Can the number of responses determind the quality of a discussion?

Hi paula27661

I have some same experiences and observation. But I don't want to say that good discussion never get response. But some time important discussion is ignored and some jolly talk are running on. It is little thinkable mater.

It is also observed by me that some very good discussion are also well responded here. I have sent you a link from a use with maiden discussion but very thinkable matter but just one except is respond there. This is why the question is raised in my mind. If some one send any user post very important discussion in maiden discussion should it be ignored as he has no friend?

It is not my complain but my feeling and sorry to say that I feel little sad too.

I agree with Paula.

Hi

Is it not necessary to create the habit to meaningful discussion that no good discussion have to face the scarcity of response? If no good discussion left without response that mylot will be a example of meaningful discussion group.

For me, the numbers is a good indication if the discussion is good. The reason being is that: One will not waste time if the discussion is meaningless.

Hi bodhisatya

I seriously disclose that I have not post this discussion from my personal point of view. I am really satisfied if ever for my any discussion I will not get even a single repose. It is my noble opinion that the number of response can't be the measures of the quality. Daily a mylot digest send to us .... I don't know whether this top discussion is consider on the number or any other measures are there. I don't know my this very experience is against the guideline or not but I ever give the priority to the quality than the quantity.

Hi learn2earn

Number of respond I get here is the meaning that there are so many people here, who have the consciousness of the quality of discussion. I think myloter are aware of this very point. But I politely confess that I have not start this discussion to gather response but to make myloter aware to the quality discussion. I want to say that if even there is no quality in my this very discussion then it also should be ignored. But quality discussion if even the frist post of any quality discussion should be welcomed. I have see right now in the mylot a single brainstorming discussion is facing scarcity of resolve. Its heart biting for me. Thank you for this awareness.

I agree. When i get the top discussions in my email each morning I am amazed at the same old silly topics appear there day after day.

Hi muscles4me

You are right. I am the instance that in this time in mylot there are so many discussion lying, those are far more quality that my this one. Bout I get more response for the sensational quality of the title of this discussion.

Any way I am happy that there are many myloter that, who have the awareness on the point I have raised.

Hi shibham

In one sense you are right. But if we try to judge the discussion on the basis of author that some unknown author may be ignored. But the author of a discussion should not be the measures of quality. Some time quality authors also produce quality less discussion. So to mastermind the quality we must read it. this is happened here because all are running after number. We have no time to read . We just see the author. If author is well known then it is ok for us. Unknown author should not get the facility to be explored?

Hi rehan_andaman

You are right . there is a chance to get response if the discussion is interesting. But from my observation i find the some time very poor quality discussion get so much responds that it can't be imagine too.

Hi padhiaranand

I am very tough to myself too. I certainly know that my this very discussion is not a quality discussion ut lot response I get. Actually in this post there is a sensation that attract most people. And some have the noble feelings too for responding this discussion. Some have objection that leads them to respond here. So there are so many features that this discussion must receive response. But the pity is that there are so many important discussion lying there with few response that's the matter of worry about.

Thats right....people just looking for his/her interest...so thats why some discussion get too much responses..and some one which is best per quality but not much interesting which get less responses in compare of others.

Hi padhiaranand

What you said is common people mentality. We myloter should try to cross the limits of the common people mentality.

very true...we should also go for new one...which will be better for everyone..happy lotting friend.

Hi padhiaranand

You are welcome to the quality discussion from any author. I think you response glorify those and inspire them to post more meaningful discussion.

Hi kush20006

No it is I think may not be the measures of quality. Quality can't be determined by vote.

but votes fall only to quality
a lesser qualitative person will not be supported as compared to a superior one

Hi
kush20006

No this is the negative side of the democracy that in democracy majority is granted. But History says that folk are generally in wrong.

Just rethink the instance of Galileo

When he said the Earth moved round the Sun ...people said the The Sun round the Earth.

So it is not necessary that majority must be correct. But in democracy it is granted. that is the defect of democracy.

but tell me if democracy is not to be followed then who is the judge who will tell about the quality

hi kush20006

There must should have some expat to determined it. I don't say that all popular discussions are quality less. But I observed that some of the popular discussion are quality less, it can;t be ignored.

I don't know the quality measure system of mylot. I just want other view on the number of responses may determined the real value or not. It is a open discussion. I just want to know the view. Thank you for your view.

reeyan im not talking about the my lot or anything
im talking in general i think the democracy is everywhere
and majority wins always

Hi kush20006

It is right that majority win but it is not necessary that majority must be right.

thats true majority is not always right but majority makes even wrong thing look right as so many people beleive it
so if u oppose it you are called wrong not the wrong thing

Hi kush20006

Yeah I know that I am called wrong if majority says. But there is the other fact too though I am called wrong I am confident that I am right. And that;s the nature of truth. Truth has no need of support. Its stands in alone.

but truth if looked from the otherside becomes false it is the point of view that matters

Hi kush20006

But the matter is where from your view is pointed.

the same thing lies everywhere terrorist justify them by sayin that they are revoulutionary and we call them terrorist

Hi kush20006

I think you cross your limit. Every thing has its own boundary. And the value of matter is in its superior position when that is in proper position. Miss placement of matter means devaluation. I think you are not well to place you word in proper position.

Revolutionary and terrorism two different thing. So I think you are not aware of all this meaning.

reeyan whatever you think about it but the quality of the thing is there only when it is appreciated by others
even if you have certain quality if it is hidden then or not appreciated it no longer remains of any use similar to the body part which has no function
so even if any person or disscussion is quantitative but not qualitative the fact lies that the quantitative one has been more appreciated or it has more followers or evokers
and the qualitative one may be good for you but it is useless for others
this all lies in our grey matter which takes various decison about it.

Hi
Your this point is really an important issue. But just think that what is appreciated is really valuable. Just think of drugs and the medicine. Drugs are so popular is it promotable. Many people don't like to take medicine but found of drugs. On the basis of popularity then drugs are more valuable?

Hi skysuccess

That's I meant to say. No of response is not the measuring scale of a discussion. I know my this very discussion is not a quality discussion. But my friend' no is high and in the title there is a sensation that intends people to respond. This is an instance that there are many many high quality discussion there that not receive respond even equal to this one too.

Hi aulius111

I am not agree with you. More people attracted so it must have the quality it is not logical.

Quality can't be determined by democracy. Generally mob fail to find the root of the truth. Truth is always ignored by mob. History says so.

I don't know what to say to that, perhaps you are right.

I meant to say popularity is not the measures of quality.

Aulius please excuse me barging in again but Isaw something interesting in this box.

Popularity does not decide many things in this life reeyan but it is almost more important nowadays than many other things which should be more important. Is it not popularity which decides that a certain singer is better than another, not because they have more talent but because they have a manager behind them who will promote them? Popularity will make that person more successful in terms of earning, but it will not cause them to have talent which was missing in the first place surely?

Hi mysdianait

I am not deny the importance of popularity. But value can't be determined by popularity. You just estimate the price by popularity. I think you are aware of the difference between value and price.

Hi getbrowser

98/100 really great . Why you say you are not popular?

In what people are interested is not be the measures of quality. This is my belief. Quantity can't be the measures of quality. Quality should be measures by quality.

reeyan, tsk tsk tsk, always the serious one. I just read his topic and i don't browser saying either if he was popular or not, he said even he is not familiar with the rules and regulations of this site. i really don't see the reason why you are trying your best to dig deeper on the quality thing. are you aware now that it depends entirely on the discussions, but even so some are not even that good quality but they respond to it, even the simpler ones. and how on earth do you measure quality with quality? hope you're not drunk or anything.

Hi LetranKnight25

No No No

I am not try to do any quality test. I just asked that may quantity consider as the measures of quality. So many people are here so it is definably be a mixture of test be here. But in the mixture is not the quality sinking. Just asking. I am not arguing.