I would of ..

@Ldyjarhead (10233)
United States
May 3, 2008 10:46am CST
Yep, I would of. And not just because I could of. Or even that I should of. Actually, I really wouldn't of - because it's just WRONG! The correct way of saying it is 'would have' or 'could have' or 'should have' The contraction would be: would've should've could've ... which just happens to SOUND like 'of', but is grossly incorrect. Would HAVE Could HAVE Should HAVE Get it? I think that's an even bigger pet peeve of mine that the 'oh' being used incorrectly for a 'zero'. It's become much more commonplace to use it incorrectly as I've shown above, and it really irks me that we let our children get away with it. What are they being taught in schools today? Do you do it? Do you realize it's incorrect? Will you continue to say it?
4 people like this
14 responses
@Malyck (3425)
• Australia
4 May 08
OH THANK GOODNESS! I actually thought, when I began reading, that you were seriously using those terms and coming to some other point. I'm so glad that someone is giving some grammar/language lessons around here. I mean, obviously not everyone can spell all that wonderfully, and there are definitely a tonne of people with limited vocabularies, but how difficult is it to learn and remember simple things like this. I'm not long out of school, but even at school, where it's being taught, kids are getting away with things like this every single day. One of my pet peeves is "than" and "then". How can people who have passed 6th grade not know the difference? So many people say things like "I'm no better then you" etc, and it gets right under my skin. Spelling and grammar of school-age children and teenagers is getting worse, and unfortunately I think it does have a lot to do with the internet and mobile phones, where people are too lazy to complete a sentence with correct punctuation, grammar, spelling and few abbreviations. Even friends of mine who are really intelligent just lose the plot once they get on a computer and start with the text speak and think that numbers are interchangeable with letters and words. "C u 2mo m8 n will (not we'll, a lot of that kind of thing these days also) sk8 ova 2 da sh0ps" for one quite awful example =P I don't understand why people have difficulty with or think it's so time-consuming to correspond using some kind of acknowledged and complete language. =D
@Malyck (3425)
• Australia
4 May 08
Colloquialisms is indeed a word. One that I happen to like, at that =) I use them as well, along with lol, the occasional "brb" etc. in instant messaging, but it's not like I forget how to string a few words together just because I'm on the internet like some people do. I do like to write somewhat phonetically and in my vernacular as well, so you might find me asking a friend over MSN "How's you doing?", "Whatchya's up tooooooooooo" etc, just because it's a bit of fun, and that's how I would say it were we conversing verbally. We should all know that there's a time and place though, for example NOT in CVs =P Lol, that's so funny. Have a good one!
2 people like this
@Malyck (3425)
• Australia
4 May 08
I forgot to mention: I am guilty, however, of saying "oh" for the number (or lack of number) 0, instead of saying zero. I'm going to blame that on being Australian =P
2 people like this
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
4 May 08
I absolutely agree that 'text speak' is making things much worse. I'll use simple terms like LOL sometimes and that sort of thing, and also colloquialisms (is that a word?) like gotcha and that sort, but I think it's fairly obvious when I'm writing/speaking that those reading/hearing know exactly what I'm doing. I can't imagine writing a resume or business letter and using those terms or 'could of', yet I've received correspondence that has gross grammatical errors and it really bugs the heck outa me (LOL) .... (And yes, I did that purposely)
2 people like this
@carmelanirel (20942)
• United States
4 May 08
Ok, now I am feeling like I have my old English teacher back.. (btw, that is a good thing, I loved English and my teacher..) I say "would've,could've, or should've" which is would have,could have or should have, but shorter.. And now that I typed it, it shows that should've is not correct, but the other two is showing the correct spelling which makes it correct to say, correct????
• United States
4 May 08
I didn't see reply number 2 thanks to not being able to view this discussion through my in box..Anyways, if should've is correct, how come my spell check is showing it isn't??
2 people like this
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
4 May 08
Can't help you on the spellcheck, but they are proper contractions. It's when people hear it and spell it like 'should of' - that's what is wrong.
2 people like this
@winterose (39887)
• Canada
3 May 08
I have never used this contraction because I know it doesn't exist. Most people don't know and the add it to the language, but the greatest thing about language is that it constantly evolves and one day all the colloquialisms we see now well gradually make their way into the dictionary. The biggest think I see is noone, that does not exist it is no one.
2 people like this
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
3 May 08
The contractions 'would've', 'should've' and 'could've' are correct. Its the use of the word 'of' that is incorrect.
2 people like this
@Bd200789 (2994)
• United States
4 May 08
No, I don't say it. I either say would have, or use the contaction. I hate when people do that. Sometimes I do say oh for zero, but not often. I try not to do that.
2 people like this
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
4 May 08
My problem is that the people who are using 'of' don't even realize it's wrong, and doesn't make any sense.
1 person likes this
@moneyandgc (3428)
• United States
4 May 08
How do you know if they are saying would've or would of unless it is written? I am just going to say "woulda, coulda and shoulda"! My husband and I talk about the word "irregardless" when it should be "regardless".
2 people like this
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
4 May 08
I was referring more to the written word where there is no doubt as to what they're 'saying', and that tells me they don't know what it should be. Depending on how the person says it, there is also a distinct difference in how it is heard orally; some definitely say 'of'.
2 people like this
@toosh21 (800)
• Australia
4 May 08
Yes I do the "oh" thing occasionally but not the "of" - and I am trying my hardest not to say "oh" particularly now I have children of my own & I want them to speak correctly.
2 people like this
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
4 May 08
In the spoken word it's hard to discern between the two, but it grates my nerves terribly when I see someone write it that way. They really believe that it's proper: could of. Gives me the willies ...
3 people like this
• United States
9 May 08
I tend to use the contractions--'I would've done X, Y & Z'. I also say, 'I could have done that'. I think it's a combination of several problems: [i]- Lazy teachers who just pass kids year after year, without ensuring that students know the basics of grammar and spelling, as well as how to write a sentence! - Parents who don't enforce correct grammar (I raised my daughter to say 'May I have another drink?', not 'Can I have another drink?'. You CAN have one, but you MAY no have one! - Outside influences, such as the media and internet.[/i] My freshman English teacher wanted to ensure that we could all spell. I have phenomenal spelling skills 22 years later, but I've never had the opportunity to read Romeo and Juliet! (What is Romeo and Juliet going to teach me anyway?)
• United States
9 May 08
You've got it! Some classics are boring, but others can be quite compelling. Take care!
1 person likes this
@bgerig (1258)
• United States
4 May 08
You are very articulate....and absolutely correct on this issue. I just hope a lot of people who need to actually read your post and learn from it. Another word which bothers me greatly is 'git' for 'get'. Do you think English is taught like it used to be taught in the grade schools? I don't think kids today diagram sentences or spend much time at all on grammar. Oh, well. Have a good weekend.
1 person likes this
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
4 May 08
You know, I hated English class in grade school and always had trouble with diagramming sentences because it just wasn't interesting to me. I know how to talk, can string a few words together passably, so what do I need to know a subject from a predicate for? I do use slang and silly words often, though, but I do know the difference between what is 'playing' and what is correct, and I'm hoping that when I'm writing it, that others realize I know the difference.
2 people like this
@bagumbayan (2705)
• Philippines
6 May 08
Maybe you are an english teacher. You cannot blame others using that maybe because english is not their medium of instructions. I myself, although English is also our medium of instruction other than our own language, I am also not so good in the language. This word, has, have, happen, happens, happened I always interchanged the usage. The present tense, the past tense and the future tense, I sometimes use it incorrectly. Bear with me and the others.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
7 May 08
Thats the problem now. Texting is the worst teacher to our children. By all means we must all learn. Thanks for the comment.
1 person likes this
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
6 May 08
No, I am not an English teacher. It is very basic English that is taught to children in our country. It has nothing to do with tense or a similar word. I have a lot of tolerance for those who do not know English as a first language. I have much less tolerance for gross misuse of basic grammar for those born and raised in the U.S. There is no need for it to be so rampant and we need to get back to basics instead of our kids being educated by a cell phone keypad.
1 person likes this
• United States
4 May 08
Thankfully, I never have said "would of." I have always either said would have or would've (same with should and could). If writing something more business oriented, would write would have; if to a friend, I would write would've. It's just ignorance that makes people say things like would of. I don't even think they try to teach English anymore! Someone mentioned spell-check...I hate spell-check, too! It finds errors with everything.
1 person likes this
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
4 May 08
I could never say it either. It just grates my nerves. It doesn't even make any sense!
1 person likes this
@Hatley (163772)
• Garden Grove, California
4 May 08
ldyjarhead you are so right and I catch myself doing that all the time. I was taught better' years ago but have slipped into this would of could of should of thing. I know better and I would have if I could have but I know I should have used have all the time. I am going to clean up my act and put of only where it makes sense.
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
4 May 08
LOL ... good for you!
2 people like this
• United States
4 May 08
Speaking of whining... hahaha! I think I say "have" when I say it the "long way"...but I usually say it using the contraction. And if I say all three, I say "uh"... woulda, coulda, shoulda...!
1 person likes this
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
4 May 08
Yea, but the contraction is acceptable and proper (if not formal), but 'of' doesn't belong at all! And oh yes, the 'coulda woulda shoulda' falls into one of the colloquialisms I was referring to. You done ok! LOL ...
1 person likes this
@koalatbs (2229)
• United States
8 May 08
I guess I talk differently at home than out in public. It really depends on the situation. At home I'm more laid back and if I am at a fancy event I, of course, watch my pronounciation and grammer much more than I do at home. My husband is from Jordan and his native language is Arabic, not English. Did you know that English is actually the most difficult language to learn?! There are so many different slang terms that we have invented through the years. My husband just turned 33 years old, today actually, and began learning English in the 5th grade in Jordan. He still has to ask me every now and then what a certain phrase means. I barely know any Arabic. I really really need to start working on it. I have never been very good at learning foreign languages. I took French in high school for two years and struggled to get C's. Now, my sister, on the other hand, picks up languages very easily and accents too. Ok, I'm getting a little off topic... yes, I believe that people really need to get back to the basics and re-learn our own language in America. Most of us know what is proper & correct English, but just do not bother to speak the way we should.
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
8 May 08
When speaking, it's easy enough to tell when someone is just being cute/funny or when they just don't know any better. Goodness, I still use baby-talk around here sometimes. When someone uses 'of' instead of the proper contraction or the word 'have', that's just plain ignorance.
1 person likes this
@dawnald (85137)
• Shingle Springs, California
5 May 08
I may pronounce it that way, but I don't write it that way. But if you want to get that out of the language, why not remove the following things that are rampant: loose for lose to for too your for you're their or there for they're it's for its etc. etc. etc. Unfortunately, those things seem to have crept in and there's probably no getting them out!
1 person likes this
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
5 May 08
I agree Dawn, but for the examples you mentioned, they are at least pronounced the same. There is no excusing of in the cases I mentioned. If I'm typing fast and don't go back and read what I've written, I'll often use the improper word (to instead of too, etc), but I do know the difference. Not so for those that use of instead of have or the appropriate contraction.
1 person likes this
@dawnald (85137)
• Shingle Springs, California
5 May 08
It is harder when they are pronounced the same, English not being phonetic and all. But there are many other examples that don't sound the same. Reoccur instead of recur, for example, and some others that are escaping me right now....
1 person likes this
@dawnald (85137)
• Shingle Springs, California
13 May 08
moot and mute... a mute point... I hear that one at work all the time...