take his words out of context.. I worry more about the extreme left as they like to throw over the foundations of the u.s. and family structure of society, thinking traditionalism and christianity are great evils.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
14 Oct 09
I HAVE listened to him and I can assure you his words are NOT taken out of context. He's a racist, sexist hypocrite through and through. Annie
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
13 Oct 09
I've heard about it and I really don't care. As another poster mentioned, most people have no idea who owns their team. The only owners I can name are Ralph Wilson (he owns my team), Jerry Jones, Art Modell and Green Bay (they own their own team). Many people consider Jerry Jones to be a complete jerk, but I've never seen that stop anyone from playing on his team. Art Modell was considered a pariah for moving the Browns to Baltimore and I never heard a single player refuse to play for his team after the move. I also have yet to see any clear evidence of Rush's racism. He may be racist, but all anyone has ever done is show me some bogus claims from left wing blogs. Yes, I know about his argument about Donovan McNabb. While I disagreed with him, the argument did have merits.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
15 Oct 09
Here are some examples; if you don't think he's a racist we have different views about what the word means: http://www.rushisaracist.com He's out of the group of bidders now, probably in part due to a petition that got 25,000 signatures in 8 hours. Annie
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
16 Oct 09
Annie, that site is filled with lies that have been repeated many times and now may lead to CNN, MSNBC, and the NY Times being sued. I really wish you could one day learn to check reputable sources instead of left wing hate sites.
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
13 Oct 09
He is buying a football team. It is business deal straight up. I am so sad to see that you can't separate a person's politics from what is a business deal. He made his money putting his opinion out there. Just like every single person on this board is doing. Unfortunately, we are getting a lot less than he is for it. Have you even looked at the record of the team he is buying? They are on a major losing streak at the moment. So what if a football player decides not to play on the team? Players change teams all the time. It is very common in the sports arena. That is really up to them and what they think is best. I doubt people will stop watching. Fans are fans. I doubt ticket sales would be affected that much, since sales always drop when they are losing and sales increase when they win. Some people still love their teams and you are sadly underestimating the loyalty of sports fans. Everyone knows it is the coaches that count in football. Your whole point is entirely and utterly ridiculous.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
15 Oct 09
It's not "prejudice" I have against him, sierras. Everyone has a right to their own opinion and I realize there are many people who really love Rush but I admittedly can't stand the man. It's NOT because he's rich or successful or because he's a conservative. It's because he's a JERK!! He'd said and done things I didn't like or agree with for years but what really put me totally against him was when he so cruelly mocked Michael J. Fox. Anyway, it is business and the other bidders made a business decision to drop him from the bid. Nobody made them do it but there was a lot of protest against Limbaugh from owners, players and fans so I guess this is the market at work, right? Annie
• United States
15 Oct 09
Actually, it was not the market forces that caused his being dropped from the team. I am really surprised that even if you don't like the guy that you still seem to be happy about the discrimination that is going on. That it is a sad state of affairs especially when you preach about everyone being equal.
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
14 Oct 09
"If you were a player, how would you feel about playing for someone many believe is a racist?" But isn't it more wrong for people to make up lies and quotes that were never uttered to make many people believe he is a racist? How would you feel about standing up to liars and journalists who don't fact-check before printing or reporting something and thereby ruin the reputation of people who may not be guilty of those things of which they stand accused in the media? I think it's more important to go with what you know for a fact than to go with what many believe. Many are often mistaken.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
16 Oct 09
It certainly WOULD be "more wrong for people to make up lies and quotes that were never uttered to make many people believe he is a racist". I've actually heard every one of the quotes attributed to Rush that has caused this controversy right from "the horse's mouth". Rush has made a career of saying outrageous things that he knows will upset some people so if his reputation has been ruined he has nobody to blame but himself! Annie
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
13 Oct 09
The bottom line is the money. Anyone who thinks that these guys would risk giving up millions because of who owns their team is in a fantasy land of denial. Money talks bullsh*t walks. I suppose there will be those few who walk but they probably should because if they're willing to let who owns their team get to them they weren't good for the team in the first place. I'm saying this as someone who hates football and not too fond of Limbaugh either.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
14 Oct 09
Thank you for giving me your clearly unbiased opinion! I sure can't disagree with you that money talks! Annie
• United States
13 Oct 09
I have seen this one on the news and all I really have to say is....why does it matter? Heck I watch football on SUndays. I like football....But I could not tell you who even ONE of the owners of those teams are. And it really does not matter to me. Football is football. Politics is politics. I am not a big rush fan. Not by any measure. I personally don't like the man. But I won't let my personal opinon of him effect my football. As for the players...well it is their careers. If they want to change teams because they don't like the owner than that is their right. I am sure there have been others who have changed teams because they did not like the owner or coaches. So does this mean if people don't like the political views of their bosses, CEOS, managers,etc....they should quite their jobs too? Wow that would mean a lot of umeployeed people in this country. Does that mean that only "republicans" should work for certain companies and only "democrtats" should work for certain companies? How about we split the players up. Half of the teams will have the republican players....the democrats the other half.Politics is starting to bleed in to things and places it does not belong. And I am not just talking about Rush. If he wants to buy the team...fine it is his money. I am talking about how EVERYTHING seems to be politized lately. Big deal made over nothing in my opinion.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
14 Oct 09
It doesn't matter to ME either but it is "big news" so I thought I'd see what tohers here thought about it. The fact is, most of the NFL owners are conservative Republicans, or so I heard recently. It's probably a fair guess, though not a sure thing, that since about 70% of the players in the NFL are African-American most of the players are not Republicans. Gee, I guess that would mean splitting the players up might not work so well...lol! Anyway, it's really not a question of Limbaugh being conservative but of the racist remarks he's made through the years that have upset many of the players and even some of the owners. I agree, politics is starting to bleed into everything. It's always been this way to some extent but it's a lot more visible now. There are many people involved in politics who give their opinion on things in other fields and people in other fields who speak out about politics so I guess you could say it's hard to tell the difference sometimes. Annie
@andy77e (5156)
• United States
14 Oct 09
Well, he isn't racist, so that's their problem. If they listened to his show, instead of to liberal biased critic, they'd know that. Lose ticket sales? Are you kidding? Since when do football fans care a wit about who owns the team? Most fans do not even know who owns their team. Why would anyone root against a team based on who owns them? Talk about being unfair and prejudice, you are going to specifically wish a bunch of foot ball players to lose, simply because of who owns the team? So much for being open minded and non-judgmental. Lastly, regardless of whether they win or lose, Rush will still make money on the team. Even the worst teams in the NFL, earn their owners money, or they wouldn't own them. Classic liberalism. Root for everyone to lose, never for anyone to win.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
17 Oct 09
Well, I'm afraid we'll have to agree to disagree on this one! I HAVE listened to him - daily for years - and in my opinion HE IS A RACIST!! I'm also NOT unfair or prejudice, I don't "root for everyone to lose" and I AM open minded and non-judgmental. In my opinion, this isn't about him being a conservative or anyone being a liberal, it's about him being a racist a$$hole! Annie
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
14 Oct 09
Some football teams do struggle with profits, but it's never about the owner, it's about the team's record. Winning teams always have solid income regardless of how many criminals are on their team or who their owner is. Teams with losing records over the long term however struggle and often move to a more lucrative location.
@andy77e (5156)
• United States
14 Oct 09
How does moving to a new location, help a losing team win?