Poor Vs. Famous

@bikespot (483)
Canada
January 6, 2008 6:04pm CST
I started a thread earlier about Famous Vs Rich. Everyone picked Rich , because they didn't want to be famous or wouldn't be able to handle it. Now i have a harder decision. Would you rather be Poor or Famous? I would pick famous , because then if i was famous i would be able to be richer. I don't know if i could handle the media though , so as long as I'm not that famous.
1 person likes this
3 responses
@chooochy (356)
7 Jan 08
i think id gor for famous but id be a really boring celebrity so the paps didnt bother following me around cos id be so dull lol
@jormins (1223)
• United States
7 Jan 08
I'd go famous too. I think celeb's like Brittany bring some of it on themselves. With all that money you can hire a team of people to keep you out of the limelight. I don't know how many semi-famous celebs I've seen on Leno or whoever saying that they just throw on a hat and no one recognizes them. I'd have dummy cars, secret entrances, fake beards, fake wigs, etc.
@rsa101 (40952)
• Philippines
7 Jan 08
Tough question indeed.... Well of course everyone will choose to be famous than being poor but then I might choose to be poor coz being poor doesn't mean you don't have the chance of getting rich. There are people who became rich not being famous but they strive to be rich and became one and being famous just followed as he became rich.