It's started..charging for time on the Internet

@coffeebreak (17797)
United States
August 29, 2008 7:45am CST
I had heard about this last spring and then nothing ...until now. Comcast is the first ISP to start charging for time on the internet. Article says 99% won't be effected by this new "Threshold" (fancy for saying price increase!) but if nearly their entire membership won't be effected, what's the problem? I understand what they are saying as to some "over using" or abusing the internet system, but still...if 99% are not over using, why increase it to so few? Could it be because it is the first step in their plan to increase it to all by this time next year.. Then it says that Comcast over sold their network as to the reason for this - well, why is that our fault! Okay, I'd venture to say this won't effect me and many others like me - just home uses, I have no idea how much "time" is 250 GB, but I doubt I use that much,(does mylot, emails and PTC use that much?. And although I might be tagged as cynical, history has a way of repeating itself and it just looks like increases to the internet are on their way...ergo Time Warner Cable doing the same come January http://news.yahoo.com/story//nm/20080829/wr_nm/comcast_internet_dc So how will this effect your internet use? Granted if you don't have Comcast it won't effect you right now, but once one major entity increases their rates, users will go elsewhere and that will increase their rates - just like a can of corn cost double today what it did last year cause of the oil prices this past year...will internet access start going up? Do we need to re-work our budgets to include the higher expense or just turn of our PC's? ANd that might be something to come too - retaliation. If the world turns off their PC's for a week - and doesn't use the ISP's - hum...wonder the fiasco that'd cause! Wonder if it'd help?! What is your take or knowledge on all this?
1 response
@drannhh (15219)
• United States
30 Aug 08
I saw that and wondered myself how much bandwidth 250GB is and how we could measure how much we use daily, hourly or whatever. My understanding is that the limit had to come about because some people do a huge amount of video downloads and that uses up vastly more resource than the simple kinds of things most of us do, so maybe they did have to do something, but it seems like a bad precedent. I hope they don't take away the unlimited data plans on our cell phones any time soon!
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17797)
• United States
30 Aug 08
Yes, that is what they are saying..now... but just wait, as usual with a price increase ona contracted service, once they raise it for one, as soon as that blows over, they will raise it for all. Since it effects so few (or so they say) and for just those reasons, why dont they charge for the downloads? Why make the rest of us hang in limbo wondering if it will happen to us? Plus, I wont' use Comcast now. I'll be changing my service in the next few months since I have to move, but Comcast wont' be one I consider - simply cause of this. It really is bad publicity for them to do it this way as many of us don't understand the GB part. I don't download any videos, but might like to and also was interested in viewing TV via internet - does this effect my ability to do that? They don't say that! Didn't know about the unlimited data plans for cells. See, they've done it again. Get everyone literaly hooked on something, then raise the price!