sign in • sign up
web | myLot | discussions | tasks | blogs | news | photos
homeinterestsdiscussionstasksblogsnewsmessages friendsphotosearningsmyLotquizzes

sponsors
Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance
See Rates - No Credit Check Needed. ($90,000 Refinance under $489/mo)
www.LowerMyBills.com

Obama Backs Auto Insurance Regulation
Drivers Pay $44/mo on Avg for Car Insurance. Are you paying too much?
Auto-Insurance-Experts.com

Spyware& Trojan Remover
Download Free Trojan& Spyware Scan Recommended and Used By The Experts
www.pctools.com

Top Marine visits US troops in two war zones email this discussion to a friend?

By LARA JAKES
Associated Press Writer
 
5 months ago

CAMP RAMADI, Iraq (AP) - The top U.S. Marine is checking on troops in one war zone as he gets ready to send more to the next.


Gen. James Conway, commandant of the Marine Corps, visited Iraq this week before flying Saturday to Afghanistan, where the United States is considering adding more troops. Many of the fresh-faced Marines who met Conway are serving their first combat mission - and already are looking forward to the next battle.


They are part of a force that, between the years in Iraq and Afghanistan, could be fighting wars for a generation.


At a hot and dusty base outside Ramadi, the capital of Iraq's Anbar province, Conway made clear he does not yet know whether Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, will add to the 68,000 American troops already scheduled to be there by the end of the year. But Conway told the Marines he wants them to be ready.


"I'll be surprised if we don't get asked for more," Conway said. He predicted "more combat support in there."


McChrystal is preparing a review of his war - and his needs for fighting it. He is expected to deliver that review to the Pentagon by early September. Defense Secretary Robert Gates last week said the review will not address troop levels, but military officials privately believe McChrystal ultimately will ask for as many as 20,000 additional soldiers.


U.S. troops first invaded Afghanistan in 2001 after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, and Iraq two years later. Although the United States is committed to pulling its combat forces from Iraq by the end of 2011, military officials and experts believe the battle in Afghanistan easily could last for up to a decade longer.


That has required the Pentagon to rethink how to prepare its forces. The Army is recruiting 22,000 new soldiers and extending time at home for troops returning from battle. The Marines are making physical fitness more rigorous for those headed into combat.


Marines being Marines - a force that prides itself on running from one fight to the next - appear eager to head from Iraq to Afghanistan. An estimated 13,200 Marines remain in Iraq, and the vast majority of them will be gone by Thanksgiving. About 11,400 Marines are currently in Afghanistan.


"We're an expeditionary force; we're very offensive-minded, and it would be a better use of our time to be in Afghanistan," said Capt. John Roma, commander of a Marine company that deployed to Iraq just two weeks ago. It's his second tour of duty in Iraq; he has also fought in Afghanistan.


"But we still have a job to do here, and we're doing it to the best of our ability."


All troops will receive at least as much time at home between deployments as they spent in combat, meaning those currently in Iraq will not go to Afghanistan immediately.


Whether the U.S. should send more troops to Afghanistan is part of a simmering debate in Washington over how much money, and ultimately, time should be spent on the war. A recent policy paper by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank, warned against shortchanging the war in Afghanistan.


"Adequate resources win in Iraq, inadequate resources lose in Afghanistan: Late in one case, still waiting in the other," the CSIS paper concluded.


Under a security agreement with the Iraqi government, U.S. troops no longer operate in Iraqi cities without permission or escort by local Iraqi forces. In Anbar, that means Marines have scaled back their missions to the point of being bored, even though violence between Iraqis continues.


A pair of deadly bombs this week in Baghdad killed nearly 100 people and wounded hundreds more. In July 2007, 203 coalition forces were killed by improvised explosive devices, military figures show. By comparison, IED blasts killed nine troops last month.


But security remains fragile, and some local Iraqi officials are evasive about whether they want Americans to help protect them from insurgents and other threats even as the troops prepare to move on.


Saeed Hamadan, mayor-elect of Hit, in Anbar, said Baghdad gets the most attention but his city faces the same threats as the rest of Iraq.


"We see explosions every day," Hamadan said in his office last week.


In an interview with The Associated Press, Conway said that in Afghanistan up to 700 troops should be added or, at the least, retasked to focus on IED attacks. He estimates such attacks have caused 80 percent of Marine deaths since May, when the U.S. launched a major offensive against the Taliban in southern Afghanistan.


He would not discuss how many troops ultimately could be added to the fight, except to say that he does not want it to go beyond 18,000 more Marines, or he won't be able to protect the length of Marines' time at home between war zones.


"The most important thing that's happening is right here in Iraq," Conway said during a question-and-answer session with troops at Camp Taqqadum air base, 35 miles west of Baghdad. "The most difficult thing that's happening for our Corps today is in Afghanistan. And I think we're going to be there for a while, and if you all want to go to Afghanistan - that's been my experience from talking to most Marines - then you may well get that chance."



tags:  marine warfighters, health care, education, wars
 
1. myLot reputation of 91/100. the_vicar (4853)   5 months ago

I wish we would pull our troops from both areas and bring them home. I hate war. I don't understand why these countries can't handle their own problems. They need to spend THEIR money to pay for all of this. Surely, they have a secret police and surely they are competent to wipe out Taliban forces. They know who they are. Why do we have to spend the lives of our troops and have our troops come home in a wooden box?

We cannot continue to police the world. We need to police our own borders to keep terrorism out rather than spread our troops out around the world. Why is the htinking behind building expensive bases and then abandoning them? We spend billions of dollars each month on supporting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Couldn't that money be spent on health care and education for our own people?

 
sponsors
Online College Degrees
Get your AA, BA, Masters or PhD at a Top Online School. Start Now.
CollegeDegreeNetwork.com/Degrees

other presidential cabinet news

Watchdog faults US anti-drug effort in Afghanistan

The State Department's internal watchdog on Wednesday criticized the agency's nearly $2 billion anti-drug effort in Afghanistan for poor oversight and lack of a long-term strategy.

Started in presidential cabinet news • 3 minutes ago • 0 responses
Tags: united states, us afghanistan drugs
US freezing assets of Iraq-based insurgent group

The Treasury Department is freezing the assets of an Iraq-based insurgent group that has conducted or supported violent raids against U.S. and coalition forces.

Started in presidential cabinet news • 19 hours ago • 0 responses
FBI: Murders fall 10 percent in first half of 2009

The FBI says murders fell 10 percent across the country in the first half of 2009.

Started in presidential cabinet news • 3 days ago • 0 responses
Despite recession, crime keeps falling

WASHINGTON _ High unemployment. More folks on food stamps. Fewer owning their homes. Yet for all the signs of recession, something is missing: More crime.

Started in presidential cabinet news • 1 response • Last response by echomonster (0) • 1 day ago
Tags: united states, murder down, falling crime, recession, unemployment
AP ENTERPRISE: Vets wait for GI Bill payments

Universities and colleges are still waiting for tuition payments for thousands of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who attended school last fall under the new GI Bill, leaving the veterans panicked that...

Started in presidential cabinet news • 18 hours ago • 0 responses
Tags: united states, gi bill delays
FILE - In this  Jan. 14, 2009 file photo, Veterans Affairs Secretary-designate Gen. Eric Shinseki testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington,  before the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee hearing on his nomination. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)
return to mylot
We are loading a word from our sponsors. No thanks, cancel loading.