Would Bill Ayers Support Someone Bombing
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
October 23, 2008 9:45am CST
The University of Illinois?
Bill Ayers believes that terrorism against targets in the US is a legitimate means of making political statements. He did it himself back in the 70s. He says that he only wishes he did it more?
So, if the former domestic terrorist has any integrity whatsoever (but I doubt he even knows what that word means), he would have to be all for bombing the University of Illinois.
Of course, he and the hypoctrical academics who are crying crocodile tears for him wouldn't support any terrorist actions against themselves. Terrorism is meant for those they hate... no one else.
The fact that taxpayer money is keeping scum like Ayers in the lap of luxury is pathetic. He is just another lying waste of human flesh who claims that wealth should help the masses, yet he lives high on the hog, while others starve.
To support or defend Bill Ayers would be equal to supporting and defending Timothy McViegh's actions in Oklahoma City.
3 people like this
2 responses
@clrumfelt (5597)
• Tennessee Ridge, Tennessee
23 Oct 08
I agree. It is a shame Ayers is living the high life at taxpayer expense. Terrorists that kill innocents in America shouldn't be treated so well. It is the same with GITMO, they are being housed and fed and living better than they ever would as citizens of their own Islamic countries, all at taxpayer expense. I say the USA should turn them out without protection and see if the people of the USA will be so sympathetic to them. They should at least be housed and treated to a life similar to the one inflicted on US captives in Islamic countries.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
29 Oct 08
It makes me wonder how they would treat Timothy McVeigh if he was allowed to live and one day went liberal.
1 person likes this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
24 Oct 08
To people like Bill Ayers and his ilk what matters is not the bombing but what was bombed. The Pentagon, a judges house, police cars , and a recruitment office are thing that can be justifiably bombed yet a state university that hires terrorist to teach pills of mush is not a justifiably bombing target.
1 person likes this
