What's the difference between 'voter registration fraud' & 'election fraud'?

@ladyluna (7004)
United States
October 15, 2008 12:10pm CST
Hello All, DEFAULT DISCLAIMER: I will politely ask: If you are not willing to commit yourself to review the links within this thread, AND leave a thoughtful response, then please move on. It is very, childish and cowardly to rate people negatively because you disagree with their opinion, but where you are unwilling to discuss or debate the content. Ask yourself: "How do I like it when people try to punish me for my opinion or perspective?" DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO UNTO YOU! ____________________________________________________________________________________On to the matter at hand: There is much discussion about the difference between Voter Registration Fraud and Election Fraud, where the insinuation is that none of the fraudulently registered voters in any of the 14 states now investigating fraudulent 'get out the vote' efforts will actually cast a fraudulent ballot. OK, that IS a plausible argument, IF and only IF, no fraudulently registered voters actually cast a vote, right? Here's the problem: At least 12 fraudulent voter registrations have been linked to the same address: 2885 Brownlee Avenue in Columbus, Ohio. And, multiple absentee ballots have been requested and sent to that address!!! The group of fraudsters are self-admittedly a part of a political activist effort to "... elect progressive candidates to the White House." The link to a detailed expose of some of these activists, and their fraudulent requests for Ohio absentee ballots can be found at the following links: ** WARNING: THE EXPOSE WILL CAUSE EVEN THE MOST ARDENT ACORN SUPPORTER TO QUESTION THE BLATANT FRAUD THAT HAS BEEN PERPETRATED AGAINST AMERICAN VOTERS!** http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/15/voter-fraud-alert-houseful-of-out-of-state-obama-activists-registered-as-ohio-voters-received-absentee-ballots/ See videos from reporters Tiffany Wilson and Shelby Holliday on this issue: http://www.palestra.net/news/17200 ____________________________________________________________________________________ [b][i]"According to the Ohio Secretary of State’s page, you must be “a resident of Ohio for at least 30 days immediately before the election in which you want to vote.” The guidelines also state: Generally, a person’s residence is the place where the person’s habitation is fixed (i.e., where the person lives on a permanent basis) and the place where the person intends to return whenever the person is absent. ...a person’s temporary presence in Ohio, such as during a vacation or working in Ohio on a temporary basis, does not make the person eligible to register and to vote in Ohio."[/i][/b] [b]My questions to you: 1. Can someone please explain to me why felony fraud charges shouldn't apply? 2. If these progressive activists cannot PROVE that they met the residency requirements to request an absentee ballot: Should fines apply? Should jail time apply? Should these individuals forever lose their right to vote? 3. Does this make you question how far reacing this type of fraud is in this Obama/McCain election? And, do you trust that the Secretaries of State will be able to pull it together to provide the voter with a bona fide fair election? 4. Any other thoughts on this?[/b]
3 people like this
6 responses
• United States
15 Oct 08
Rush Limbaugh brought up a good point today. As usual. He said that all of the extra registrations are affecting the polls. If a district or state has so many more Dems registered to vote, then the pollsters will ask more Dems to participate in the Questions. So it makes it seem that The Obama is ahead. This is why I don't care about polls. They are the MSM's "Jedi Mind Trick". I have always looked at them the same way a 6th grade teacher sees a pop quiz. It's main purpose is to let the teacher know what she needs to work on. What areas she needs to concentrate more effort on. So it is with the MSM. "Oh, people still believe that Obama is connected to Ayers? We need to A)Vilify the messenger. B)send out the counter message. C)Distract the peasants with something shiny." But I think this is going to backfire on them. Because,what they never count on is all of the Conservatives. (As many as 53% of Americans describe themselves as Conservative.)WE are not as stupid as the MSM's target demographic. WE ARE the Control Group. WE don't need to stand on street corners to register and harass people. And WE usually stay quiet until Election Day. We who post on Forums and have blogs are really in the minority. Most of the Cons just watch and listen and say nothing. Waiting for the Day that they can speak the loudest. And besides, this is what we are up against, I love this Bit. It has over a Quarter of a million hits and 79 Video Responses in two days. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyvqhdllXgU
2 people like this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
16 Oct 08
Hello Morethanamolehill, Thanks for sharing your thought on this issue. "Jedi Mind Tricks" -- ha, that's a good one! Vilify the messenger and distract 'em with something shiny: hmmm, interesting campaign strategy. Wait a second, that sounds vaguely familiar -- pretty much like most elections throughout history. When will we learn, eh? I guess that only time will tell if the Silent Majority will speak their peace this November.
1 person likes this
• United States
15 Oct 08
'Voter registration fraud' & 'election fraud' certainly are one and the same. I watched a spokesperson say otherwise on TV and just wanted to ask him if he was stupid or thinks we are? 'Voter registration fraud' is a subset of various behaviors that could be called 'election fraud'. That supposedly intelligent persons can go on TV and say they aren't without being challenged on it shows that the MSM is now practically worthless except as a propaganda tool. As to the lack of charges or jail time or fines for the 'Voter registration fraud', it all has to do with race and the intimidation that arises from fear of race riots. It is time to enforce the law. The consequences of not enforcing the law are going to be more serious than the consequences of enforcing the law. Those who resort to violence should be dealt with according to the law. Elected officials should not let fear of riots keep them from enforcing the law. Americans will support the enforcement of the election laws of the USA while simutanously turning against those who resort to violence. Enforce election fraud laws now.
1 person likes this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
15 Oct 08
Hello Red, "intimidation that arises from fear of race riots." Very interesting! I was talking with some folks the other day who were also concerned about race riots. I suggested that we all need to be alot more concerned about 'rich people riots'. If all of the wealthy people in this country decide to punish the government for over-taxing them, THEN WE'RE ALL IN FOR A WORLD OF HURTIN'! We will see a credit crisis, and employment crisis, and a productivity crisis like we have never seen before. It is currently estimated that there are trillions of U.S. dollars invested off-shore to escape US taxation. Similarly, the trend to off-shore jobs has everything to do with US businesses not surrendering to having to pay the US 35% corporate tax rate. Those businesses get a better ROI (return on investment) when they pay lower taxes. So, why would anyone think that if we tax them more, that they'll suddenly 'see the light'? If Sen. Obama, Pelosi, and Reid have their way, we're in big, big trouble. So, I'm much more worried about rich people riots than race riots!
2 people like this
• United States
15 Oct 08
Yes, the 'rich people riots' are much more serious. I heard on the radio yesterday that 74% of CEO's of American corportations are concerned the election of 0bama would harm the USA economy. I'm sure they are right. Just my knowledge of how things work tells me that if 0bama keeps his promises, there will be a major loss of jobs as the 'rich people riot'. The upside is only that 0bama is a liar and may not implement his more disasterous plans.
1 person likes this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
15 Oct 08
Hello Red, Indeed the 'rich people' riots are much more serious! Look at how much our economy has suffered since U.S. businesses started moving off-shore. If Obama-Pelosi-Reid expect to tax the top 5% to the degree that they will cover the tab for the bottom 95%, then we're all in for a rude awakening. The rich don't live from paycheck to paycheck. They can afford to move to Costa Rica or the French Rivieraand live off of their savings. Of course, when they shut down their businesses, they will cease to employ the rest of us? I also saw that statistic referencing the 74% of CEOs who are deeply concerned about Sen. Obama's economic policy. I expect that that survey fell on deaf ears, since even lawyers and car salesmen aren't as unpopular as CEOs these days.
1 person likes this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
15 Oct 08
Oh a disclaimer, one of these days I will write a disclaimer that goes "The view expressed in these thread is solely the views of a liberty love, tax hating woman that just wants to live her live with her husband the way they choose without a government official telling them what to do." Now onto the matter at hand. 1. Can someone please explain to me why felony fraud charges shouldn't apply? You know that I cannot nor would I try, because felony fraud charges should apply. 2. If these progressive activists cannot PROVE that they met the residency requirements to request an absentee ballot: Should fines apply? Should jail time apply? Should these individuals forever lose their right to vote? Yes on all accounts. Fines should be based, in my opinion, on how much taxpayer money went to the activist, and how much taxpayer money it took to fix their fraud. Jail time because they violated the most sacred part of democracy, honest election and every vote counts. If my vote is canceled out by some one's fraudulent vote, then never was the election fare nor was every vote made to count. 3. Does this make you question how far reaching this type of fraud is in this Obama/McCain election? And, do you trust that the Secretaries of State will be able to pull it together to provide the voter with a bona fide fair election? Well yes it does make me question the election. My trust is shaken when I hear that a Secretary of State from a battleground state did not want to go through all of these new questionable voter registrations. 4. Any other thoughts on this? Yes, Democrats talk about how George W. Bush was selected not elected. Well as far as I can see it Barack Obama was selected by the Democrat powers that be, and is fast on his way to be come the first African-American to steal the Presidency.
1 person likes this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
16 Oct 08
Hello Gewcew, "The view expressed in these thread is solely the views of a liberty love, tax hating woman that just wants to live her live with her husband the way they choose without a government official telling them what to do." Great disclaimer! I like your idea of basing fines on the amount that it will cost to try to undo the damage. In the case of ACORN and these college students in Ohio, the cost is going to be exhorbitant. There have already been three legal opinions rendered, and a court order for the Secretary of State to have to confirm the eligibility of every single new registrant. Imgagine how much that is going to cost? Hopefully, the secretaries of state in all 14 of the states that have initiated investigations will work double-time to shore up this mess. What happens from there is anyone's guess, eh?
1 person likes this
• United States
16 Oct 08
These people have worked themselves into such a tizzy that they think it's not only their right,but their DUTY to steal this election.
2 people like this
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
16 Oct 08
Felony fraud charges should apply, and those conveniently out of the country should be flagged and picked as they return. Let's put Homeland Security to some good use here. If these activists cannot prove there residency then they should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I look forward to reading about the civil suits against them filed by the voters who claim they were disenfranchised by this and their rights violated. The awards should leave these clown forever and irretrievably destitute. I think that this is very far reaching in this election... I further believe that this was attempted in the last two elections and despite the rampant fraud on the part of the democrats they still lost. They are attempting to steal this election. Democrats will stop at nothing to see their socialist agenda realized. I think it is far too late to ensure a fair election at this point. The damage has been done. I have a lot of other thoughts concerning the democrats, and their neocon buddies... but I can't put them here.
1 person likes this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
18 Oct 08
Hello Destiny, I agree that the Oxford students should be flagged upon returning to the USA, and picked up for questioning. I hadn't considered civil suits against them. Hmmmm, hitting 'em in the wallet is a very good idea, Destiny! Thanks for sharing what you can here. I'm intrigued, but am more than happy to respect your privacy.
@sharra1 (6340)
• Australia
16 Oct 08
Well if you had compulsory voting this would be much harder to do as everyone would be registered to vote once they turned 18 and their electorate would change if they moved but to vote in a different state they would actually have to register a change of address well before the election. It seems to me that this could only be voter fraud if these people were voting under fake names and trying to vote twice. Maybe I just do not understand your election system but in Australia it could only be voter fraud if the person was trying to vote twice in different places and using fake names to do so. We have electoral roles for the entire country and voter registration must be done months before the election. You only get one ballot paper. Absentee votes are quite common as people cannot guarantee that they will be home on the day of election so they apply for absentee votes ahead of time. These are much harder to fake as only one vote for this person will be counted. You say that there are new people being registered but how do you know that these people are not just first time voters as your system does not seem to keep electoral roles of all eligible voters in the country. How can you possibly know that they are voting twice?
1 person likes this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
16 Oct 08
Hello Sharra1, The complexity of our system is due to the fact that we are comprised of 50 different states, which are charged with their own election laws. While some might see a nationalized approach as remedial, such an approach would violate our State's Rights tenets of our Constitution. Therein lies the great dilemma. We so value our freedoms that we must continually walk a tightrope between state and federal or national, co-mingled authority. Believe me, as amn election polling judge I can see the wisdom of nationalized voting laws and procedures. It would certainly make life easier. However, it would open up Pandora's Box as it relates to issues of sovereignty. As such, I will continue to urge my fellow citizens to voluntarily consider standardized election laws. That's the only way to reach a compromise between certifiably fair elections, and the preservation of State's Rights. Just out of curiosity: What's your take on the compulsory voting aspect of your elections? Do you get a sense that people vote without really understanding the issues?
1 person likes this
@sharra1 (6340)
• Australia
17 Oct 08
I can understand that as we also have a problem with the cross over between states rights and federal laws. In answer to your question I have found that most people take the issues very seriously. There might be some who do not but on the whole people see voting as a right not as a drag. It is their big chance to make an impact on the laws that govern us. In fact I think that because it is compulsory people take a much stronger interest than if they did not have to vote. Many voters have come to believe that if you let one party hold both houses then no one can question what they do until the next election but if you have minor parties in the upper house they can block legislation and request amendments and the government has to negotiate with them or the bills do not get passed. At the moment the balance is held by 2 independents and our green party. The green are an environment party, one independent is anti gaming and the other is pro families. I do not think these people would have been elected without the voters taking the policies and issues very seriously. It does make for interesting government and challenging for the government of the day. It is interesting, when I studied politics at school I thought the upper house was a bad idea but now I have seen how important it is to reign in the government of the day. In 4 years a party with no one to block its bills can do a lot of damage. They do not see the problem as they are following their ideology but to the people that get hurt who do not follow this ideology it is damage. We have had 10 years of that and now we have voted to changed it, who knows what will happen at the next election. I know the greens are unlikely to make it in the house of representatives but if they can control the balance of power they can protect the environment and that is a good thing. If people do not have to vote then many of them can become despairing feeling that they have no impact and see no point in trying. If they have to vote they pay attention, they learn to make a difference and they exercise their right with a vengeance.
1 person likes this
@Guardian208 (1095)
• United States
17 Oct 08
This, I think, is more complicated than it appears on the surface. I think we have all been aware that some of this has been going on for years. I grew up in Chicago, where the political mantra is "Vote early, vote often!" What bothers me is the extent and the blatant way that they are "massaging" their interpretation of the law and the level to which they are organized. But why should we be surprised? The problem is the apathy of our society. We have allowed it for so long that it was inevitable that it would evolve into this level of sophistication. Its the frog in the frying pan. It gets a little worse and we don't act. So it gets worse, and we don't act. Until one day it is out of control. Much like the pervasiveness of socialist ideology that is permeating our country. 20 years ago people like Pelosi and Obama and others would have stuck out like sore thumbs. Criminal activities like stealing documents from the National Archives like Sandy Berger did would have caused outrage. We have come to ignore the transgressions of those that we feel will benefit ourselves. What ever happened to the idea "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." We have turned that idea inside out. Now, its, "Ask not only what your country can do for you, ignore the transgressions of those that promise to give it to you." The ray of hope in this story is that much of this reporting as come from college students, COLLEGE STUDENTS! What is usually the bastion of liberalism and amoral behavior, has produced a group of students, apparently a well organized group of students who are acting in a socially responsible way. They have done as outstanding job of gathering the facts and reporting the news. Tiffany would seem to have a bright future in TV Journalism, if any of the networks will hire a clear thinking person like her. So to answer your questions: 1. I am not sure if registration fraud is considered a felony. I know that the exercise of that vote is. It reminds me of a lesson I learned many years ago in a college law class. I have the right to swing my arms, until my right infringes with your face. The point being that the registration may not be fraud but the vote is. But I don't know the law well enough to know that for sure. 2. Again, I don't know what the OH law states. I would imagine that their intention is important in making that decision. At the VERY least, all of those registrations should be thrown out and if they can't get it sorted out by election day, I would consider either disallowing OH from the election or delaying their vote. I know that is an extreme response, but the very fabric of our system is in the balance. There needs to be a firm and clear message sent that this behavior WILL NOT BE TOLERATED. PERIOD! It would make these groups think twice about doing this again. 3. I tend to be optimistic. I think that this has the potential to bring this kind of activity into the light. That's when REAL change occurs. 4.I think that we should elevate registration fraud to a higher level of infraction. One that would include, large fines, jail time and loss of voter privileges. Thanks again Lady, for an intriguing discussion.
1 person likes this